View clinical trials related to Adenocarcinoma.
Filter by:This pilot clinical trial studies the safety and immunogenicity of vaccine therapy in treating patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cavity cancer following surgery and chemotherapy. Vaccines made from a person's peptide treated white blood cells may help the body build an effective immune response to kill tumor cells.
This phase II/III trial studies how well trametinib works and compares it to standard treatment with either letrozole, tamoxifen, paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan in treating patients with low-grade ovarian cancer or peritoneal cavity cancer that has come back (recurrent), become worse (progressive), or spread to other parts of the body. Trametinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether trametinib is more effective than standard therapy in treating patients with ovarian or peritoneal cavity cancer.
This randomized phase II clinical trial studies how well gemcitabine hydrochloride and WEE1 inhibitor MK-1775 work compared to gemcitabine hydrochloride alone in treating patients with ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer that has come back after a period of time. Gemcitabine hydrochloride may prevent tumor cells from multiplying by damaging their deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA, molecules that contain instructions for the proper development and functioning of cells), which in turn stops the tumor from growing. The protein WEE1 may help to repair the damaged tumor cells, so the tumor continues to grow. WEE1 inhibitor MK-1775 may block the WEE1 protein activity and may increase the effectiveness of gemcitabine hydrochloride by preventing the WEE1 protein from repairing damaged tumor cells without causing harm to normal cells. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine hydrochloride with or without WEE1 inhibitor MK-1775 may be an effective treatment for recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.
This phase II trial studies genetic and molecular mechanisms in assessing response in patients with prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide therapy. Androgens can cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Antihormone therapy, such as enzalutamide, may lessen the amount of androgens made by the body. Studying samples of tissue and blood in the laboratory from patients with prostate cancer may help doctors better understand castration-resistant prostate cancer. It may also help doctors make improvements in prostate cancer treatment.
This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of oncolytic measles virus encoding thyroidal sodium iodide symporter (MV-NIS) infected mesenchymal stem cells and to see how well it works in treating patients with ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer that has come back. Mesenchymal stem cells may be able to carry tumor-killing substances directly to ovarian, primary peritoneal and fallopian tube cancer cells.
This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well paclitaxel, carboplatin, and metformin hydrochloride works and compares it to paclitaxel, carboplatin, and placebo in treating patients with endometrial cancer that is stage III, IV, or has come back. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Metformin hydrochloride may help paclitaxel and carboplatin work better by making cancer cells more sensitive to the drugs. It is not yet known whether paclitaxel and carboplatin is more effective with or without metformin hydrochloride in treating endometrial cancer.
This phase II trial studies how well combination chemotherapy before and after surgery works in treating patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving combination chemotherapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. Giving these treatments after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery.
This phase II trial studies how well oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil followed by surgery and response based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy works in treating patients with cancer of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric cardia. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, paclitaxel, and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high energy x rays to kill tumor cells. Giving chemotherapy followed by surgery and response based chemotherapy and radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells.
You have been asked to consider participating in the study because you have a cancer of the prostate, which is to be treated with external beam radiation. You have chosen or felt not to be a good candidate for just watching your cancer. As your doctor has informed you, this involves delivering small amounts of radiation daily over several weeks. Normally, a small field directed to the prostate gland is given for 7.5 - 8 weeks. In total, 39 days of radiation are delivered. There is now growing evidence that prostate cancer cells may be killed more effectively if higher doses of radiation are delivered everyday (known as hypofractionation). However, the downside to such a strategy is the potential to cause more side effects because normal organs (such as the rectum and bladder) are also exposed to the higher doses. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a high-precision technique which has the ability to deliver radiation in a more focused manor, meaning that the radiation dose can be "sculpted" to the prostate gland, while minimizing the amount of radiation to the bladder and rectum. A certain amount of movement of the prostate normally occurs within the body. To make sure that the prostate will not be missed, a margin of tissue around the prostate also needs to be treated. Although a wide margin will ensure that the prostate is included, it will also cause more normal tissue to receive high doses of radiation. This, in turn, would result in more side effects. To reduce the margin needed around the prostate, and side effects, tiny gold seeds measuring 3.0 x 1.2mm will be inserted into the prostate which can be seen using a special type of X-Ray camera called a portal imager during treatment. This will allow for targeting of the prostate gland more precisely so that a significantly smaller margin of normal tissue will need to be treated. By using gold seeds in conjunction with SABR, there is the potential to safely deliver a more intensive dose of radiation to the prostate gland without increasing the amount of side effects. In other studies where shorter and more intense courses of radiation have been given using similar high-precision techniques, the side effects of treatment have indeed been no worse than the usual techniques. Over the last 7 years, Sunnybrook researchers have treated over three hundred prostate cancer patients on various research protocols with SABR. In those protocols, patients received 5 SBRT treatments over 29 days and this is currently being compared to 5 SBRT treatments over 11 days in an ongoing randomized study. In the United States, several groups have investigated the 5 SBRT approach in 11 days or less and early findings suggest a good tolerance. The study is being done to determine the side effects, quality of life and efficacy of 2-fraction adaptive SBRT technique (2STAR) in the treatment of low and intermediate risk prostate cancer. All participants will receive the same dose and fractionation scheme.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the good and bad effects when regorafenib is used instead of standard combination chemotherapy. It is not known if taking regorafenib versus standard chemotherapy will have better, worse or the same results.