Clinical trial NCT02079779 - References

Acute Stroke — Efficacy Study of an Interactive Robot for the Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Acute Stroke Patients

Citation(s)

•   Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glasberg JJ, Graham GD, Katz RC, Lamberty K, Reker D
  Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005 Sep;36(9):e100-43.
•   Gilliaux M, Lejeune TM, Detrembleur C, Sapin J, Dehez B, Selves C, Stoquart G
  Using the robotic device REAplan as a valid, reliable, and sensitive tool to quantify upper limb impairments in stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):117-25. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1245.
•   Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G
  Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011 May 14;377(9778):1693-702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5. Review.
•   Mehrholz J, Hädrich A, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M
  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD006876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub3. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(11):CD006876.
•   Pignolo L
  Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(12):955-60. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0434.
•   Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe M, Anwar S, Byblow WD
  The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain. 2012 Aug;135(Pt 8):2527-35. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws146. Epub 2012 Jun 10.

Study of the Effectiveness of an Interactive Robot for the Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Acute Stroke Patients by Evaluating the 3 Fields of the ICF: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Simple Blind Study

Details for clinical trial NCT02079779