Early Versus Standard Endoscopic Interventions for Peripancreatic Fluid Collections

Acute Pancreatitis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Postponed or Early Drainage of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections: a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05281458
• Other study ID #: 2021-114
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 15, 2021
• Est. completion date: December 2024

Study information

• Verified date: June 2023
• Source: Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
• Contact: Baiwen Li
• Phone: (+86)021-37798977
• Email: muzibowen[@]126.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Acute pancreatitis is a complex gastrointestinal disease with a variable course that is often difficult to predict early in its development. The majority of cases are mild, self-limited, and follow an uncomplicated course. However, 10-20% of cases can be associated with pancreatic or peripancreatic fluid collections, or both. Infected necrosis complicates 10% of all acute pancreatitis episodes and is associated with a mortality of 15-20%. Current guidelines for necrotizing pancreatitis recommend to postpone drainage until 4 or more weeks after initial presentation to allow collections to "walled-off". However, evidence of infection with clinical deterioration despite maximum support may mandate earlier intervention. It is unclear whether such delay is needed for drainage or whether earlier endoscopic intervention could actually be beneficial in the current approach. The aims of this randomized, controlled, multicenter study is to evaluate whether early endoscopic drainage in patients with peripancreatic fluid collection is superior to postponed intervention in the current practice.

Description:

EUS guided drainage is now the preferred route for peripancreatic fluid collections (PFC). It belongs to transmural drainage and is accomplished by creating a fistula and placing a stent between the gastric or duodenal lumen and the PFC. The size of the PFC and percentage of solid debris were noted prior to puncture, and the optimal site of transluminal puncture was identified using EUS. Participants will be randomly allocated to either the intervention or the control group. Participants in the intervention group will undergo EUS guided drainage earlier (≤1 weeks) in the disease course. The follow-up duration is 6 months from randomization. All patients undergo imaging (contrast enhanced computed tomography) at 3- and 6-months post randomization.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 60
• Est. completion date: December 2024
• Est. primary completion date: September 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 85 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult patients with PFC;

• All patients with PFC will be screened for eligibility including a protocolized approach;

• Patients admitted within 72 hours of onset

Exclusion Criteria:

• More than 30 days after onset of acute pancreatitis

• Pregnant women

• Documented chronic pancreatitis

• Inability to gave informed consent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acute Pancreatitis
• Pancreatic Fluid Collections
• Pancreatitis

Intervention

Procedure:
• Early drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections
Participants will undergo EUS guided drainage earlier (=1 weeks) in the disease course.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine	Shanghai	Shanghai

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine	Ruijin Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (10)

Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. Epub 2012 Oct 25. — View Citation

Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA. American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):67-75.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064. Epub 2019 Aug 31. — View Citation

Hines OJ, Pandol SJ. Management of severe acute pancreatitis. BMJ. 2019 Dec 2;367:l6227. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6227. — View Citation

Hongyin L, Zhu H, Tao W, Ning L, Weihui L, Jianfeng C, Hongtao Y, Lijun T. Abdominal paracentesis drainage improves tolerance of enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;52(4):389-395. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1276617. Epub 2017 Jan 4. — View Citation

Liu RH, Wen Y, Sun HY, Liu CY, Zhang YF, Yang Y, Huang QL, Tang JJ, Huang CC, Tang LJ. Abdominal paracentesis drainage ameliorates severe acute pancreatitis in rats by regulating the polarization of peritoneal macrophages. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec 7;24(45):5131-5143. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i45.5131. — View Citation

Mallick B, Dhaka N, Gupta P, Gulati A, Malik S, Sinha SK, Yadav TD, Gupta V, Kochhar R. An audit of percutaneous drainage for acute necrotic collections and walled off necrosis in patients with acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2018 Oct;18(7):727-733. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 21. — View Citation

Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD. Acute Pancreatitis: A Review. JAMA. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):382-390. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.20317. Erratum In: JAMA. 2021 Jun 15;325(23):2405. — View Citation

Rana SS, Verma S, Kang M, Gorsi U, Sharma R, Gupta R. Comparison of endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage of symptomatic pancreatic necrosis in the early (< 4 weeks) phase of illness. Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Nov-Dec;9(6):402-409. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_65_20. — View Citation

Trikudanathan G, Tawfik P, Amateau SK, Munigala S, Arain M, Attam R, Beilman G, Flanagan S, Freeman ML, Mallery S. Early (<4 Weeks) Versus Standard (>/= 4 Weeks) Endoscopically Centered Step-Up Interventions for Necrotizing Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct;113(10):1550-1558. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0232-3. Epub 2018 Oct 2. — View Citation

Zerem E, Imamovic G, Susic A, Haracic B. Step-up approach to infected necrotising pancreatitis: a 20-year experience of percutaneous drainage in a single centre. Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Jun;43(6):478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Apr 8. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Changes in the Bedside Index of Severe Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP)	Comparison of BISAP changes between the two groups after different treatments. Also compare the number of participants with BISAP =3. BISAP was designed as a predictor of mortality based on 5 variables: blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level greater than 25 mg/dL, impaired mental status, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), age older than 60 years, or radiographic evidence of pleural effusion within the first 24 hours of admission. A BISAP score of 3 or greater was associated with developing organ failure, and a higher scores mean a worse outcome.	1-4 week
Primary	Number of Participants with New-onset multi-organ failure after intervention		1-4 week
Secondary	Rates of mortality		6 months
Secondary	Length of hospital stay		3 months
Secondary	Length of ICU stays		up to 3 months
Secondary	Related complications		1 month