View clinical trials related to Acute Circulatory Failure.
Filter by:Capillary refill time (CRT) is a clinical sign for diagnosis of acute circulatory failure and response to treatment but is also associated with prognosis in patient with shock. CRT is clinically evaluated by physician with a high risk of inter and intra evaluator variations, depending, for example, on measurement site, pressure applicated or visual evaluation. The investigator hypothesizes that CRT measurement with second generation DICART prototype will be well correlated with clinical measurement.
Acute circulatory failure (ACF) is a common cause of admission in intensive care unit (ICU). Echocardiography is a widespread tool nowadays for the initial assessment and the hemodynamic monitoring. An interesting data from this exam is the Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI), reflecting stroke volume, and therefore cardiac output. A new tool for automated recording has been developped on the VENUE GE echograph. This study aims at assessing this automated measurement of LVOT VTI compared with the classic manual method.
The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been declared a public health emergency of international concern. Hospitalized COVID-19-positive patients requiring ICU care is increasing along with the course of epidemic. A large number of these patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) according to current data. However, the related hemodynamic characteristic has so far been rarely described.
International guidelines recommend Methylene Blue (MB) as a second-line drug in the treatment of norepinephrine refractory vasoplegic shock (VS) after Cardiopulmonary Bypass CPB. Macrocirculatory effects of MB in this setting are now well established but microcirculatory effects of MB remain unknown. The purpose of this study is to assess the micro vascular effects of a single administration of methylene blue (1.5 mg/kg over 30 minutes) for norepinephrine-refractory VS post CPB. Microcirculatory effect will be monitored before and one hour after MB infusion through cutaneous refill time, video microscopy measurements of the sublingual microcirculation and tissue oxygen saturation combined with vascular occlusion test (VOT).
Fluid expansion is the first therapeutic option in patients presenting acute circulatory failure but the duration of its hemodynamic effects (persistency and time of maximal increase in cardiac output) is unknown. This study is seeking to describe in critically ill patients, the time course evolution of cardiac output over a 2-hours period after a fluid expansion. The objectives are: 1. to identify patterns of fluid responsiveness 2. to determine the time when the maximal increase in cardiac output occurs during and a after fluid expansion 3. to compare patients' characteristics between patterns Patients with acute circulatory failure will be recruited as soon as a fluid expansion will be decided by the physician in charge and the effects of fluid expansion on hemodynamic indices (cardiac output, arterial pressure) will be continuously recorded through a transpulmonary thermodilution device over a 2-hours period. No changes in ventilatory settings nor vasopressors or sedatives will be allowed during the study. Patients will be categorized into patterns according to the changes in cardiac output after fluid expansion and their characteristics will be compared.
The objective of the present research is a combination of a one-sided test of non-inferiority and a one-sided test of superiority. A stepped approach will be used to evaluate these hypotheses: 1. a less invasive intervention (i.e., no indwelling arterial catheter insertion until felt absolutely needed, according to consensual and predefined safety criteria) is non inferior to usual care (i.e., systematic indwelling arterial catheter insertion in the early hours of shock) in terms of mortality at day 28 (non-inferiority margin of 5%). 2. a less invasive intervention is not only non-inferior but also superior to usual care in terms of mortality. Multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled, open, two-parallel group, non-inferiority clinical trial.
The passive leg raising (PLR) test is a reversible preload challenge of around 300 mL of blood that can be repeated as frequently as required without infusing a drop of fluid. Two recent meta-analyses of many studies have confirmed the reliability of the PLR test to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with acute circulatory failure. Nevertheless, the effects of the PLR must be assessed by the direct measurement of cardiac output since changes in arterial pressure do not allow the assessment of the PLR hemodynamic effects with reliability. Moreover, cardiac output must be measured continuously and in real time. In clinical practice, cardiac output measurement can be difficult for different reasons such as the unavailability of the echocardiography machine, or the absence of any continuous cardiac output monitoring technique at the time of acute circulatory failure occurrence. Recently, it was shown that the decrease in pulse pressure variation (PPV) induced by the mini-fluid challenge (100 mL of colloid solution infused in 1 min) was able to predict fluid responsiveness with reliability in patients ventilated with low tidal volume (<8 mL/kg of ideal body weight). Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that the changes in PPV induced by PLR test could be able to predict fluid responsiveness with reliability in mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure.
The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of estimating the clearance of iohexol as an indirect measure of glomerular filtration rate in patients with unstable renal function in the intensive care unit through analysis of rich iohexol plasma kinetics.
We conducted this study to assess the value of early change in central venous pressure (CVP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.