Actinic Keratoses Clinical Trial
Official title:
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Two-armed, Study Comparing Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Using MAL With Cryosurgery for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Skin of the Face
Verified date | November 2020 |
Source | University Hospital Regensburg |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study is a multicenter study investigating the clinical efficacy of repetitive daylight-PDT with MAL (Methylaminolevulinate) compared to cryosurgery in regard to prophylaxis and treatment of AKs (actinic keratoses) in the face. Patients will be randomly allocated to treatment groups. 5 PDT (photodynamic therapy) treatment sessions (visits 1-5) will be performed within 18 months. In the control group, cryosurgery will be performed at visit 1, and in case of non-cleared or newly occurred AKs at visits 2-5. In the PDT group the patients will apply a chemical sunscreen (SPF 50+) to the whole face and other light-exposed, unprotected areas of the skin. After at least 15 minutes a lesion preparation of AKs (removal of crusts) will be performed and MAL will be applied in a thin layer to the whole face. Within 30 min after MAL application patients expose themselves to daylight for 2 hours. In the control group, cryosurgery will be performed using liquid nitrogen spray in each AK lesion; this will be done at visit 1 and, if necessary, also at visits 2-5. At visits 2-6, the efficacy of the treatment will be evaluated by the observer by documenting all existing and newly appearing AKs in the face.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 58 |
Est. completion date | September 9, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | September 9, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 40 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Written informed consent has been signed prior to or at Screening Visit - Male and female patients with Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV - Age > 40 years - Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age - Women in child-bearing age using highly efficient contraceptive methods (<1% failure rate per year) - Clinical diagnosis of actinic keratosis (AK) - A minimum of five non-hyperkeratotic, non-pigmented AK lesions in the face. - Glogau Photodamage Classification Type II (moderate) - IV (severe) Exclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of porphyria - Hyperkeratotic or pigmented AK in the face - Malignant skin tumors in the face or on the capillitium, requiring treatment - Patients with clinically relevant suppression of the immune system (e.g. drug induced, infection) or organ transplant patients - Pregnancy or lactation - Planned aesthetic treatments in the face in the next 24 months (filler, peeling, botulinumtoxin, skin resurfacing) - Known intolerance or allergy to MAL or to any other ingredient of Metvix® 160mg/g cream - Known intolerance to Actinica® lotion - Photosensitivity - Suspected lack of compliance (e.g. due to dementia) - Simultaneous participation in another clinical study or participation in another clinical study in the 30 days directly preceding inclusion - Concomitant UV-phototherapy - Skin diseases that might interfere with response evaluation of study treatment - Skin sun sensitivity type V or VI according to Fitzpatrick - PDT in the face during 6 months preceding study treatment - Non-permitted medication: - Topical treatment in the face during 4 weeks preceding study treatment with diclofenac, hydrochinone, peeling, 5-FU, ingenolmebutate, retinoids, podophyllin, azelaic acid, imiquimod or other agents, that could interfere with the evaluation of the efficacy of the study treatment, according to the investigator. - Systemic treatment with retinoids - Conditions that might interfere with the ability to understand the study and thus give written informed consent - Rejuvenating treatments of the face during 3 months preceding study treatment, including filler, botulinumtoxin and IPL |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Germany | University Hospital Düsseldorf. | Düsseldorf | |
Germany | Hautzentrum Köln | Köln | |
Germany | Klinikum Vest GmbH Knappschaftskrankenhaus | Recklinghausen | |
Germany | University hospital Regensburg | Regensburg | Bavaria |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Hospital Regensburg |
Germany,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The cumulative number of observed AKs at time points 2 to 6 (3 months after the first treatment to 24 months after the first treatment). | Newly occured AK lesions are counted at visit 2, visit 3, visit 4, visit 5 and visit 6.
The number of newly occured AK lesions during the study are added up, therefore we included the term "cumulative". |
24 months after the first treatment | |
Secondary | Complete clearance of AKs on lesion basis | completely cleared AK lesions
The first treatment ist performed at day 0 The second treatment is performed 3 months after the first treatment. The third treatment is performed 3 months after the second treatment. The fourth treatment is performed 6 months after the third treatment. The fifth treatment is performed 6 months after the fourth treatment. |
This outcome measure is assessed three months after the first and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment. | |
Secondary | Complete clearance of AKs on patient basis | completely cleared AK lesions on patient basis
The first treatment ist performed at day 0 The second treatment is performed 3 months after the first treatment. The third treatment is performed 3 months after the second treatment. The fourth treatment is performed 6 months after the third treatment. The fifth treatment is performed 6 months after the fourth treatment. |
This outcome measure is assessed three months after the first and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment. | |
Secondary | Photodamage parameters (fine lines, mottled pigmentation, tactile roughness, teleangiectasias, sallowness and global score for photoaging) will be evaluated on a 5-point scale according to Dover et al. | Photodamage parameters will be evaluated on a 5-point scale according to Dover et al. at all visits during the study
The first treatment ist performed at day 0 (visit 1) The second treatment is performed 3 months after the first treatment (visit 2) The third treatment is performed 3 months after the second treatment (visit 3) The fourth treatment is performed 6 months after the third treatment (visit 4) The fifth treatment is performed 6 months after the fourth treatment (visit 5) The last visit is performed 6 months after the fifth treatment (visit 6) |
This outcome measure is assessed at day 0 (= the first treatment), three months after the first and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment. | |
Secondary | Visual pain score | For evaluation of tolerability of daylight-PDT and cryosurgery, a pain score (VAS) will be assessed and documented.
The first treatment ist performed at day 0 (visit 1) The second treatment is performed 3 months after the first treatment (visit 2) The third treatment is performed 3 months after the second treatment (visit 3) The fourth treatment is performed 6 months after the third treatment (visit 4) The fifth treatment is performed 6 months after the fourth treatment (visit 5) The last visit is performed 6 months after the fifth treatment (visit 6) |
This outcome measure is assessed at day 0 (= the first treatment), three months after the first and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment | |
Secondary | Adverse events | All adverse events and serious adverse events will be adequately documented.
The first treatment ist performed at day 0 (visit 1) The second treatment is performed 3 months after the first treatment (visit 2) The third treatment is performed 3 months after the second treatment (visit 3) The fourth treatment is performed 6 months after the third treatment (visit 4) The fifth treatment is performed 6 months after the fourth treatment (visit 5) The last visit is performed 6 months after the fifth treatment (visit 6) |
This outcome measure is assessed at day 0 (= the first treatment), three months after the first and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction with cosmetic results | For evaluation of satisfaction with cosmetic results, patients and investigators fill in a standardized rating scale
The first treatment ist performed at day 0 (visit 1) The second treatment is performed 3 months after the first treatment (visit 2) The third treatment is performed 3 months after the second treatment (visit 3) The fourth treatment is performed 6 months after the third treatment (visit 4) The fifth treatment is performed 6 months after the fourth treatment (visit 5) The last visit is performed 6 months after the fifth treatment (visit 6) |
This outcome measure is assessed three months after day 0 and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment | |
Secondary | Skin-related quality of life | For evaluation of skin-related quality of life, study participants fill in the Dermatology Life Quality Index, a 10-item questionnaire for routine clinical use. Patients are asked about the impact of their AK and photodamaged skin and its treatment on their lives. Patients' quality of life is expressed in a single score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 30 (severe impact). | This outcome measure is assessed at day 0 and 24 months after day 0 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03575780 -
Single-Center Study Evaluating Systemic Exposure and Safety of KX2-391 Ointment 1% on the Face or Balding Scalp in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04085367 -
Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Methyl Aminolevulinate Hydrochloride (MAL) 16.8% Cream (CD06809-41) Versus Vehicle Cream for Actinic Keratosis of the Face
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05937529 -
Impact of Madecassoside and 5 % Panthenol Cream in Post Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02520700 -
A Comparison of White-light and Daylight Topical Methyl 5-aminolaevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01538901 -
Imiquimod Versus Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses in Organ Transplant Recipients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01354717 -
Bioequivalence Study of Generic Fluorouracil 0.5% Cream and 0.5% Carac® and Placebo
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00742391 -
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel When Used to Treat Actinic Keratoses (AKs) on the Non Head Locations
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03285477 -
A Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KX2-391 Ointment 1% on AK on Face or Scalp
|
Phase 3 | |
Suspended |
NCT03963102 -
Duration of Ameluz Application in Acral Actinic Keratoses Response
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05923060 -
Imaging Techniques to Monitor Photosensitizer and sO2 Levels During Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT06026358 -
Tirbanibulin 1% Ointment for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on the Back of the Hands
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02622594 -
Bilateral Comparison of Treatment of Facial Actinic Keratoses Using Microneedling and Photodynamic Therapy With Aminolevulinic Acid and Blue Light Versus Photodynamic Therapy With Aminolevulinic Acid and Blue Light Using Two Incubation Times
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00774787 -
Topical Imiquimod Cream in Combination With Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00786994 -
The Efficacy and Tolerability of Oleogel-S-10 in Patients With Actinic Keratoses
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00544258 -
Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate the Extent of Systemic Absorption of PEP005
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04024579 -
Treatment of Actinic Keratosis With 5% KOH Solution
|
||
Completed |
NCT04843553 -
Nicotinamide for Prevention of Pre-malignant Actinic Keratosis in Kidney Transplant Recipients
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03315286 -
Validation of SHADE a Mobile Technology for Monitoring of Ultraviolet Exposure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03279328 -
Evaluating Skin Appearance Following 5-Flourouracil Cream for Treatment of Actinic Keratosis and the Effects of Topical Agents
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02062853 -
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Pilot Study Evaluating the Utility of an Educational Video
|
N/A |