Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01132443
Other study ID # 115902
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 1
First received May 24, 2010
Last updated June 14, 2017
Start date May 6, 2010
Est. completion date June 12, 2010

Study information

Verified date June 2017
Source GlaxoSmithKline
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study was conducted to determine if the bioavailability of clindamycin and its metabolite clindamycin sulfoxide are altered by the concentration of BPO or the absence of methylparaben. This study compared the investigational study product and 2 marketed products:

- CLN 1%-BPO 3% Gel (clindamycin 1%-BPO 3%), methylparaben-free

- Topical Gel (clindamycin 1%-BPO 5%), methylparaben-preserved (Topical Gel-MP)

- Once Daily Gel ((clindamycin 1%-BPO 5%), methylparaben-free (Topical Gel-MPF)


Description:

Clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) are both well-known treatments for acne vulgaris (acne) and are available as single-entity and fixed-dose combination products. The same excipients are used in the gel vehicle formulations, except inclusion of the preservative methylparaben in the vehicle is dependent on geographic region. While these products have been shown to be well tolerated, effective combination therapies for acne, concentration-dependent cutaneous irritation has been associated with the use of BPO.

Clindamycin 1%-benzoyl peroxide 3% gel (CLN 1%-BPO 3%) for the topical treatment of acne was developed. CLN 1%-BPO 3% contains the same concentration of clindamycin and a lower concentration of BPO than currently-marketed products, and CLN 1%-BPO 3% is formulated without methylparaben.

A study to evaluate the plasma concentrations of clindamycin and its metabolites after topical gel was applied once daily for 4 weeks in subjects with moderate-to-severe acne showed that the absorption of clindamycin and its metabolite clindamycin sulfoxide were comparable between Topical Gel and a representative single entity product with the same clindamycin concentration. An in vitro skin penetration study demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the delivery of clindamycin in and through the skin following application of either CLN 1%-BPO 3% or topical gel; therefore, the presence of BPO in the formulation at either 3% or 5% did not have an effect on the percutaneous absorption of clindamycin.

Benzoyl peroxide has been shown to be absorbed by the skin where it is converted to benzoic acid. Following topical application, less than 2% of the dose enters systemic circulation as benzoic acid. The transepidermal delivery of BPO is dependent on concentration and no systemic toxicity is expected due to rapid renal clearance of benzoic acid. Benzoic acid is frequently utilized as a preservative or to adjust the pH in food, cosmetics, and medicinal products; therefore, the limited systemic absorption from CLN 1%-BPO 3% is not expected to notably increase exposure to benzoic acid. Due to the low potential for systemic toxicity and the limited utility of assessing plasma concentrations of benzoic acid, the systemic exposure was not evaluated in this study.

Systemic exposure to clindamycin has been associated with severe cases of diarrhea, bloody diarrhea and colitis (including pseudomembranous colitis), which could be fatal. Several studies conducted with single-entity and fixed-combination topical clindamycin-containing products have determined that systemic absorption of clindamycin is low; however, there have been documented cases of colitis after topical administration of clindamycin phosphate. Clindamycin phosphate is rapidly hydrolyzed in vivo to clindamycin, the active parent compound. Topical application of Clindagel (clindamycin phosphate 1% gel) equivalent to 3 to 12 grams once daily for 5 days resulted in peak plasma clindamycin concentrations that were less than 5.5ng/mL. Multiple topical applications of Cleocin T (clindamycin phosphate at a concentration equivalent to 10mg/mL) resulted in clindamycin serum levels ranging from 0 to 3 ng/mL. The mean systemic bioavailability of clindamycin is less than 1%.

As there exists a potential for different topical formulations to have greater systemic exposure to the active ingredients than currently marketed products, this study was conducted to determine if the bioavailability of clindamycin and its metabolite clindamycin sulfoxide are altered by the concentration of BPO or the absence of methylparaben. This study compared the investigational study product and 2 marketed products:

- CLN 1%-BPO 3% Gel (clindamycin 1%-BPO 3%), methylparaben-free

- Topical Gel (clindamycin 1%-BPO 5%), methylparaben-preserved (Topical Gel-MP)

- Once Daily Gel ((clindamycin 1%-BPO 5%), methylparaben-free (Topical Gel-MPF)


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 72
Est. completion date June 12, 2010
Est. primary completion date June 12, 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 12 Years to 45 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent (and HIPAA authorization) before any protocol-specific procedures were performed. Subjects under the legal age of consent in the state where the study was conducted must have provided assent and have had the written informed consent of a parent or guardian.

- Male or female 12 to 45 years of age at time of consent.

- Moderate-to-severe facial acne, defined as an ISGA score of 3 or greater.

- Able to complete the study and to comply with study instructions.

- Sexually-active females of childbearing potential participating in the study must have agreed to use a medically-acceptable method of contraception while receiving protocol-assigned product. A woman of childbearing potential was defined as one who is biologically capable of becoming pregnant, including perimenopausal women who are less than 2 years from their last menses. Acceptable contraceptive methods included the following:

- Hormonal contraception, including oral, injectable, or implantable methods started at least 3 months prior to screening. If hormonal contraception was started less than 3 months prior to screening, then a form of nonhormonal contraception should have been added until the third continuous month of hormonal contraception had been completed.

- Two forms of reliable nonhormonal contraception, to include the use of either an intrauterine device plus a reliable barrier method or 2 reliable barrier methods. Reliable barrier methods include condoms or diaphragms. A cervical cap is also a reliable barrier method, provided the female subject has never given birth vaginally. The combined use of a condom and spermicide constitute 2 forms of acceptable nonhormonal contraception, provided that they are both used properly. The use of spermicide alone and the improper use of condoms are inferior methods of contraception. Subjects with surgical sterilization, including tubal sterilization or partner's vasectomy, must have used a form of nonhormonal contraception. A barrier method or sterilization plus spermicide was acceptable.

- Women who were not currently sexually active must have agreed to use a medically-acceptable method of contraception should they have become sexually active while participating in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Female who was pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or breast feeding.

- Participation in any investigational study within 4 weeks of Day 1 or who were scheduled to participate in another investigational study in the next 2 weeks.

- Used prohibited medications within specified time period before Day 1.

- Currently using any medication that, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect the evaluation of the study product or place the subject at undue risk.

- History or evidence of skin conditions other than acne (eg, eczema, rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis, birthmarks, tattoos) that would interfere with study evaluations.

- History or presence of regional enteritis or inflammatory bowel disease (eg, ulcerative colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, chronic diarrhea, celiac disease, Crohn's disease, or history of antibiotic-associated colitis) or similar symptoms.

- Had any major illness within 4 weeks of Day 1.

- Anticipated need for surgery or hospitalization during the study.

- Blood donation, or equivalent blood loss (~480 mL), within 3 months of Day 1.

- Anemia or any other systemic disease condition for which a loss of 120 mL of blood over a 1-week period may put the subject at undue risk.

- Considered immunocompromised.

- Currently suffering from any disease or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect the evaluation of the study product or place the subject at undue risk.

- Current smoker or smoker with less than 4 weeks abstinence from smoking and nicotine-containing products.

- Anticipated need to engage in activities or exercise that would cause profuse sweating during the study.

- Required or desired excessive or prolonged exposure to ultraviolet light (eg, sunlight, or tanning beds) during the study.

- Clinically relevant history of or current evidence of abuse of alcohol or other drugs.

- History of known or suspected intolerance, hypersensitivity, or allergic reaction to any of the ingredients of the study products, including clindamycin and BPO.

- Considered unable or unlikely to attend the necessary visits.

- Lived in the same household as currently enrolled subjects.

- Employee of the investigator, clinical research organization, or Stiefel who was involved in the study, or an immediate family member (eg, partner, offspring, parents, siblings, or sibling's offspring) of an employee who was involved in the study.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Clindamycin 1%-Benzoyl Peroxide (BPO) 3% Gel,
Apply topically once daily

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Stiefel, a GSK Company GlaxoSmithKline

References & Publications (1)

Terry M. Jones, Stacy Jasper, and Alessandra B. Alió Sáenz. Phase I study: Bioavailability of clindamycin from a new clindamycin 1% - benzoyl peroxide 3% low dose gel (DUAC 3%) . Clin Pharmacol Drug Devel. 2012;2(1):

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Clindamycin plasma concentrations Plasma concentrations of clindamycin in subjects with acne vulgaris Baseline to Day 6
Secondary Clindamycin sulfoxide plasma concentrations Plasma concentrations of clindamycin sulfoxide in subjects with acne vulgaris Baseline/Day 1, Day 2, 3, 4, and 5 (pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post dost - Day 6)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04321070 - Bio-equivalence Study With Clinical Endpoints in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05755256 - The Impact of Probiotics on Skin Hydration in Youth With Mild Acne Phase 2
Completed NCT05131373 - Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of ORI-A-ce001 for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT01445301 - Study STF115287, a Clinical Confirmation Study of GSK2585823 in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Japanese Subjects Phase 3
Completed NCT03303170 - Non-Significant Risk Study of Sebacia Microparticles in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris N/A
Completed NCT04698239 - Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Benefits of the Milesman 445 nm Blue Laser on Inflammatory Acne Lesions. N/A
Completed NCT02886715 - A Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Terminated NCT02924428 - Venus Versa Diamondpolar Applicator Treatment Followed by AC Dual Applicator Treatment for Facial Acne Vulgaris N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02535871 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Completed NCT02709902 - Study Comparing Adapalene/BP Gel to EPIDUO® FORTE and Both to a Placebo Control in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT02491060 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02525822 - Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac Cream in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 2
Completed NCT02250430 - A Phase 1 Study Assessing Local Cutaneous Effects of SB204 Phase 1
Completed NCT02913001 - The Effect of a Low Glycemic Load Diet on Hormonal Markers Associated With Acne N/A
Completed NCT01694810 - Cutaneous Tolerability and Safety of NVN1000 Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT01769664 - A Study Comparing Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel to Duac® Topical Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT01727440 - Identifying the Genetic Predictors of Severe Acne Vulgaris and the Outcome of Oral Isotretinoin Treatment N/A
Completed NCT01194375 - A Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-107 in Patients With Acne Vulgaris Phase 2
Completed NCT01706250 - U0289-401: Eight Week, Split-face, Study to Determine and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY™ II to PROACTIV™ Phase 4
Completed NCT02524665 - 8 Week Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II and MURAD To Treat Acne Phase 4