Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 1, Single Center, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Bioavailability of Clindamycin From Clindamycin 1%-Benzoyl Peroxide 3% Gel, Topical Gel (Clindamycin 1%- Benzoyl Peroxide 5%), and Once Daily Gel (Clindamycin 1%-Benzoyl Peroxide 5%) in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris
This study was conducted to determine if the bioavailability of clindamycin and its
metabolite clindamycin sulfoxide are altered by the concentration of BPO or the absence of
methylparaben. This study compared the investigational study product and 2 marketed
products:
- CLN 1%-BPO 3% Gel (clindamycin 1%-BPO 3%), methylparaben-free
- Topical Gel (clindamycin 1%-BPO 5%), methylparaben-preserved (Topical Gel-MP)
- Once Daily Gel ((clindamycin 1%-BPO 5%), methylparaben-free (Topical Gel-MPF)
Clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) are both well-known treatments for acne vulgaris
(acne) and are available as single-entity and fixed-dose combination products. The same
excipients are used in the gel vehicle formulations, except inclusion of the preservative
methylparaben in the vehicle is dependent on geographic region. While these products have
been shown to be well tolerated, effective combination therapies for acne,
concentration-dependent cutaneous irritation has been associated with the use of BPO.
Clindamycin 1%-benzoyl peroxide 3% gel (CLN 1%-BPO 3%) for the topical treatment of acne was
developed. CLN 1%-BPO 3% contains the same concentration of clindamycin and a lower
concentration of BPO than currently-marketed products, and CLN 1%-BPO 3% is formulated
without methylparaben.
A study to evaluate the plasma concentrations of clindamycin and its metabolites after
topical gel was applied once daily for 4 weeks in subjects with moderate-to-severe acne
showed that the absorption of clindamycin and its metabolite clindamycin sulfoxide were
comparable between Topical Gel and a representative single entity product with the same
clindamycin concentration. An in vitro skin penetration study demonstrated that there were
no significant differences in the delivery of clindamycin in and through the skin following
application of either CLN 1%-BPO 3% or topical gel; therefore, the presence of BPO in the
formulation at either 3% or 5% did not have an effect on the percutaneous absorption of
clindamycin.
Benzoyl peroxide has been shown to be absorbed by the skin where it is converted to benzoic
acid. Following topical application, less than 2% of the dose enters systemic circulation as
benzoic acid. The transepidermal delivery of BPO is dependent on concentration and no
systemic toxicity is expected due to rapid renal clearance of benzoic acid. Benzoic acid is
frequently utilized as a preservative or to adjust the pH in food, cosmetics, and medicinal
products; therefore, the limited systemic absorption from CLN 1%-BPO 3% is not expected to
notably increase exposure to benzoic acid. Due to the low potential for systemic toxicity
and the limited utility of assessing plasma concentrations of benzoic acid, the systemic
exposure was not evaluated in this study.
Systemic exposure to clindamycin has been associated with severe cases of diarrhea, bloody
diarrhea and colitis (including pseudomembranous colitis), which could be fatal. Several
studies conducted with single-entity and fixed-combination topical clindamycin-containing
products have determined that systemic absorption of clindamycin is low; however, there have
been documented cases of colitis after topical administration of clindamycin phosphate.
Clindamycin phosphate is rapidly hydrolyzed in vivo to clindamycin, the active parent
compound. Topical application of Clindagel (clindamycin phosphate 1% gel) equivalent to 3 to
12 grams once daily for 5 days resulted in peak plasma clindamycin concentrations that were
less than 5.5ng/mL. Multiple topical applications of Cleocin T (clindamycin phosphate at a
concentration equivalent to 10mg/mL) resulted in clindamycin serum levels ranging from 0 to
3 ng/mL. The mean systemic bioavailability of clindamycin is less than 1%.
As there exists a potential for different topical formulations to have greater systemic
exposure to the active ingredients than currently marketed products, this study was
conducted to determine if the bioavailability of clindamycin and its metabolite clindamycin
sulfoxide are altered by the concentration of BPO or the absence of methylparaben. This
study compared the investigational study product and 2 marketed products:
- CLN 1%-BPO 3% Gel (clindamycin 1%-BPO 3%), methylparaben-free
- Topical Gel (clindamycin 1%-BPO 5%), methylparaben-preserved (Topical Gel-MP)
- Once Daily Gel ((clindamycin 1%-BPO 5%), methylparaben-free (Topical Gel-MPF)
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04321070 -
Bio-equivalence Study With Clinical Endpoints in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05755256 -
The Impact of Probiotics on Skin Hydration in Youth With Mild Acne
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05131373 -
Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of ORI-A-ce001 for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01445301 -
Study STF115287, a Clinical Confirmation Study of GSK2585823 in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Japanese Subjects
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03303170 -
Non-Significant Risk Study of Sebacia Microparticles in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04698239 -
Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Benefits of the Milesman 445 nm Blue Laser on Inflammatory Acne Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02886715 -
A Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02924428 -
Venus Versa Diamondpolar Applicator Treatment Followed by AC Dual Applicator Treatment for Facial Acne Vulgaris
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02535871 -
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02709902 -
Study Comparing Adapalene/BP Gel to EPIDUO® FORTE and Both to a Placebo Control in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02525822 -
Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac Cream in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02491060 -
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02250430 -
A Phase 1 Study Assessing Local Cutaneous Effects of SB204
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02913001 -
The Effect of a Low Glycemic Load Diet on Hormonal Markers Associated With Acne
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01694810 -
Cutaneous Tolerability and Safety of NVN1000 Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01769664 -
A Study Comparing Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel to Duac® Topical Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01727440 -
Identifying the Genetic Predictors of Severe Acne Vulgaris and the Outcome of Oral Isotretinoin Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01194375 -
A Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-107 in Patients With Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02524665 -
8 Week Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II and MURAD To Treat Acne
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01706250 -
U0289-401: Eight Week, Split-face, Study to Determine and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY™ II to PROACTIV™
|
Phase 4 |