Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00887484
Other study ID # 114544
Secondary ID C0000-401
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received April 23, 2009
Last updated November 6, 2012
Start date February 2009
Est. completion date July 2009

Study information

Verified date November 2012
Source GlaxoSmithKline
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Argentina: Administracion Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnologia Medica
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability of topical combination therapies in the treatment of facial acne.


Description:

The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability of topical combination therapies in the treatment of facial acne.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 48
Est. completion date July 2009
Est. primary completion date June 2009
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 21 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Male or female subjects at least 21 years of age, in good general health with documented diagnosis of acne vulgaris.

- Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must use a medically acceptable form of contraception Abstinence is considered an acceptable method of contraception.

- Inflammatory (papules and pustules) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) facial lesions.

- The ability and willingness to follow all study procedures, attend all scheduled visits, and successfully complete the study

- Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent (and any local or national authorization requirements) before any protocol specific procedures are performed

Exclusion Criteria:

- Female subjects who are pregnant, trying to become pregnant or breastfeeding.

- Subjects who have any clinically relevant finding at their baseline physical other than acne vulgaris.

- History or presence of regional enteritis or inflammatory bowel disease (eg, ulcerative colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, chronic diarrhea, or a history of antibiotic-associated colitis) or similar symptoms.

- Use of topical antibiotics or anti-acne medications on the face and systemic antibiotics within the past 2 and 4 weeks, respectively.

- Use of topical corticosteroids on the face or systemic corticosteroids within the past 4 weeks. Use of inhaled, intra-articular or intra-lesional (other than for facial acne lesions) steroids is acceptable.

- Use of systemic retinoids within the past 6 months.

- Facial procedures performed by an esthetician, beautician, physician, nurse, or other practitioner, within the past 4 weeks or during the conduct of the study.

- Known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any of the active components, lincomycin, adapalene, clindamycin, benzoyl peroxide or excipients of the study product.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Clindoxyl gel
Commencing at baseline, subjects will apply once daily both treatment arm #1 and treatment arm #2 in a bilateral split-face fashion (allocation to left and right side randomly assigned) for an initial 2 weeks. At 2 weeks, subjects will apply clindoxyl gel to the entire face for an additional 6 weeks.
Epiduo Gel
Commencing at baseline, subjects will apply once daily both treatment arm #1 and treatment arm #2 in a bilateral split-face fashion (allocation to left and right side randomly assigned) for an initial 2 weeks. At 2 weeks, subjects will apply clindoxyl gel to the entire face for an additional 6 weeks.

Locations

Country Name City State
Argentina Centro de Investigación y Prevencion de Enfermidades Cardiovasculares Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires
Argentina Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires
Argentina LUMIPIEL - Centro Dermatológico Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires
Argentina Buenos Aires Skin Ciudad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Stiefel, a GSK Company GlaxoSmithKline

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Argentina, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Erythema (Redness) Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.
Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.
Weeks 1 and 2 No
Primary Skin Dryness Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.
Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.
Weeks 1 and 2 No
Primary Skin Peeling Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.
Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3,Intense.
Weeks 1 and 2 No
Primary Irritant/Allergic Contact Dermatitis Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.
Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.
Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Erythema (Redness) Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.
Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.
Weeks 5 and 8 No
Secondary Skin Dryness Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.
Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.
Weeks 5 and 8 No
Secondary Skin Peeling Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.
Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.
Weeks 5 and 8 No
Secondary Irritant/Allergic Contact Dermatitis Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.
Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.
Weeks 5 and 8 No
Secondary Investigators Static Global Assessment ISGA is evaluated using the following scale: 0, Clear: Clear skin with no lesions; 1, Almost Clear: Rare non-inflammatory lesions; 2, Mild: Some non-inflammatory lesions with no more than a few inflammatory lesions but no nodular lesions); 3, Moderate: Up to many non-inflammatory lesions and may have some inflammatory lesions, but no more than 1 small nodular lesion; 4, Severe: Up to many non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesions, but no more than a few nodular lesions; 5, Very Severe: Many non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesions and more than a few nodular lesions. May have cystic lesions. Baseline, Weeks 5, 8 No
Secondary Total Acne Lesion Counts Total acne lesion counts - includes both inflammatory acne lesions (pustules, papules), noninflammatory lesions (whiteheads and blackheads), Baseline, Weeks 5 and 8 No
Secondary Inflammatory Acne Lesion Counts Total number of inflammatory acne lesions (pustules, papules) at each timepoint. Baseline, Weeks 5 and 8 No
Secondary Non-inflammatory Acne Lesion Counts Total number of non-inflammatory acne lesions (whiteheads and blackheads) at each timepoint. Baseline, Weeks 5 and 8 No
Secondary Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire (QoL) - Symptomatic Domain Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. The symptomatic score (score=0 to 28)=(sum of the 7 individual item scores) * 100/28. Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8 No
Secondary Quality of Life Questionnaire - Emotional Domain Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. The emotional score (score=0 to 40)=(sum of the 10 individual item scores) * 100/40. Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8 No
Secondary Quality of Life Questionnaire - Functional Domain Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. The functional score (score=0 to 48)=(sum of the 12 individual item scores) * 100/48. Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8 No
Secondary Quality of Life Questionnaire - Global Score Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. A Global Score (range 0-100)=(sum of all 29 individual item scores) * 100/116. Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Redness at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Redness at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Dryness at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Dryness at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Burning at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Burning at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Itching at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Itching at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Scaling at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe; 5, Very Severe. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Scaling at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe; 5, Very Severe. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Application of Product at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Application of Product at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 1, Very easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Comfort of Skin at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Comfortable; 2, Comfortable; 3, Somewhat Comfortable; 4, Somewhat Uncomfortable; 5, Uncomfortable. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Comfort of Skin at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Comfortable; 2, Comfortable; 3, Somewhat Comfortable; 4, Somewhat Uncomfortable; 5, Uncomfortable. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Which Study Product is Subject More Satisfied With? at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following choices: Epiduo, Clindoxyl Gel, Both Treatments Equally. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Comparison of Study Products Used in the Past at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 1, More Satisfied; 2, Somewhat More Satisfied; 3, Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied; 4, Somewhat More Dissatisfied; 5, More Dissatisfied. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Decrease of Acne Breakouts by Study Products at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Highly Favorable; 2, Favorable; 3, Neutral; 4, Unfavorable; 5, Uncomfortable. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Decrease of Acne Breakouts by Study Products at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 1, Highly Favorable; 2, Favorable; 3, Neutral; 4, Unfavorable; 5, More Dissatisfied. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Compliance at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, Not Compliant at all; 1, Mostly Compliant; 2, Very Compliant. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Compliance at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at week 8 by answering Yes or No to the following question: Did you use the product every day?. When only one product was applied to the face, subjects were asked to rate their compliance by answering the aforementioned question, rather than rating compliance on a 0-2 scale. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Feeling of Hydrated and Moisturized Skin at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: Did you feel that your skin was hydrated and moisturized while you were on your study product? Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Feeling of Hydrated and Moisturized Skin at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: Did you feel that your skin was hydrated and moisturized while you were on your study product? Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Use of Study Product if Choice to Continue Acne Treatment at Week 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: If you were to choose to continue treatment for your acne, would you use the study product? Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Use of Study Product if Choice to Continue Acne Treatment at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at 8 week timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: If you were to choose to continue treatment for your acne, would you use the study product? Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Use Wtih Make-Up at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, Not Applicable; 1, Very Easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult; 5, Very Difficult. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Use With Make-Up at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, Not Applicable; 1, Very Easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult; 5, Very Difficult. Week 8 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Overall Satisfaction of Study Product at Weeks 1 and 2 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Satisfied; 2, Satisfied; 3, Neutral; 4, Unsatisfied; 5, Very Unsatisfied. Weeks 1 and 2 No
Secondary Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Overall Satisfaction of Study Product at Week 8 Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Satisfied; 2, Satisfied; 3, Neutral; 4, Unsatisfied; 5, Very Unsatisfied. Week 8 No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04321070 - Bio-equivalence Study With Clinical Endpoints in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05755256 - The Impact of Probiotics on Skin Hydration in Youth With Mild Acne Phase 2
Completed NCT05131373 - Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of ORI-A-ce001 for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT01445301 - Study STF115287, a Clinical Confirmation Study of GSK2585823 in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Japanese Subjects Phase 3
Completed NCT03303170 - Non-Significant Risk Study of Sebacia Microparticles in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris N/A
Completed NCT04698239 - Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Benefits of the Milesman 445 nm Blue Laser on Inflammatory Acne Lesions. N/A
Completed NCT02886715 - A Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Terminated NCT02924428 - Venus Versa Diamondpolar Applicator Treatment Followed by AC Dual Applicator Treatment for Facial Acne Vulgaris N/A
Completed NCT02709902 - Study Comparing Adapalene/BP Gel to EPIDUO® FORTE and Both to a Placebo Control in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT02535871 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02525822 - Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac Cream in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT02491060 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Completed NCT02913001 - The Effect of a Low Glycemic Load Diet on Hormonal Markers Associated With Acne N/A
Completed NCT02250430 - A Phase 1 Study Assessing Local Cutaneous Effects of SB204 Phase 1
Completed NCT01694810 - Cutaneous Tolerability and Safety of NVN1000 Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT01769664 - A Study Comparing Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel to Duac® Topical Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT01727440 - Identifying the Genetic Predictors of Severe Acne Vulgaris and the Outcome of Oral Isotretinoin Treatment N/A
Completed NCT01194375 - A Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-107 in Patients With Acne Vulgaris Phase 2
Completed NCT00991198 - The Role of Topically Dissolved Oxygen (TDO) to Ameliorate Signs of Photodamage Phase 2
Completed NCT01706250 - U0289-401: Eight Week, Split-face, Study to Determine and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY™ II to PROACTIV™ Phase 4