Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of a Fixed Combination of Adapalene 0.1% and Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% (Adapalene and Benzoyl Peroxide Topical Gel) Gel in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris
Verified date | August 2022 |
Source | Galderma R&D |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This was a multi-center, open-label, non-comparative study that evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy profile of Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide Gel. Subjects were evaluated at Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Safety was evaluated by spontaneous reports of Adverse Events (AEs), the Local Tolerability Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, and Stinging/Burning), routine laboratory testing (hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis), and monitoring of suspected sensitizations. Efficacy was evaluated by analysis of Percent Change from Baseline in Inflammatory, Noninflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts, and by the Subject's Assessment of Acne.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 452 |
Est. completion date | May 23, 2005 |
Est. primary completion date | May 23, 2005 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 12 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - A clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris with facial involvement. - A minimum of 20 but not more than 50 Inflammatory lesions. - A minimum of 30 but not more than 100 Noninflammatory lesions. Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects with presence of nodules or cysts. - Acne conglobate, acne fulminans, secondary acne, or severe acne. - Underlying diseases that required the use of interfering topical or systemic therapy. - Use of prohibited medications prior to the study unless appropriate washout period was documented. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Phoebe Rich, MD | Portland | Oregon |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Galderma R&D |
United States,
Leyden JJ. A review of the use of combination therapies for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Sep;49(3 Suppl):S200-10. doi: 10.1067/s0190-9622(03)01154-x. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory, Noninflammatory and Total Lesion Count at Month 12 LOCF | Percent change in inflammatory, noninflammatory and total lesions at Month 12 was measured from baseline lesions. The noninflammatory lesion count was the sum of open comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind an open follicular orifice (blackhead) and closed comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind a closed follicular orifice (whitehead). The inflammatory lesion count was the sum of papules (a small, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter) and pustules (a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate). The total lesion count was the sum of inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions. Missing adapalene and benzoyl peroxide data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). | Baseline, Month 12 LOCF | |
Primary | Number of Participants Categorized Based on Participant's Assessment Scale of Acne at Month 6 | Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse. | At Month 6 | |
Primary | Number of Participants Categorized Based on Participant's Assessment Scale of Acne at Month 12 | Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse. | At Month 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Erythema | Local tolerability assessment for erythema (abnormal redness of the skin) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no erythema), mild (1- slight pinkness present), moderate (2- definite redness, easily recognized), severe (3- intense redness). The worst severity scores were generally mild or moderate, and rarely severe. | Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Scaling | Local tolerability assessment for scaling (abnormal shedding of the stratum corneum) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follow; none (0- no Scaling), mild (1- barely perceptible shedding, noticeable only on light scratching or rubbing), moderate (2- obvious but not profuse shedding), severe (3- heavy scale production). | Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Dryness | Local tolerability assessment for dryness (brittle and/or tight sensation) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no dryness), mild (1- slight but definite roughness), moderate (2 -moderate roughness), severe (3- marked roughness). | Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Stinging/Burning | Local tolerability assessment for stinging/burning [prickling pain sensation immediately after (within 5 minutes of) dosing] was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no stinging/ burning), mild (1- slight warm, tingling/stinging sensation; not really bothersome), moderate (2- definite warm, tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat), severe (3- hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort). | Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Participant With Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. | Baseline up to Month 14 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters | Clinical laboratory parameters included hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported. | Baseline up to Month 14 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04321070 -
Bio-equivalence Study With Clinical Endpoints in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05755256 -
The Impact of Probiotics on Skin Hydration in Youth With Mild Acne
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05131373 -
Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of ORI-A-ce001 for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01445301 -
Study STF115287, a Clinical Confirmation Study of GSK2585823 in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Japanese Subjects
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03303170 -
Non-Significant Risk Study of Sebacia Microparticles in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04698239 -
Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Benefits of the Milesman 445 nm Blue Laser on Inflammatory Acne Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02886715 -
A Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02924428 -
Venus Versa Diamondpolar Applicator Treatment Followed by AC Dual Applicator Treatment for Facial Acne Vulgaris
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02535871 -
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02491060 -
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02709902 -
Study Comparing Adapalene/BP Gel to EPIDUO® FORTE and Both to a Placebo Control in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02525822 -
Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac Cream in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02250430 -
A Phase 1 Study Assessing Local Cutaneous Effects of SB204
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02913001 -
The Effect of a Low Glycemic Load Diet on Hormonal Markers Associated With Acne
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01694810 -
Cutaneous Tolerability and Safety of NVN1000 Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01769664 -
A Study Comparing Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel to Duac® Topical Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01727440 -
Identifying the Genetic Predictors of Severe Acne Vulgaris and the Outcome of Oral Isotretinoin Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01194375 -
A Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-107 in Patients With Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02524665 -
8 Week Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II and MURAD To Treat Acne
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01706250 -
U0289-401: Eight Week, Split-face, Study to Determine and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY™ II to PROACTIV™
|
Phase 4 |