ACL Clinical Trial
Official title:
What is the Effect of Vision on Movement Control in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructed Patients 7 Months Post-surgery?
NCT number | NCT05121857 |
Other study ID # | SSC-ACL-002 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | December 2021 |
Est. completion date | December 2022 |
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is thought to have two main roles within the body: (1) providing a physical restraint to excessive rotation and forwards translation within the knee and (2) providing sensory information to the sensorimotor cortex (contributes to motor planning and motor task execution). Therefore, an ACL injury is thought to be not just a physical injury but also one which affects an individual's ability to plan and execute motor tasks. It has been suggested in previous research that following an ACL injury and even post-ACL reconstruction, individuals may become reliant on the visual-motor system when planning and executing movements. Therefore, this study aims to compare an ACLR population against healthy controls to see if it is possible to identify those who may be visually-motor reliant by accessing movement control in the absence of vision
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 90 |
Est. completion date | December 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Male |
Age group | 18 Years to 35 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Aged 18-35 years old - Playing club level Gaelic football or hurling - They must report that they intend on returning to sport at the same or higher level - Able to give written informed consent and to participate fully in the interventions - At 7 months biomechanical testing, individuals would need to have 70% symmetry of both quadriceps and hamstring peak torque as measured on our isokinetic dynamometer with the angular velocity set to 60°/s - Individuals should have already commenced linear running and double leg jumping tasks as part of their rehabilitation - They are currently attending a gym or can attain gym access for the duration of intervention period Exclusion Criteria: - They have not commenced running or jumping in their rehabilitation - Revision ACL - They underwent concurrent meniscal repair, chondral repair or extra-articular augmentation - Serious medical conditions preventing them from completing high intensity resistance exercise - Any previous: injuries to the visual system, concussion, head injury, unexplained seizures or epilepsy - Any previous ankle or knee injuries - Those who are uncomfortable or do not want to hop with their eyes closed (one of the assessment tasks will involve hopping on one leg with their eyes open and followed by another set in which their eyes are closed |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Ireland | Sports Surgery Clinic | Dublin | Leinster |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Sports Surgery Clinic, Santry, Dublin |
Ireland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Time to stability during stepdown task (eyes open versus eyes closed) | Participants will stepdown from a 20cm box and land on one leg. Participants will be advised to achieve stability as quickly as possible and then to remain in that position for 20 seconds. Participants will complete 3 trials on each leg first with their eyes open and then a further 3 trials on each leg whilst blindfolded. Participants will perform this test in the 3D lab utilising using an eight-camera motion analysis system (200Hz: Bonita-B10, Vicon, UK) | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | Joint position sense testing | Participants will be seated and blindfolded. Participants will perform this test in the 3D lab utilising using an eight-camera motion analysis system (200Hz: Bonita-B10, Vicon, UK). The assessor will active extend the participant's knee to between 0-30 degrees and hold it there. The participant will then be asked to replicate that angle 5 times for each leg | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | single leg balance (eyes closed versus eyes open) | Participants will perform this test in the 3D lab utilising using an eight-camera motion analysis system (200Hz: Bonita-B10, Vicon, UK) and integrated force plates (1000Hz BP400600, AMTI, USA). Participants will stand on one leg with less than 15 degrees knee flexion. They will be asked to balance for 20 seconds. 3 trials will be taken for each leg with participants' eyes open and 3 trials of each leg whilst they are blindfolded | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | Quadriceps and hamstrings strength | isokinetic dynamometry conducted on each leg between 0-100 degrees at 60 deg/sec. 3 sets of 5 completed for each leg | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | Countermovement jump- double leg and single leg | Participants will be instructed to jump as high as they can. This will be conducted 3 times with double leg and then 3 trials single legged (for each leg) | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | Drop jump- double leg and single leg | participants will drop off 30cm step (double leg) and 15cm step (single leg) and be instructed to quickly jump off the ground and as high as they can. 3 trials of each will be taken | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) questionnaire | Questionnaire utilised to assess for participants' readiness to return to sport and identify if there are any potential psychological factors impacting their return to sport.
Minimum score 0% and maximum score 100%. Lower score indicates less fear regarding return to sport |
at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | International knee documentation committee (IKDC) Questionnaire | Questionnaire utilised to assess participants' self-reported function. Minimum score 0 and maximum score 100. A higher score indicates higher levels of function | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | Tampa scale of kinesiophobia | Questionnaire utilised to assess participants' fear of movement or reinjury. Minimum score 17 and maximum score 68. A lower score indicates better outcome or reduced kinesiophobia | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | Near far quickness score (as part of visual processing software) | sensory tablet (Senaptec, USA) with preloaded assessment tasks to across multiple visual processing domains including near far quickness task. The task requires the participants to correctly answer a task on a screen 3 metres away. Upon entry of the correct answer, a task appears on a device 70-100cm from the participant. The task will then continue to move between the 2 screens over a 30 second period, with the number of correct responses and time taken to input a response being calculated. The number of correct responses over 30 second test period is reported with a higher score indicating better function | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | Near far quickness reaction time to target (as part of visual processing software) | sensory tablet (Senaptec, USA) with preloaded assessment tasks to across multiple visual processing domains including near far quickness task. The task requires the participants to correctly answer a task on a screen 3 metres away. Upon entry of the correct answer, a task appears on a device 70-100cm from the participant. The task will then continue to move between the 2 screens over a 30 second period, with the number of correct responses and time taken to input a response being calculated. Average response time is calculated for individual to input correct response for a far target and a near target. A lower value indicates quicker reaction time and hence better function. | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | Perception span (as part of visual processing software) | sensory tablet (Senaptec, USA) with preloaded assessment tasks to across multiple visual processing domains including perception span task. The task involves recalling which circles were filled following a pattern being flashed for 1 second. Total score is calculated by the software with a higher score indicating better function | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | multiple object tracking score (as part of visual processing software) | sensory tablet (Senaptec, USA) with preloaded assessment tasks to across multiple visual processing domains including multiple object tracking task. In the task, a set of circles are highlighted to the participant. The circles then spin around the screen in conjunction with other circles before coming to a stop. The participant is then tasked with correctly identifying the circles that were initially highlighted.The software provides a proportional and composite score. A higher score indicates better function | at 7 months post-ACLR | |
Secondary | Reaction time (as part of visual processing software) | sensory tablet (Senaptec, USA) with preloaded assessment tasks to across multiple visual processing domains including reaction time task. In the task, the participant places both index fingers on the screen, a flashing red image indicates which finger needs to be removed from the screen. The participant is advised to remove their finger from the screen as quickly as possible. Reaction times are provided by the software for each side (dominant hand and non-dominant hand) and also as an average between the two sides. A lower time indicates better function | at 7 months post-ACLR |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT01433718 -
Decreasing Knee Injury Risk Factors With Neuromuscular Training
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05395767 -
LIVing Donor Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Study
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03670550 -
Dynamic ACL Brace: In Vivo Kinematics
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06430775 -
Exploring Prolonged AMR in ACL Reconstructed Patients
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04586361 -
Prospective Analysis of Introperative RegenLab PRP and Hyaluronic Acid in Patients With Knee ACL Tear
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06167343 -
Comparison of Semitendinosus and Quadriceps Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01727739 -
Tibial Tunnel Widening in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction-Comparing Two Bioscrews
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03711734 -
Acupuncture ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04137003 -
Laval University Rouge et or Post ACL Surgery Program Effectiveness
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05876013 -
Reduced Knee Flexion Strength 18 Years After ACL Reconstruction in Hamstring Group Compared to Patellar Tendon Group
|
||
Completed |
NCT05048420 -
THE EFFECT OF RAMP LESION REPAIR ON RETURN TO SPORTS IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06456268 -
VibraCool Device to Reduce Pain and Opioid Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT05878652 -
Playmaker 3D Printed Knee Extender
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05542563 -
Mindfulness and ACL Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02913404 -
ACL-reconstruction vs ACL-reconstruction With EAT
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05720949 -
Genicular Nerve Blocks for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Knee Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04753424 -
Semitendinosus Graft as Meniscal Transplant
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04721119 -
Comparing Adductor Canal Block and Adductor Canal Block-Local Infiltration Analgesia for Post-operative Pain Management
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03080402 -
Mechanical Perturbation Training for ACL Injury Prevention
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06194682 -
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Study
|