ACL Injury Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation Of Clinical Results And Imaging Of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Orthopure Xt
Verified date | October 2023 |
Source | Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate subjective and objective clinical outcomes and imaging data of subjects undergoing reconstruction or revision of LCA reconstruction using OrthoPure XT
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 10 |
Est. completion date | December 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | December 1, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients between the ages of 18 and 65 at the time of ACL reconstruction surgery; - Patients aged 35 to 65 at the time of primary ACL reconstruction surgery; - Male and female sex; - First injury of the ACL with impossibility of use of autograft (patellar tendinopathy, quadriceps tendinopathy, goose leg tendinopathy) or refusal to use allograft (Bank tendon); - Recurrence of ACL injury with impossibility of use of autograft (prior use/tendinopathy of the patellar, previous use/tendinopathy of the quadriceps, previous use/tendinopathy of the goose leg) or refusal to use allograft (tendon of Bank); Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who do not consent to be included in the study - Presence of haematological, rheumatic or haemorrhagic disease time of assessment - ACL primary reconstruction in subjects under 35 - Allergies and/or reactions from hypersensitivity or religious objection to the use of porcine derivation - Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli | Bologna |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli |
Italy,
Collins JE, Katz JN, Donnell-Fink LA, Martin SD, Losina E. Cumulative incidence of ACL reconstruction after ACL injury in adults: role of age, sex, and race. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):544-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546512472042. Epub 2013 Jan 9. — View Citation
Costa GG, Grassi A, Perelli S, Agro G, Bozzi F, Lo Presti M, Zaffagnini S. Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Nov;27(11):3679-3691. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-0 — View Citation
Kessler MA, Behrend H, Henz S, Stutz G, Rukavina A, Kuster MS. Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 May;16(5):442-8. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | International Knee Documentation Committee | The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30) | At baseline (day 0) | |
Primary | International Knee Documentation Committee | The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30) | After 2 months | |
Primary | International Knee Documentation Committee | The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30) | After 6 months | |
Primary | International Knee Documentation Committee | The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30) | After 24 months | |
Primary | Lysholm Knee Score | The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100.
Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64). |
At baseline (day 0) | |
Primary | Lysholm Knee Score | The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100.
Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64). |
After 2 months | |
Primary | Lysholm Knee Score | The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100.
Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64). |
After 6 months | |
Primary | Lysholm Knee Score | The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100.
Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64). |
After 24 months | |
Primary | Visual Analogue Scale | is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain. | At baseline (day 0) | |
Primary | Visual Analogue Scale | is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain. | After 2 months | |
Primary | Visual Analogue Scale | is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain. | After 6 months | |
Primary | Visual Analogue Scale | is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain. | After 24 months | |
Primary | Tegner Score | allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports | At baseline (day 0) | |
Primary | Tegner Score | allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports | After 2 months | |
Primary | Tegner Score | allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports | After 6 months | |
Primary | Tegner Score | allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports | After 24 months | |
Primary | continuity of the graft | assess the continuity of the graft with magnetic resonance imaging | After 24 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04519801 -
BFR Therapy for Post-Op Rehab of ACL Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03389685 -
Can PRP Reduce Pro-Inflammatory Biomarkers Following ACL Injury
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04958733 -
Does Bone Grafting at the Time of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction Reduce the Incidence of Post-operative Anterior Knee Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04101682 -
Continuous Vs Single Shot Block After ACL
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05374382 -
A Prehab Strengthening Program Prior to ACL Surgery on Lower Limb Structure and Function
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04068701 -
Real-time Sensorimotor Feedback for Injury Prevention in Males Assessed in Virtual Reality
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03479775 -
Muscle Function and Traumatic Knee Injury in Sports
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05498285 -
Post-ACL Reconstruction Rehab UPSCALER App RCT HPUPM
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05461625 -
ACL Reconstruction With/Without ALL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03491046 -
Molecular Imaging Assessment of ACL Viability
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04342000 -
The Effect of Movement Education on Jumping/Landing Quality in High School Athletes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04993339 -
Clinical Outcomes of ACL Reconstruction Augmented by an Injectable Osteoconductive/Osteoinductive Compound
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03614351 -
Dietary Protein Intake and Rehabilitation From Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03670550 -
Dynamic ACL Brace: In Vivo Kinematics
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06206200 -
The Effect of Cognitive Dual-task Rehabilitation on Arthrogenic Muscle Responses After ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06430775 -
Exploring Prolonged AMR in ACL Reconstructed Patients
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06167343 -
Comparison of Semitendinosus and Quadriceps Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04541940 -
TeleRehabilitation Following ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03497780 -
Longitudinal Assessment of Cartilage Injury and Remodeling After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Reconstruction:
|
||
Completed |
NCT04967937 -
Neuromuscular Training Improves Single-Limb Stability
|
N/A |