Abdominal Fat Clinical Trial
Official title:
Baseline Controlled Two-arm Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Combined Multi-Focus Treatments of UltraShape® Contour I V3 System and VelaShape II Device for Non-Invasive Circumference Reduction
Verified date | May 2014 |
Source | Syneron Medical |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Canada: Ethics Review Committee |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of the Ultrashape system with VelaShape II device for reduction of the waist.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 21 |
Est. completion date | September 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Fat thickness of at least 1.5 cm in the anterior abdominal and flanks prior to initial treatment (measurement by caliper) 2. For women of child-bearing potential: negative pregnancy test in the 24 hour period prior to enrollment and 24 hour period prior to each treatment or FU visit (measured in urine) 3. General good health confirmed by medical history and skin examination of the treated area 4. Written informed consent to participate in the study 5. Ability to comply with the requirements of the study 6. BMI= 30 Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of hypertension, ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, congestive heart failure, pacemaker/defibrillator, abdominal aortic aneurism 2. Current hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, hepatitis, liver disease, HIV positive status, blood coagulopathy or excessive bleeding, autoimmune or connective tissue disease or malignancy 3. Previous liposuction in the treatment areas 4. History of skin disease in the treatment area, known tendency to form keloids or poor wound healing 5. Skin lesions in the treatment area other than simple nevi on physical examination (e.g., atypical nevus, tattoo, abrasions) including depressed scars in the treatment area 6. Poor skin quality (i.e., laxity) 7. Abdominal wall diastasis or hernia on physical examination 8. Abnormal kidney, liver or coagulation functions, abnormal lipid profile or blood count within the last 3 months 9. Obesity (BMI > 30) 10. Childbirth within the last 12 months or women who suckling a child 11. Any acute or chronic condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with the conduct of the study 12. Unstable weight within the last 6 months (i.e., ± 3% weight change in the prior six months) 13. Inability to comply with circumference measurement procedure (e.g., inability to held breath for the required duration) 14. Participation in another clinical study 15. Previous body contouring treatments in the treatment areas |
Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Cosmedica | Pointe Claire | Quebec |
Canada | BC Laser & SkinCare Clinic | Surrey | British Columbia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Syneron Medical |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Subject Satisfaction Scores | Subject Satisfaction Scores using the Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) Scale at each treatment and follow-up time point post treatment: 2 week, 4 week, 6 week, 8 week, 10 week and 12 week in a study. | 2, 4, 6, 8,10 and 12 week in a study. | No |
Primary | Difference in circumference reduction between baseline and follow-up visits | The primary efficacy endpoint in this trial is the statistical difference in circumference reduction between Control (baseline measurement, Vist 2 / Day 0) and two points of follow-up measurement: 2 weeks (Visit 5 / Day 42) and 12 weeks (Visit 8 / Day 112) following the last Tx session. The following procedure will be used to compute the Circumference Difference primary endpoint: | Base line, 2 and 12 weeks post last treatment | No |
Secondary | Adverse Events | Safety will be evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events caused by the treatments | The duration of the study, an expected average of 5 months. | Yes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02143960 -
VelaShape III Device in Comparison to Cryolipolysis for Circumferential Reduction
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01976247 -
A Pilot Study Testing a Noninvasive Cryolipolysis Device Versus a High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Device for Fat Reduction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01239147 -
Effects of Whole Grain on Weight Maintenance
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05973526 -
Comparison of the Effects of Electric Current With Needles and Surface Electrodes on the Abdominal Contour of Women
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT05388617 -
Study To Assess Radiofrequency Diathermocontraction Device For Muscle Stimulation And The Treatment Of Abdominal Fat
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02873104 -
Pivotal Study of the truSculpt Radiofrequency Device for Circumferential Reduction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01318343 -
Analysis of CoolSculpting by Zeltiq for Non-Invasive Cooling of Abdominal Fat Using the eZ App Large Applicator
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03428243 -
Long-term Follow-up Study of the truSculpt Radiofrequency Device for Circumferential Reduction
|
||
Completed |
NCT03811093 -
Comparing the Efficacy of a Dual-Frequency LLLT Device With a Sham Device as a Therapy for Adipose Tissue Loss
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05779644 -
Effects of GLP-1RA on Body Weight, Metabolism and Fat Distribution in Overweight/Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
|
N/A |