View clinical trials related to Wounds and Injuries.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the effect of FDA-approved antiseizure drugs in the brain connectivity patterns of severe and moderate acute brain injury patients with suppression of consciousness. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does the antiseizure medication reduce the functional connectivity of seizure networks, as identified by resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), within this specific target population? - What is the prevalence of seizure networks in patients from the target population, both with EEG suggestive and not suggestive of epileptogenic activity? Participants will have a rs-fMRI and those with seizure networks will receive treatment with two antiseizure medications and a post-treatment rs-fMRI. Researchers will compare the pretreatment and post-treatment rs-fMRIs to see if there are changes in the participant's functional connectivity including seizure networks and typical resting state networks.
Searching for new targets for the diagnosis and treatment of liver ischemia-reperfusion injury.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of receiving the technology-based training along with the conventional therapy to the conventional therapy alone on executive functions among people with traumatic brain injury with mild to moderate cognitive deficit. It aims to answer: - If there is significant improvement in executive function skills among people with traumatic brain injury receiving technology-based training along with conventional therapy when compared to people with traumatic brain injury receiving conventional therapy alone. - To see if the demographic variable has any effect on the cognitive improvement Participants will in the intervention group will be given 45 minutes of extra training session using technology along with their usual rehabilitation session. And Participants in the control group will be receiving the usual rehabilitation sessions. Researchers will compare the changes in the outcome measures between the intervention and control group to see if the technology-based training along with conventional therapy had significant effect on executive skills among people with traumatic brain injury.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of an individualized nutrition intervention package on pressure injury healing rates, prevention of new pressure injuries, complications, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness in adult on home nursing care with pressure injuries staged II and above in Singapore. Study Design: A two-group, non-blinded, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial with a cost-effectiveness analysis. Location/ Setting: Community Participants: Adults (aged 21 years and above) receiving home nursing care with at least one pressure injury (Stage II, III, IV, or Unstageable). 190 subjects per arm Intervention: The intervention group will receive an individualized nutrition intervention package consisting of individualized nutritional supplementation, specialized nutritional education pamphlets, regular dietetic support via home visits or telehealth, and home nursing care by nurses trained in nutrition care. The control group will receive specialized nutritional educational pamphlets, and home nursing care by nurses trained in nutrition care, with or without nutritional supplementation. Outcome Measures: Main outcomes of wound area reduction, and proportion of participants with >40% area reduction at 30 days, 60 days and 90 days. Secondary outcomes include proportion of participants and wounds with increasing severity of PI stages (e.g., stage II to stage III), improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and nutritional status, and incidence of wound infections at 30 days, 60 days and 90 days, proportion of participants with complete healing, mortality and unplanned hospital admissions. Economic Evaluation: The primary economic outcome will be the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per pressure injury prevented, with a time horizon of 1 year for intervention versus control during the period of intervention (3-months) and up to a year. Statistical Analyses: Individual patient level analysis will be performed as per our primary analysis, and we will also perform cluster level analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) will be determined using Cox proportional hazards models and their corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI). Imbalances in individual level data will be accounted for using statistical adjustment in a Mixed-Effects Cox Regression model. Hypothesis: This study aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a individualized and protocolized nutrition intervention package for pressure injury management in home care patients. The findings could inform the development of evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for nutritional care and education in this vulnerable population, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs associated with pressure injuries.
The goal of this ongoing open-label, single-arm, phase I/IIa study in patients is designed to assess the safety of human allogeneic BM-derived MSCs product StromaForte for musculoskeletal injury or/and degeneration. Any male or female with any musculoskeletal injury and/or degeneration above 18 years will be enrolledThe main questions it aims to answer are: To assess the safety after 28±10, 84±10, 168±10 and 349±10 days of injection by reporting the number of adverse events or severe adverse event assessed by Common Terminology Criteria Change from baseline in subjective pain assessment in each injured and/or degenerated area (if multiple injury is reported, each area to be followed up separately) Eligible patients will receive 50 x 106 allogeneic bone marrow (BM)-derived MSC formulated in 4 ml infusion solution of sodium chloride supplemented with human serum albumin to be given locally under ultrasound guidance along with or without 100 x 106 allogeneic BM-derived MSCs formulated in sodium chloride supplemented with human serum albumin to be given via slow intravenous infusion in approximately 30 min. Systemic treatment alone is used when local injection at site of injury is not feasible. Additional dose can be administered.
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the safety and feasibility of providing extra doses of rehabilitation therapy for persons with a recent stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI) and/or spinal cord injury (SCI). The therapy treatment targets to improve arm function by introducing telerehabilitation to the bedside of participants during the inpatient rehab admission period. Participants will use a newly developed functional training system (HandyMotion) to access therapy treatment program directly from their hospital room. HandyMotion is a sensor-based training system that can connect to the TV set in the hospital room, enabling patients to access their therapy training program to practice rehab-oriented games and exercises ad libitum, at any time of the day.
The use of serum biomarkers in the setting of the emergency department (ED) has been well characterized over the years as an adjunctive tool for the clinician in the setting of complex decision making. In this regard, the serum dosage of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) has been evaluated in a series of successful multicenter prospective studies as a potentially useful marker of, respectively, glial and neuronal damage in the setting of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), which is defined as a brain injury (concussion) secondary to trauma with a GCS (Glasgow coma scale) score of 13-15. It seems that both markers are detectable in serum less than 1 hour after the traumatic event, with highest levels appearing at around 2 hours, and are capable of distinguishing between patients with traumatic brain injury from those without acute brain injury after trauma. Furthermore, they seem to possess a high negative predictive value for detection of intracranial injuries at head CT-scan as well as the need of neurosurgical intervention after head trauma. Mild traumatic brain injury is one of the most frequent chief-complaints for patients presenting to emergency departments worldwide. At present, head CT scan is the gold standard diagnostic test for the identification of potentially life-threatening intra-cranial injuries. Although effective in the identification of serious lesions which might require neurosurgical intervention or in-hospital prolonged observation, the extensive use of head CT scan in mTBI has been questioned due to the potential risks related to radiation exposure, as well as unnecessary deployment of ED resources and increased costs, considering that the prevalence of CT-detected intra-cranial injury in mTBI is around 5-10%. For this reason, a number of international clinical guidelines suggest several Clinical Decision Rules (CDR) and algorithms to guide the clinician in the correct management of these patients, in particular in the difficult feat of identifying those patients who don't need to perform neuroradiological evaluation (CT scan or MRI) in the setting of the ED, without the risk to overlook potentially fatal brain injuries. The adjunctive role of these biomarkers has been well characterized in the setting of mTBI. It seems they correlate well with neurological damage as well as with the presence of CT abnormalities, and it seems that they might perform better than clinical evaluation alone. Nonetheless, according to current international guidelines and several systematic reviews and meta-analysis, patients who present with mTBI and risk factors for bleeding and delayed bleeding (such as known coagulopathy, patients on blood thinners or advanced age), need to perform CT scan plus clinical observation or even serial CT scans when the risk of delayed bleeding is considered to be high according to clinical evaluation of the ED physician and according to local standard-of-care and clinical practice. The execution of serial CT scans can be time consuming, expensive for the health-care services, and might pose a significant radiological risk for patients; furthermore, this risk might be unjustified considering that the prevalence of development of late intra-cranial bleeding in patients with risk factors who perform a second head CT scan during observation in the ED is considered to be around 2%. Nonetheless, in this category of patients, clinical observation and the repetition of a second head CT scan is felt to be the safest course of action for patients in order not to overlook potentially fatal injuries. Ideally, a clinical decision algorithm which takes into consideration a serum biomarker with a high negative predictive value for brain injury might aid the clinician to reduce the number of useless CT scans, therefore reducing the observation time in the ED as well as the exposure to ionizing radiations for the patients, while not increasing the number of missed delayed bleedings. At present, the role of GFAP and UCH-L1 in the risk stratification of patients with risk factors for delayed cerebral bleeding after mTBI has not been evaluated yet.
Patients arriving to rehabilitation up to 2 months following SCI will be given (study group) or not (control group) Lyrica (75X2). They will be followed for central pain development.
In Germany almost 1 million cardiac catheterizations are performed each year. These procedures can be done either by a transradial or a transfemoral approach. Today, the transradial approach is the recommended default strategy. Nevertheless, transfemoral access ist still frequently used. The main draw-back of a transfemoral approach are potential access site complications, which can sometimes be life-threatening. To reduce vascular complications ultrasound guided vessel puncture may be helpful. In the "Ultrasound guided puncture of the femoral artery"-Study (US-Parfem) an optimized method of ultrasound guided femoral puncture will be evaluated. In this randomized study the new puncture technique combining ultrasound and fluoroscopy will be compared with the conventional method guided by vessel palpation and fluoroscopy. Primary endpoint of the study is the rate of primary successful puncture of the femoral common artery above the bifurcation and below the inguinal ligament ("first success rate").
The purpose of this study is to determine if a particular method of providing nutrition improves the outcomes of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who have undergone abdominal surgery following trauma and would require nutrition delivered via the bloodstream (called total parenteral nutrition or TPN). The nutrition method being tested is a structured nutrition delivery plan, called the SeND Home pathway, that involves TPN, oral nutrition supplements, and the use of a device (called an indirect calorimeter or IC) to measure calorie needs. Participants will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to the SeND Home program or standard of care nutrition. In the SeND Home program, participants will receive TPN, followed by oral nutrition supplements (shakes) for 4 weeks after discharge. The control group will follow standard of care nutrition delivery that begins during ICU stay and concludes at hospital discharge. Participants in both groups will undergo non-invasive tests that measure how much energy (calories) they are using, body composition, and muscle mass and complete walking and strength tests, and surveys about quality of life.