View clinical trials related to Wound Heal.
Filter by:Evaluating the effectiveness of the existing 'linear suture + wound drain placement' and 'purse-string suture + negative pressure wound therapy' through a prospective comparative study
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of barbed suture with conventional suture in muco-gingival surgeries.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial will be performed to assess the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus reuteri in improving post-surgical wound healing after impacted tooth extractions. The Primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of L. reuteri in improving post-extractive healing. The Secondary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of L. reuteri in association with an antibiotic therapy (amoxicillin) in reducing the incidence and severity of antibiotic-associated gastro-intestinal symptoms.
An Open-Label, Proof-Of-Concept, Study of Baricitinib for the Treatment of Pyoderma Gangrenosum
There has been no study yet on the effect of stingless bee honey (Kelulut honey) produced by Melipolini sp. in diabetic wound healing in Malaysia. Kelulut honey, apart from possessing similar pro-healing properties with other honey, is also found to have a better antioxidant capacity, anti-inflammatory, and free radical scavenging activity than Tualang honey. These effects are due to the much higher content of phenolic and flavonoid substances in Kelulut honey, the key bioactive factors promoting wound healing and preventing oxidative stress-related injury. Australian researchers have also recently discovered a novel source of the rare disaccharide trehalose in stingless bee's honey, which is highly anti-diabetic and antioxidating. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of honey against gel dressing for wound bed preparation among diabetic patients.
To examine the efficacy and safety of sericin dressing with collagen in STSG donor site treatment comparing with Bactigras®. Around 30 patients will be enrolled in this study.
The socioeconomic costs of problematic and delayed wound healing following lower limb amputations are enormous to the society. Lower limb amputations is one of the longest known surgical treatments, but also one of the least investigated in the field of medical science. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has emerged as a great instrument to aid healing. Studies have shown that it has a positive and measurable effect on wound healing following eg. total Knee and hip replacements. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a closed NPWT on incidence of postoperative wound complications, in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation.
This study aims to compare the efficacy and clinical tolerability of two medical devices in gauze and cream containing the aqueous extract of triticum vulgare and polyhexanide in comparison with two medical devices containing hyaluronic acid and silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of acute skin lesions . The reason why the two types of devices are compared is because hyaluronic acid and silver sulfadiazine represent the gold standard for the treatment of acute skin lesions. Therefore, making a comparison between the activity of the aqueous extract of triticum vulgare and polyhexanide and this gold standard of control in the treatment of acute skin lesions, is useful to better define the efficacy and tolerability of both medical devices in order to eventually expand the therapeutic armamentarium available for the treatment of acute skin lesions
This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, within subject controlled design to evaluate the effectiveness of Microsurfaced vs Control cadaveric grafts for coverage of acute deep-partial or full-thickness burn wounds to promote wound healing. This study will be performed in 2 parts: Time to wound bed preparedness through 6 weeks (Part A) and wound site healing, graft take and long-term scar outcomes (Part B). Subjects will be treated with both control and microsurfaced cadaveric grafts on adjacent deep-partial or full-thickness burn wounds.
This study will gather information on the use of microMend® to repair lacerations in children and compare the efficacy of microMend® to sutures for laceration repair. microMend® has previously been shown to be less painful and easier to use than sutures, which are the current standard of care for primary wound closures. Results of this research will inform how the treatment of laceration repairs in the pediatric patient population.