Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03468855
Other study ID # ATI-50002-VITI-201
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date March 19, 2018
Est. completion date October 16, 2019

Study information

Verified date November 2020
Source Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The main objective of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ATI-50002 Topical Solution, 0.46% in subjects with non-segmental facial vitiligo.


Description:

This is a multicenter, open-label study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ATI-50002 Topical Solution 0.46% in subjects with non-segmental facial vitiligo. Subjects will be required to have a clinical diagnosis of non-segmental facial vitiligo effecting at least 0.25% of total body surface area (TBSA) (excluding upper and lower eyelids, mucosal lip areas, and forehead and chin areas covered by the stereotactic positioning device for photography) with at least one area of the face with normal pigmentation. Twenty-four eligible subjects will receive ATI-50002 Topical Solution, 0.46%, BID for 24 weeks.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 34
Est. completion date October 16, 2019
Est. primary completion date October 16, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subject has a clinical diagnosis of new onset or actively progressing non-segmental facial vitiligo or worsening of existing facial lesions within the past 6 months. 2. Subject has non-segmental facial vitiligo effecting at least 0.25% total body surface area (TBSA) (excluding the upper and lower eyelids, mucosal lip areas and forehead and chin areas covered by the stereotactic positioning device for photography) with at least one area of the face with normal pigmentation. 3. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the screening visit and a negative urine pregnancy test at the baseline visit and must agree to use an approved method of highly effective birth control for the duration of the study and for 30 days after last study medication application. 4. Subject is in good general health and free of any known disease state or physical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study assessments or put the subject at undue risk by study participation. 5. Subject agrees to refrain from any other treatments for vitiligo from the screening visit through the final follow-up visit. Over the counter (OTC) preparations deemed acceptable by the investigator and camouflage makeups are permitted. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subject with evidence of poliosis (white hairs) in > 50% of their facial vitiligo lesions. 2. Subject with total facial depigmentation. 3. Subject with spontaneous ongoing repigmentation (documented based on the subject's reporting in the last 3 months). 4. Subject who has segmental vitiligo. 5. Subject who has failed phototherapy. Failed phototherapy is defined as failure to achieve satisfactory repigmentation following adequately delivered phototherapy as determined by the investigator. 6. Subject currently has, or has a history of, skin disease (e.g., psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, etc.) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study medication application or study assessments. 7. Subject has, or has a history of, severe, progressive or uncontrolled autoimmune, metabolic, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, genitourinary (i.e.,renal disease), hematological disease, neurologic or cerebral disorders, infectious disease or coagulation disorders that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study assessments or put the subject at undue risk by study participation. 8. Subject currently has a history of, current, or suspected systemic or cutaneous malignancy and/or lymphoproliferative disease, other than a history of adequately treated, well healed and completely cleared non-melanoma skin cancers (e.g., basal or squamous cell carcinoma) treated successfully at least 1 year prior to study entry with no evidence of disease. 9. Subject currently has evidence of active or latent bacterial (including tuberculosis) or viral infections at the time of enrollment, or a history of incompletely treated or untreated tuberculosis. Subjects who have initiated therapy for latent tuberculosis for at least 2 weeks and agree to continue their therapy through completion may participate. 10. Subject has a history of serious local infection (e.g., cellulitis, abscess) or systemic infection, or history of treated infection (e.g., pneumonia, septicemia) within 3 months prior to the baseline visit. Subjects on an antibiotic for a nonserious, acute local infection must complete the course prior to enrollment into the study. 11. Subject has herpes zoster or cytomegalovirus (CMV) that resolved within 8 weeks prior to Visit 1. 12. Subject has a history of frequent outbreaks of oral Herpes Simplex Virus defined as more than 4 episodes per year. 13. Subjects previously treated with depigmenting agents. 14. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities at screening that in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject a poor candidate for the study. 15. Subject who has an absolute neutrophil count <1,000/mm3, or platelet count < 50,000/mL. 16. Subject unable to comply with the required washout periods 17. Subject who has participated in any investigational drug or device trial, regardless of indication in which administration of an investigational drug or device occurred within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of screening (Visit 1). Note that investigational treatment for vitiligo (in any body area) requires a longer washout 18. Subjects with a clinically significant abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone or free T4 at screening. Subjects under treatment with stable thyroid replacement who have a free T4 and TSH within the normal range may participate. 19. Subject has history of sensitivity to any of the ingredients in the study medication. 20. Subject has a history of, or current alcohol or drug abuse within 2 years of study enrollment. 21. Screening ECG findings of: 1. QTcF >450msec for males or >470msec for females (use of the ECG algorithm is acceptable for this purpose) 2. Heart rate = 45 or = 100 beats/minutes 3. Rhythm disturbance other than sinus arrhythmia or ectopic supraventricular rhythm (ectopic atrial rhythm) 4. Conduction disturbance including PR >240msec, pre-excitation (delta wave and PR <120msec), second degree or higher AV block 5. Acute or chronic signs of ischemia. 6. Left Bundle Branch Block 7. Prior myocardial infarction

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
ATI-50002 topical solution
Topical Solution administered twice daily

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Aclaris Investigator Site Dallas Texas
United States Aclaris Investigator Site Encinitas California
United States Aclaris Investigator Site Los Angeles California
United States Aclaris Investigator Site Lynchburg Virginia
United States Aclaris Investigator Site Worcester Massachusetts

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Mean Change From Baseline in Facial Depigmentation in the AOI (Area of Interest) Based on Canfield 2-D Photographic Analysis From Baseline to Week 24 Mean change from baseline in facial depigmentation in quantified Area of Interest (AOI) using Canfield-2-D photographic image analysis from baseline (Visit 2) compared to Week 24. Facial depigmentation is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 24 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Facial Depigmentation in the AOI (Area of Interest) Based on Canfield 2-D Photographic Analysis From Baseline Compared to Week 48 Mean change from baseline in facial depigmentation in quantified Area of Interest (AOI) using Canfield-2-D photographic image analysis from baseline (Visit 2) compared to Week 48. Facial depigmentation is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 48 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Facial Depigmentation in the AOI (Area of Interest) Based on Canfield 2-D Photographic Analysis From Baseline Compared to Week 4 Mean change from baseline in facial depigmentation in quantified Area of Interest (AOI) using Canfield-2-D photographic image analysis from baseline (Visit 2) compared to Week 4. Facial depigmentation is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 4 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Facial Depigmentation in the AOI (Area of Interest) Based on Canfield 2-D Photographic Analysis From Baseline Compared to Week 8 Mean change from baseline in facial depigmentation in quantified Area of Interest (AOI) using Canfield-2-D photographic image analysis from baseline (Visit 2) compared to Week 8. Facial depigmentation is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 8 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Facial Depigmentation in the AOI (Area of Interest) Based on Canfield 2-D Photographic Analysis From Baseline Compared to Week 12 Mean change from baseline in facial depigmentation in quantified Area of Interest (AOI) using Canfield-2-D photographic image analysis from baseline (Visit 2) compared to Week 12. Facial depigmentation is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 12 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Facial Depigmentation in the AOI (Area of Interest) Based on Canfield 2-D Photographic Analysis From Baseline Compared to Week 16 Mean change from baseline in facial depigmentation in quantified Area of Interest (AOI) using Canfield-2-D photographic image analysis from baseline (Visit 2) compared to Week 4. Facial depigmentation is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 16 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Facial Depigmentation in the AOI (Area of Interest) Based on Canfield 2-D Photographic Analysis From Visit 2 Compared to Week 20 Mean change from baseline in facial depigmentation in quantified Area of Interest (AOI) using Canfield-2-D photographic image analysis from baseline (Visit 2) compared to Week 20. Facial depigmentation is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 20 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Facial Depigmentation in the AOI (Area of Interest) Based on Canfield 2-D Photographic Analysis From Baseline Compared to Week 32 Mean change from baseline in facial depigmentation in quantified Area of Interest (AOI) using Canfield-2-D photographic image analysis from baseline (Visit 2) compared to Week 4. Facial depigmentation is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 32 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Facial Depigmentation in the AOI (Area of Interest) Based on Canfield 2-D Photographic Analysis From Baseline Compared to Week 40 Mean change from baseline in facial depigmentation in quantified Area of Interest (AOI) using Canfield-2-D photographic image analysis from baseline (Visit 2) compared to Week 40. Facial depigmentation is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 40 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Facial Depigmentation in the AOI (Area of Interest) Based on Canfield 2-D Photographic Analysis From Baseline Compared to Post-treatment Week 52 Mean change from baseline in facial depigmentation in quantified Area of Interest (AOI) using Canfield-2-D photographic image analysis from baseline (Visit 2) compared to Week 52. Facial depigmentation is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 52 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in the Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) Compared to Week 4 The Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) is an assessment of the subject's facial vitiligo modified from the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index for the face only at week 4. F-VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 4 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in the Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) Compared to Week 8 The Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) is an assessment of the subject's facial vitiligo modified from the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index for the face only at Week 8. F-VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 8 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in the Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) Compared to Week 12 The Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) is an assessment of the subject's facial vitiligo modified from the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index for the face only at week 12. F-VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 12 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in the Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) Compared to Week 16 The Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) is an assessment of the subject's facial vitiligo modified from the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index for the face only at week 16. F-VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Week 16
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in the Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) Compared to Week 20 The Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) is an assessment of the subject's facial vitiligo modified from the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index for the face only at week 20. F-VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 20 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in the Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) Compared to Week 24 The Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) is an assessment of the subject's facial vitiligo modified from the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index for the face only at week 24. F-VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 24 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in the Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) Compared to Week 32 The Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) is an assessment of the subject's facial vitiligo modified from the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index for the face only at week 32. F-VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 32 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in the Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) Compared to Week 40 The Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) is an assessment of the subject's facial vitiligo modified from the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index for the face only at week 40. F-VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 40 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in the Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) Compared to Week 48 The Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) is an assessment of the subject's facial vitiligo modified from the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index for the face only at week 48. F-VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 48 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in the Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) Compared to Post-treatment Week 52 The Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) is an assessment of the subject's facial vitiligo modified from the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index for the face only at week 52. F-VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 52 Weeks
Secondary Treatment Success Based on the Subject's Assessment of Vitiligo on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) at Week 4 The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) represents the subject's assessment of the noticeability of facial vitiligo during the study treatment period by means of answering the question, "Compared to before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now?" Subject response options include, "1: More Noticeable", "2: As Noticeable", "3: Slightly Less Noticeable", "4: A Lot Less Noticeable", and "5: No Longer Noticeable". Treatment success will be defined as follows: VNS score of 1 or 2 = treatment not successful, VNS score of 3 = treatment partially successful, or VNS score of 4 or 5 = treatment successful. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 4 Weeks
Secondary Treatment Success Based on the Subject's Assessment of Vitiligo on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) at Week 8 The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) represents the subject's assessment of the noticeability of facial vitiligo during the study treatment period by means of answering the question, "Compared to before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now?" Subject response options include, "1: More Noticeable", "2: As Noticeable", "3: Slightly Less Noticeable", "4: A Lot Less Noticeable", and "5: No Longer Noticeable". Treatment success will be defined as follows: VNS score of 1 or 2 = treatment not successful, VNS score of 3 = treatment partially successful, or VNS score of 4 or 5 = treatment successful. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 8 Weeks
Secondary Treatment Success Based on the Subject's Assessment of Vitiligo on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) at Week 12 The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) represents the subject's assessment of the noticeability of facial vitiligo during the study treatment period by means of answering the question, "Compared to before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now?" Subject response options include, "1: More Noticeable", "2: As Noticeable", "3: Slightly Less Noticeable", "4: A Lot Less Noticeable", and "5: No Longer Noticeable". Treatment success will be defined as follows: VNS score of 1 or 2 = treatment not successful, VNS score of 3 = treatment partially successful, or VNS score of 4 or 5 = treatment successful. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 12 Weeks
Secondary Treatment Success Based on the Subject's Assessment of Vitiligo on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) at Week 16 The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) represents the subject's assessment of the noticeability of facial vitiligo during the study treatment period by means of answering the question, "Compared to before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now?" Subject response options include, "1: More Noticeable", "2: As Noticeable", "3: Slightly Less Noticeable", "4: A Lot Less Noticeable", and "5: No Longer Noticeable". Treatment success will be defined as follows: VNS score of 1 or 2 = treatment not successful, VNS score of 3 = treatment partially successful, or VNS score of 4 or 5 = treatment successful. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 16 Weeks
Secondary Treatment Success Based on the Subject's Assessment of Vitiligo on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) at Week 20 The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) represents the subject's assessment of the noticeability of facial vitiligo during the study treatment period by means of answering the question, "Compared to before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now?" Subject response options include, "1: More Noticeable", "2: As Noticeable", "3: Slightly Less Noticeable", "4: A Lot Less Noticeable", and "5: No Longer Noticeable". Treatment success will be defined as follows: VNS score of 1 or 2 = treatment not successful, VNS score of 3 = treatment partially successful, or VNS score of 4 or 5 = treatment successful. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 20 Weeks
Secondary Treatment Success Based on the Subject's Assessment of Vitiligo on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) at Week 24 The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) represents the subject's assessment of the noticeability of facial vitiligo during the study treatment period by means of answering the question, "Compared to before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now?" Subject response options include, "1: More Noticeable", "2: As Noticeable", "3: Slightly Less Noticeable", "4: A Lot Less Noticeable", and "5: No Longer Noticeable". Treatment success will be defined as follows: VNS score of 1 or 2 = treatment not successful, VNS score of 3 = treatment partially successful, or VNS score of 4 or 5 = treatment successful. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 24 Weeks
Secondary Treatment Success Based on the Subject's Assessment of Vitiligo on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) at Week 32 The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) represents the subject's assessment of the noticeability of facial vitiligo during the study treatment period by means of answering the question, "Compared to before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now?" Subject response options include, "1: More Noticeable", "2: As Noticeable", "3: Slightly Less Noticeable", "4: A Lot Less Noticeable", and "5: No Longer Noticeable". Treatment success will be defined as follows: VNS score of 1 or 2 = treatment not successful, VNS score of 3 = treatment partially successful, or VNS score of 4 or 5 = treatment successful. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 32 Weeks
Secondary Treatment Success Based on the Subject's Assessment of Vitiligo on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) at Week 40 The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) represents the subject's assessment of the noticeability of facial vitiligo during the study treatment period by means of answering the question, "Compared to before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now?" Subject response options include, "1: More Noticeable", "2: As Noticeable", "3: Slightly Less Noticeable", "4: A Lot Less Noticeable", and "5: No Longer Noticeable". Treatment success will be defined as follows: VNS score of 1 or 2 = treatment not successful, VNS score of 3 = treatment partially successful, or VNS score of 4 or 5 = treatment successful. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 40 Weeks
Secondary Treatment Success Based on the Subject's Assessment of Vitiligo on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) at Week 48 The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) represents the subject's assessment of the noticeability of facial vitiligo during the study treatment period by means of answering the question, "Compared to before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now?" Subject response options include, "1: More Noticeable", "2: As Noticeable", "3: Slightly Less Noticeable", "4: A Lot Less Noticeable", and "5: No Longer Noticeable". Treatment success will be defined as follows: VNS score of 1 or 2 = treatment not successful, VNS score of 3 = treatment partially successful, or VNS score of 4 or 5 = treatment successful. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 48 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Total VASI at Week 24 The Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) is an assessment of the subject's Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 24 Weeks
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Total VASI at Week 48 The Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) is an assessment of the subject's Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. VASI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with a score of 0 meaning no depigmentation and a score of 100 meaning total depigmentation. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Baseline to 48 Weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05298033 - Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Crisaborole and PF-07038124 With and Without NBUVB in Vitiligo Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05872477 - Promoting Repigmentation After Epidermal Cell Suspension Grafting and preVENTing the Loss of Melanocytes Using Topical Ruxolitinib for Vitiligo in Resistant Areas Phase 2
Terminated NCT04374435 - Evaluating the Efficacy of the Melanocyte Keratinocyte Transplantation Procedure in the Treatment of Vitiligo N/A
Completed NCT04103060 - Safety and Tolerability Study of Cerdulatinib Gel, 0.37% in Adults With Vitiligo Phase 2
Terminated NCT04271501 - Feasibility Study to Evaluate RECELL and Melanocyte Keratinocyte Transplantation Procedure for Repigmentation of Stable Vitiligo Lesions N/A
Completed NCT04530344 - Assess the Long Term Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Vitiligo Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT05008887 - Fractional CO2 Laser-assisted Cutaneous Delivery of Methotrexate Versus 5-fluorouracil in Stable Non-segmental Vitiligo Phase 4
Terminated NCT02191748 - Assessing the Efficacy of Needling With or Without Corticosteroids in the Repigmentation of Vitiligo Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT01382589 - Afamelanotide and Narrow-Band Ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) Light in the Treatment of Nonsegmental Vitiligo Phase 2
Terminated NCT01262547 - A New Micrografting Technique for Vitiligo Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04971200 - Pilot Study Assessing the Effect of Tildrakizumab in Vitiligo Early Phase 1
Completed NCT04872257 - Oral Vitamin D Supplementation Combined With Phototherapy as a Treatment for Vitiligo N/A
Completed NCT04547998 - Clinical Study to Investigate the Safety and Effectiveness of RECELL for Repigmentation of Stable Vitiligo Lesions N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04039451 - Prevalence of Psoriasis and Vitiligo in Assiut Governorate, Egypt
Not yet recruiting NCT03611348 - Microneedling and Latanoprost in Acrofacial Vitiligo Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03199664 - Effectiveness of Narrow-band Ultraviolet B Combined With Topical Tacrolimus 0.03% in Treatment of Patients With Vitiligo Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03340155 - Mechanisms of Action of Photo(Chemo)Therapy in Skin Diseases N/A
Completed NCT03249064 - Response to Tregs in Innate Immunity Receptor LRP1 (CD91) and Tregs in Periferic Blood Mononuclear Cells in Patients With Non-segmentary Vitiligo N/A
Recruiting NCT05635266 - Tissue Repository Providing Annotated Biospecimens for Approved Investigator-directed Biomedical Research Initiatives
Recruiting NCT04246372 - Tofacitinib for Immune Skin Conditions in Down Syndrome Phase 2