Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The standard care in patients with a painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is conservative therapy. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV), is a new minimally invasive technique for pain treatment in which bone cement is injected in the fractured vertebra. Recent RCTs provide conflicting results: two sham-controlled studies show no benefit of PV while an unmasked but controlled RCT found significantly better pain relief after PV at acceptable costs.


Clinical Trial Description

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of bone cement injection in PV for patients with acute painful osteoporotic compression fractures, as compared with a simulated placebo procedure without injection of bone cement. We hypothesize that patients who had undergone PV would report less pain at 1 day, 1 week and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (the primary outcomes) than those in the sham control group.

Study design VERTOS IV is a multicenter RCT concerning the treatment of patients with a painful osteoporotic VCF. Patients are recruited on the Radiology departments of the participating hospitals and randomized to PV or a simulated procedure. Upon obtaining informed consent an independent central telephone operator completes the randomisation procedure, using a computer program. The maximum allowed unbalance (block size) is six, with a maximum sample size of 84 for each participating centre. A total of 180 patients will be enrolled, 90 in each group. This is based on the assumption of a 1.5 point difference in pain relief (VAS Score) and a 20% withdrawal rate (α=0.05 and β=0.20, 7 measurement points). The enrolment of patients will take place in four centres in The Netherlands: St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis in Tilburg, Catharina Ziekenhuis in Eindhoven, Medisch Spectrum Twente in Enschede and Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis in Dordrecht. Randomization will start January 2011 with an expected completion of enrolment by January 2013. There is a one-year follow-up, with the possibility of an extended follow-up at two years.

The overall Institutional Review Board is approval is obtained at the St. Elisabeth Hospital in Tilburg. In addition, each participating centre will obtain a local Institutional Review Board Approval. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov., NCT01200277.

Osteoporosis- and pain medication All patients receive osteoporosis medication, such as bisphosphonates together with supplemental calcium and vitamin D. Pain medication demanded by the patient is recorded. Analgesics are classified following the WHO classification: (1) Paracetamol (acetaminophen), (2) Tramadol, (3) Tramadol and Paracetamol, (4) Morphine. Non Steroid Anti Inflammatory Drugs (NSAID) are only prescribed if patients are intolerant for opiate-derivatives or when already used. Corrections in dose and classification of pain medication are made if necessary.

Clinical follow-up An experienced nurse-practitioner requests patients to fill out a standard questionnaire before and at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. The questionnaire consist of the VAS score and questions about use of pain medication, pain location, and pain type. The VAS score is a pain score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever. Other medical treatment and visits to alternative medical specialists, GP's and physical therapists are recorded and compared between groups. Secondary outcomes are back pain related disability and QOL as measured with the Roland Morris Disability (RMD) Questionnaire and the Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (Qualeffo), respectively. The Qualeffo is developed specifically for patients with osteoporosis. This questionnaire consists of 41 questions about: pain, physical function, social function, general health perception, and mental function. The Qualeffo score ranges from 0 (best quality of life) to 100 (worst quality of life). This questionnaire will be completed at five measurement moments (before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure). The RMD questionnaire is a disability questionnaire that measures the functional status of patients with back pain. The RMD will be completed at all measurement points. All patients visit the internist at 1,3,6 and 12 months follow-up. All patients receive a pain diary. Patients are asked to fill out the VAS score and use of analgesics is recorded on a daily basis during the first month after randomization.

Sample size considerations Assuming a 1.5 point difference in pain relief as measured by VAS score and a withdrawal rate of 20% (α=0.05 and β=0.20, 7 measurement points), a total of 180 patients will be enrolled, 90 in each group.

Statistical analysis The data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Standard statistical techniques will be used to describe characteristics of patients in both groups. We will compare baseline characteristics in the two treatment groups and if incomparability appears, we will in secondary analysis adjust for differences. The primary outcome, significant pain relief will be compared with the analysis of variance for repeated measures. If adjustment for possible baseline incomparability is needed, analysis of covariance will be done. Since we expect the difference between the two groups will particularly become evident at 3, 6 and 12 months, the analysis will also be performed at these time points. ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01200277
Study type Interventional
Source Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
Start date January 2011
Completion date January 2014

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT06287502 - Efficacy of Structured Exercise-Nutritional Intervention on Sarcopenia in Patients With Osteoporosis N/A
Completed NCT03822078 - Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Denosumab (AMG 162) in Japanese Postmenopausal Women Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05845021 - Surgeon-Initiated Bone Health Referral Pathway in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Arthroplasty N/A
Completed NCT00092066 - A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of an Investigational Drug and Dietary Supplement in Men and Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis (0217A-227) Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04754711 - Interest of Nutritional Care of Children With Sickle Cell Disease on Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition N/A
Completed NCT04736693 - Replication of the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial in Healthcare Claims Data
Completed NCT02922478 - Role of Comorbidities in Chronic Heart Failure Study
Recruiting NCT02616627 - Association Between DXA Results and the Complications, Clinical Courses and Outcomes in Chronic Dialysis Patients
Recruiting NCT02635022 - Fragility Fracture Liaison Service and Anti-osteoporosis Medication Monitoring Service Study
Active, not recruiting NCT02617303 - Prevention of Falls and Its Consequences in Elderly People N/A
Completed NCT02566655 - Clinical Trial of Intravenous Infusion of Fucosylated Bone Marrow Mesenchyme Cells in Patients With Osteoporosis Phase 1
Completed NCT03420716 - Symbiotic Yogurt, Calcium Absorption and Bone Health in Young Adult Women N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02223572 - Secondary Fracture Prevention in Patients Who Suffered From Osteoporotic Fracture N/A
Completed NCT02559648 - Denosumab vs Placebo in Patients With Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis Phase 2
Completed NCT02003716 - DeFRA Questionnaire as an Anamnestic Form N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT01854086 - Compliance and Persistence With Osteoporosis Treatment and Attitude Towards Future Therapy Among Post-menopausal Israeli Women During Drug Treatment or Drug Holiday N/A
Unknown status NCT01913834 - Nasally and sc Administered Teriparatide in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT01757340 - Calorie Restriction With Leucine Supplementation N/A
Completed NCT02143674 - Muscle Strengthening Exercises and Global Stretching in Elderly N/A
Completed NCT01694784 - Understanding and Discouraging Overuse of Potentially Harmful Screening Tests N/A