Clinical Trials Logo

Citation(s)

  •   Resnik L, Acluche F, Borgia M, Cancio J, Latlief G, Sasson N
    Function, quality of life, and community integration of DEKA Arm users after discharge from prosthetic training: Impact of home use experience. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Dec;42(6):571-582. doi:
  •   Resnik L, Acluche F, Borgia M
    The DEKA hand: A multifunction prosthetic terminal device-patterns of grip usage at home. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Aug;42(4):446-454. doi: 10.1177/0309364617728117. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
  •   Resnik L, Acluche F, Lieberman Klinger S, Borgia M
    Does the DEKA Arm substitute for or supplement conventional prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Oct;42(5):534-543. doi: 10.1177/0309364617729924. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
  •   Resnik L, Borgia M, Acluche F
    Brief activity performance measure for upper limb amputees: BAM-ULA. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Feb;42(1):75-83. doi: 10.1177/0309364616684196. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
  •   Resnik L, Borgia M, Acluche F
    Timed activity performance in persons with upper limb amputation: A preliminary study. J Hand Ther. 2017 Oct - Dec;30(4):468-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 May 6.
  •   Resnik L, Cancio J, Klinger S, Latlief G, Sasson N, Smurr-Walters L
    Predictors of retention and attrition in a study of an advanced upper limb prosthesis: implications for adoption of the DEKA Arm. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Feb;13(2):206-210.
  •   Resnik L, Fantini C, Latlief G, Phillips S, Sasson N, Sepulveda E
    Use of the DEKA Arm for amputees with brachial plexus injury: A case series. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 19;12(6):e0178642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178642. eCollection 2017.
  •   Resnik L, Klinger S, Gill A, Ekerholm Biester S
    Feminine identity and functional benefits are key factors in women's decision making about upper limb prostheses: a case series. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 May 9:1-15. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1
  •   Resnik L, Klinger S
    Attrition and retention in upper limb prosthetics research: experience of the VA home study of the DEKA arm. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Nov;12(8):816-821. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1269212. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
  •   Resnik LJ, Acluche F, Borgia M, Cancio J, Latlief G, Phillips S, Sasson N
    EMG pattern recognition compared to foot control of the DEKA Arm. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0204854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204854. eCollection 2018.
  •   Resnik LJ, Acluche F, Lieberman Klinger S
    User experience of controlling the DEKA Arm with EMG pattern recognition. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 21;13(9):e0203987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203987. eCollection 2018.
  •   Resnik LJ, Borgia ML, Acluche F, Cancio JM, Latlief G, Sasson N
    How do the outcomes of the DEKA Arm compare to conventional prostheses? PLoS One. 2018 Jan 17;13(1):e0191326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191326. eCollection 2018.
  •   Resnik LJ, Borgia ML, Acluche F
    Perceptions of satisfaction, usability and desirability of the DEKA Arm before and after a trial of home use. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178640. eCollection 2017.
  •   Resnik, L
    Cancio, J. Fantini, C. Ikeda, A. Sasson, N. Pattern Recognition Control of the DEKA Arm in Two Transhumeral Amputees with Target Muscle Reinnervation, Conference Proceedings, Myoelectric Control Conference (MEC), 2017

Home Study of an Advanced Upper Limb Prosthesis

Details for clinical trial NCT01551420