View clinical trials related to Tooth, Impacted.
Filter by:Maxillary canines are the second-most frequently impacted teeth in the dental arch after the third molars. The suspicion of a maxilary canine impaction raises with the absence of the permanent canine in the arch after the normal period of eruption, and has to be confirmed by a clinical evaluation of the patient and a radiographic assessment. The approaches to the management of impacted canines are many, but the preferred approach typically involves surgical exposure and guided orthodontic eruption. The initial mechanical eruption can be achieved in several ways, but an important distinction has to be done according to the anchorage method. The aim of this study is comparing Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs), and cantilevers with a TMA sectional, using the quantification of canines and molars displacement as the main parameter. A TAD is a mini screw temporarily fixed to bone for the purpose of enhancing orthodontic anchorage either by supporting the reactive unit (the anchoring tooth) or by obviating the need for it at large, and is subsequently removed after use. The mini screw employed in this clinical trial will be an alloy type IV titanium screw with 1.5mm diameter and 8-10 mm long, and under local anesthesia will be placed in an area between the first premolar and first molar, on the buccal or labial side according to the canine position and teeth position. For the evaluation of the canines and molar displacement, two CBCT will be required: the first one before the beginning of the traction (T0), the second one after three months (T1). Both the CBCT will be imported in the MIMICS image processing software (Materialize Group, Leuven, Belgium). Limiting the tissue density ranges and restricting the anatomical area of interest, a cropped colored mask will be obtained from each CBCT. Then the co-registration, through the identification of 5 at least landmark points, will allow the overlap of the two masks. At this point, calculating the 3D surface models, the tooth pre- and post-treatment positions will be evident and the measurement of the displacement possible.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a single intranasal (IN) administration of ketorolac after dental impaction surgery.
Research questions: 1. Will the panoramic images derived from cone beam CT data give better diagnostic ability than conventional panoramic radiographs? 2. Will 3D cephalometric analysis offer the orthodontists and surgeons better information for treatment planning? 3. Will the 3D cephalometric analysis give more accurate treatment plan and better treatment outcome? General hypothesis and special aims Overall aims: - To compare 2D versus 3D cephalometric analysis: treatment planning and therapeutic outcome. - To determine the accuracy and diagnostic ability and usability of the 3D cephalometric analysis. - To evaluate the diagnostic ability and usability of the panoramic image derived from cone beam CT data as compared to 2D panoramic images. - To evaluate the value of the cone beam CT data in cephalometric analysing process for orthodontic and maxillofacial surgery treatment. Hypotheses: 1. The availability of the 3D cephalometric analysis influences the orthodontic and maxillofacial treatment plan and decision, and might change the treatment outcome. 2. Panoramic images derived from cone beam CT data may provide equal information for diagnosis as conventional panoramic images. 3. Cone beam CT will be able to replace "classic orthodontic imaging" being more time and dose efficient and having a beneficial effect on treatment outcome.
The purpose of this pilot clinical trial is to evaluate whether alveolar-decortication has the potential to reduce orthodontic treatment time following surgical exposure of palatally impacted canines.
The purpose of this investigation is an exact preoperative 3D-localisation of impacted and supernumerary teeth in the maxilla using Cone Beam Computer Tomography
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of single IV doses of N1539 after dental impaction surgery.
Background: Routine oral examination (ROE) refers to periodic monitoring of the general and oral health status of patients. In most developed Western countries a decreasing prevalence of oral diseases underpins the need for a more individualised approach in assigning recall intervals for regular attendees instead of systematic decision making of fixed intervals. From a quality of care perspective as well, one can also question the effectiveness of the widespread prophylactic removal of mandibular impacted asymptomatic third molars (MIM) in adolescents and adults. It is as yet unclear how quality of oral care can be improved. Research data on effectiveness of interventions to promote continuing professional development for dentists are rare. Methods/Design: This implementation study is a cluster randomised controlled trial with groups of GDPs as the unit of randomisation. The aim of the study is to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of small group quality improvement on professional decision making of general dental practitioners (GDPs) in daily practice. Six peer groups ('IQual-groups') shall be randomised either to the intervention group I or group II. Groups of GDPs allocated to either of these arms act as each other's control group. An IQual peer group consists of 8-10 GDPs who attend in monthly structured sessions scheduled for discussion on practice related topics. GDPs in both trail arms receive recent developed evidence-based CPG on ROE or MIM respectively. The implementation strategy consists of 1 interactive IQual circle meeting of mostly 2-3 hours. In addition, both groups of GDPs receive feedback on personal and group characteristics and are invited to make use of web-based patient vignettes for further individual training on risk assessment policy. A few weeks after the interactive meeting reminders (flow charts) will be send by mail. The main outcome measure for the ROE-study and control group is the use and appropriateness of individualised risk assessment in assigning recall intervals and for the MIM-study the use and appropriateness of individualised mandibular impacted third molar risk management. Measurements (pre-intervention data collection) will take place in months 1-3, starting in September 2006. Post-intervention data collection will be performed after 9 months. Discussion: In most developed Western countries a decreasing prevalence of oral diseases underpins the need for a more individualised approach in assigning recall intervals for regular attendees. If the evaluation of this multifaceted implementation study reveals a shift in individual performance of GDPs in assessing risks for oral disease, further research questions and efforts to a risk-based professional education could be promoted. Scientific hypothesis Multifaceted implementation of consensus based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for GDPs on ROEs and the management of asymptomatic impacted third molars (MIM) in daily dental practice is more effective and efficient compared to only dissemination of CPGs.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether equal subanesthetic doses of racemic ketamine is equally effective on females and males after surgical removal of third molars
The purpose of this study is to test whether the two MMPs can be up-regulated during orthodontic treatment. Alveolar bone samples will be collected from partially impacted third molars after orthodontic uprighting for different periods of time in volunteers.
This study will examine whether bradykinin receptors are produced at the site of wisdom tooth extraction and if they contribute to the amount of inflammation and pain that follows surgery. Bradykinin is a molecule produced by enzymes at the site of an injury and then binds to receptors to cause pain. The study will also evaluate the role of genetic factors in the production of bradykinin and their receptors and the pain associated with minor surgical procedures. Patients between 16 and 35 years of age who are referred to the NIH dental clinic for removal of two wisdom teeth may be eligible for this study. Candidates must be in good health and must not be allergic to aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sulfites, or amide anesthetics. They will be screened with a medical history and oral examination, including x-rays to confirm the need for wisdom tooth extraction. On the morning of surgery following an overnight fast, participants have a blood sample drawn to extract DNA for gene studies. Just before surgery, they are given an intravenous (IV) sedative to induce drowsiness and a local anesthetic to numb the mouth. They are also given IV either Ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or placebo, a look-alike medication with no active ingredient. After the extractions, a small piece of plastic tubing is placed in both extraction sites, and every 20 minutes for the next 3 hours inflammatory fluid is collected from the tubing for measuring chemicals believed to cause pain and swelling. Patients rate their pain by answering pain-related questions every 20 minutes. Patients who have pain that is not relieved by the study medication (Ketorolac or placebo) are given, upon request, 50 mg of the pain reliever tramadol (Ultram). Patients remain in the clinic for at least 3 hours and no more than 7 hours after surgery in order for monitoring the effects of the study drugs as the local anesthetic wears off. Patients undergo two biopsies during the study - one before and one after the extraction - to measure any changes in chemicals produced in response to the surgery. The second biopsy is done either 3, 7, or 24 hours after the extraction. Patients in the 3- and 7-hour groups are given a small dose of local anesthetic in the gum for the second biopsy and remain in the clinic until the biopsy is done; those in the 24-hour group are given forms to record pain ratings at home and return to the clinic the following morning for a 2-hour follow-up visit. All patients are given standard pain medication (flurbiprofen) to take at home.