View clinical trials related to Stomach Neoplasms.
Filter by:This clinical trial is looking at UCB4594. This is the first time the drug is being tested in humans. UCB4594 is a type of drug called a monoclonal antibody. It has been designed to work by targeting a protein called human leucocyte antigen G (HLA-G) that is found in high levels on some cancer cells. By attaching itself to this protein it may help the immune system to attack and kill the cancer cells. The four main aims of the clinical trial are to find out: 1. The best dose of UCB4594 that can be given safely to participants in the trial. 2. What the side effects of UCB4594 are and how they can be managed. 3. What happens to UCB4594 inside the body and how it affects cancer cells. 4. Whether UCB4594 can cause cancer to shrink.
Extensive research employing diverse omics methodologies has unveiled a varied landscape of gastric cancer (GC). Recent progress in next-generation sequencing and other genomic technologies has facilitated a more intricate exploration of GC at the molecular level. This study aimed to identify the most effective drug therapeutics for patients with the mesenchymal subtype of gastric cancer.Based on RNA-seq transcriptome, 234 patients were divided into four molecular subtypes: mesenchymal, immunogenic, metabolic, and classic.Our analysis has revealed that, for neoadjuvant therapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the mesenchymal subtype stands out as the ideal patient population benefiting from Apatinib, without a concurrent increase in postoperative complications.
To evaluate the efficacy of Tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of patients with MHC-II positive (IHC≥2+) and locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma by evaluating the main pathologic response rate (MPR).
The regimen of Albumin paclitaxel+SOX+BEV neoadjuvant therapy lasted for 6 cycles, during which PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy was interspersed for 4 cycles for locally advanced diffuse gastric cancer.
The purpose of this study is to create a registry of participants with precursor lesions for gastric cancer, including gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia. Normal controls and individuals with gastric cancer for comparison of baseline characteristics will also be enrolled.
Background: Gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are more vulnerable to perioperative stress. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is widely used in surgical patients aiming at reducing stress responses. However, whether this approach is safe and feasible for gastric cancer patients received minimally invasive radical gastrectomy after NACT remained determined. So, the objective of this study is to investigate the effects of ERAS for this special group of gastric cancer patients. Materials and Methods: The data of gastric cancer patients who underwent minimally invasive radical gastrectomy after NACT were collected in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into an ERAS group and a conventional group based on whether they received perioperative ERAS management. Propensity score matching was conducted to eliminate bias. Pre- and postoperative inflammatory and nutritional marker levels, postoperative complications, recovery indices and 3-year OS and RFS were observed.
The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum containing dual drugs are more used as a first-line therapeutic approach for patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer for its superior efficacy. However, there are no standard recommendations for subsequent treatment after progression on first-line therapy. Here, the investigators conduct this open-label, monocenter, single arm phase II study to evaluate whether sintilimab in combination with irinotecan, leucovorin folinate and fluorouracil can be the salvage therapy for patients diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer progression on first-line therapy. Patients participated in this study will receive sintilimab 3mg/kg for patients with body weight<60kg or 200mg for patients with body weight ≥ 60kg, plus irinotecan 180mg/m2 intravenous infusion, leucovorin folinate 400mg/m2 intravenous infusion and fluorouracil 400mg/m2 intravenous injection followed by 2400mg/m2 intravenous infusion for 48 hours, repeated every two weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). The investigators estimated that 40 patients were necessary. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate and safety for unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer.
This phase I trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of azenosertib in combination with trastuzumab deruxtecan in treating patients with HER2-positive and cyclin E amplified gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and other HER2-positive solid tumors that have spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced), that have spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic), or that cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable). Azenosertib is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It inhibits a protein called Wee1. Inhibition of the Wee1 protein can make tumor cells more vulnerable to chemotherapy drugs, leading to tumor cell death. Trastuzumab deruxtecan is in a class of medications called antibody-drug conjugates. It is composed of a monoclonal antibody, called trastuzumab, linked to a chemotherapy drug, called deruxtecan. Trastuzumab attaches to HER2 positive cancer cells in a targeted way and delivers deruxtecan to kill them. Giving azenosertib in combination with trastuzumab deruxtecan may be safe, tolerable, and/or more effective in treating patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or unresectable HER2-positive gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or other solid tumors, compared to just trastuzumab deruxtecan alone.
The object of this exploratory clinical trial is to evaluate intra and post-operative complications in a population that underwent Robotic Gastrectomy, with multiple platforms: - DaVinci; - Hugo; - Versius. This study is divided into two phases: in the first phase, gastrectomy will be performed using both the new platforms (Hugo and Versius) and the standard platform (Da Vinci), to evaluate the feasibility of the surgical procedure. In the second phase, the three platforms will be compared to evaluate any differences in the learning curve for an upper-GI surgeon, expert in laparoscopic surgery but not with robotic one. The questions it aims to answer are: - Are differences (intra-operative, post-operative, oncological, functional, technical, and economic) among the three different platforms observable? - Are there any differences between the three platforms related to the learning curve for surgeons? Participants will be enrolled, after obtaining informed consent, in one of the following cohorts: 1. surgery with the daVinci platform; 2. surgery with the Hugo platform; 3. surgery with the Versius platform.
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will undergo laparoscopic proximal gastric cancer radical surgery, and esophagogastric anastomosis will be performed using the ThTV method. Review the surgical video and record the time for making the extracorporeal muscle flap, tunnel passage time, and anastomosis time. The production time of the muscle flap is based on the electric knife incision of the muscle flap as the starting point, and successfully penetrating the muscle flap as the endpoint. The tunnel passes through time, pulling the residual end of the esophagus, and starting to pass through the gastric muscle flap tunnel as the time starting point. The complete placement of the gastric tube into the lower mediastinum is used as the time endpoint. The anastomosis time is calculated from the first needle of suturing the residual stomach and the posterior wall of the esophagus until the end of the plasma flap suturing. Record perioperative indicators such as surgical time, bleeding volume, and postoperative hospital stay. The definition of anastomotic stenosis is that in gastroscopy, those who cannot pass through the anastomotic site with ultra-fine endoscopy are judged as anastomotic stenosis. Postoperative pathology was performed using the 8th edition AJCC staging. Follow up every three months after surgery, including blood tests, liver and kidney function, and tumor markers. According to the situation, choose gastroscopy, upper gastrointestinal imaging, and chest abdominal pelvic enhanced CT. Evaluate postoperative reflux symptoms such as heartburn and sternal pain using the Visick grading system. Gastroscopy Los Angeles grading was used to evaluate postoperative reflux esophagitis.