View clinical trials related to Solid Tumors.
Filter by:In the dose escalation phase (Part 1), this study will determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 (RPII) dose of NC 6004 in combination with gemcitabine. In the expansion phase of the study (Part 2), study will evaluate the activity, safety, and tolerability at the RPII dose identified in Part 1 in patients with squamous NSCLC, biliary tract, and bladder cancer.
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy when combining MK-3475 and INCB024360 in participants with certain cancers. This study was conducted in 2 phases, Phase 1 and Phase 2.
This is a Phase 1 study of eribulin mesylate in pediatric participants with recurrent or refractory solid tumors (excluding CNS), including lymphomas. Eribulin mesylate will be administered intravenously, once per day on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. This study aims to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of this regimen in Part A1 (participants greater than or equal to [>=] 12 months and less than [<] 18 years). Part A2 will enroll infants (greater than [>] 6 months and <12 months) one dose level behind the dose level at which participants in Part A1 are enrolling, in order to maximize safety for infant participants. Additionally, this study aims to describe the toxicities and the pharmacokinetics of eribulin mesylate when administered to children. In a preliminary manner, the antitumor effect of eribulin mesylate will also be described.
This is a first-in-human, open label, single arm, sequential dose escalation and expansion study of oral DFP-11207 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Patients who had clinical benefit following a single infusion of CP-870, 893 on Protocol UPCC 10903 will receive a single repeated infusion of CP-870,893 at the same dose given on UPCC 10903 intravenously.
The main aim of this study is to observe correction of the hemoglobin level in the patients under chemotherapy, treated with epoetin alfa biosimilar and presenting with a solid tumor or a lymphoma or a myeloma.
In this phase III non-inferiority trial, the aim is to evaluate whether metoclopramide and palonosetron prophylactic antemetic treatment are non-inferior to dexamethasone with regard to its efficacy to prevent delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) induced by non- anthracyclines plus cyclophosphamide (AC) based moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).
This is a 5-part dose-finding and preliminary efficacy study of pembrolizumab (Pembro) + dabrafenib (D) + trametinib (T) for participants with advanced melanoma and solid tumors. Parts 1 and 2 are open-label to find and confirm the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/maximum administered dose (MAD) for Pembro+D+T. The primary hypothesis (Parts 1 and 2) is that Pembro+D+T is sufficiently well-tolerated to permit clinical investigation. Part 3 is a double-blind study of Pembro+D+T versus placebo+D+T. The primary study hypothesis (Part 3 only) is that the Pembro+D+T improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo+D+T. Part 4 is nonrandomized and open-label and is designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability and identify the MTD or MAD of Pembro+T in participants who have v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 [BRAF] mutation-negative (without V600 E or K) melanoma or solid tumors [irrespective of BRAF status]. The primary hypothesis (Part 4) is that Pembro+T is sufficiently well-tolerated to permit clinical investigation. Part 5 will confirm the dose(s) identified in Part 4 in participants BRAF wild type [without V600E or K] melanoma or solid tumors [irrespective of BRAF status] and will further evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy (Objective Response Rate [ORR]) of Pembro+T in participants who have BRAF wild type [without V600E or K] melanoma or solid tumors [irrespective of BRAF status]. The primary hypotheses (Part 5) are that Pembro+T is sufficiently well-tolerated at the MTD/MAD to permit further clinical investigation and is effective in attaining objective responses based upon Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 by Investigator review in participants who have melanoma without BRAF V600 E or K mutations. With Amendment 5 (21-Mar-2019), the Part 5 expansion cohort will not be pursued following the completion of Part 5 dose confirmation. Parts 1 and 2 of the study may also explore, if needed based on tolerability, the backup combinations of open-label Pembro+T (for BRAF mutation-negative participants) or Pembro+D (for BRAF mutation-positive participants). These will run concurrently with the Pembro+D+T arm.
The purpose of this dose-escalation study is to assess the safety and tolerability of treatment with Chiauranib administered orally over a range of doses in patients with advanced solid tumors.
The study allowed continued safety follow-up of patients who were on single agent dovitinib or dovitinib in combination with fulvestrant treatment in a Novartis-sponsored study which had met its primary endpoint and were benefiting from the treatment as judged by the investigator.