View clinical trials related to Sleep Apnea Syndromes.
Filter by:Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in children is a prevalent sleep disorder associated with a wide spectrum of morbidities, including neurobehavioural, cardiovascular, and metabolic complications. Positional OSA (POSA) is one of the distinct clinical phenotypes in which obstructive respiratory events occur predominantly while sleeping in the supine position. As the majority of the OSA events in POSA occur in the supine position, positional therapy has become a reasonable non-invasive treatment strategy. The primary objectives of our study are 1) To investigate the feasibility of positional therapy in children with positional OSA; 2) To investigate the efficacy of positional therapy in children with positional OSA. Hypothesis to be tested: 1) Positional therapy is feasible in children with positional OSA. 2) Positional therapy is efficacious in children with positional OSA by reducing the severity of the OSA as measured by the obstructive apnoea hypopnoea index. Design and subjects: A prospective case-control study. 20 children aged 6 to 17 years of age with positional OSA (POSA) will be invited to join the study. Primary outcome measures: Feasibility of the use of positional device therapy; the change in the OAHI between the baseline diagnostic PSG and the home sleep study using a positional device therapy. Statistical Analysis: Continuous data will be presented as mean and standard deviation or median with the interquartile range depending on its distribution, whereas categorical data will be shown as proportions. Changes in sleep study parameters between the baseline PSG and the home sleep study using the positional device will be compared using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Within-subject differences in the secondary outcome parameters will be tested by paired t-tests, McNemar tests, and marginal homogeneity tests for continuous, dichotomous, and categorical data respectively. Expected results: Positional therapy is practicable and efficacious in children with positional OSA by reducing the severity of the OSA.
Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) exhibits variable susceptibility to end-organ morbidities. Previous studies suggest that physiological sequelae in individuals with OSA promote changes in microbiome, which also interact with metabolic and inflammatory mediators. Therefore, microbiome and metabolomic profiling could potentially reveal the pathological processes underlying OSA. The primary objectives of our study are 1)To investigate the differences in the composition of nasal and stool microbiome between children with OSA and non-OSA controls; 2)To investigate the differences in the urine metabolomic profiles between children with OSA and non-OSA controls. Hypothesis to be tested: The microbiome composition and urine metabolomic profiles are different between children with OSA and non-OSA controls. Changes in microbiome composition are associated with specific urine metabolomic and inflammatory profiles in children with OSA. Design and subjects: A prospective case-control study. Chinese children aged 6-11 years old with habitual snoring and polysomnography (PSG) confirmed OSA will be recruited as cases. Non-OSA healthy children will be recruited as controls. All subjects will undergo evaluation including questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, PSG, blood, urine, nasal and stool sampling. Primary outcome measures: Microbiome and metabolomic profiles in children with OSA compared to non-OSA controls. Analysis: Comparisons of the microbiome and metabolomic profiles between OSA children and controls. Correlations of microbiome and metabolomic profiles with inflammatory biomarkers and PSG measurements will be evaluated by regression analysis. Expected results: This study will provide novel data regarding microbiome and metabolomic profiles, and their relationship with inflammatory biomarkers in children with OSA.
A recent development is same-day discharge in bariatric surgery, this seems to be safe if proper discharge criteria are used. However, yet there is no guideline for these discharge criteria, including for patients with (potential) Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). To establish proper discharge criteria concerning OSA more information about (changes in) OSA during the first days after bariatric surgery is required. The aim of this study is to assess postoperative Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) changes during the first and third night after Same-Day Discharge bariatric surgery in patients with potentially untreated OSA. Methods: Patients (n=60) will undergo a Home Sleep Apnea test , pre-operatively and during the first en third postoperative night after bariatric surgery to asses the AHI and sleep architecture.
This study investigates the changes in difficult airway markers at 6 months post operatively in patients undergoing obstructive sleep apnoea surgery
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy works for blood pressure (BP) control in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) adult patients plus undiagnosed hypertension (HBP), using a cuffless bracelet for continual optical BP monitoring (AKTIIA OBPM). It will also learn if CPAP improves cardiac function in these patients using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and to learn about ease of use and patient experience with AKTIIA device and AKTIIA OBPM. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does CPAP reduce systolic BP (and other BP metrics) in this population? - Does CPAP improve cardiac function in the same population? Researchers will compare BP metrics derived from AKTIIA OBPM and STE metrics in a before and after CPAP therapy to evaluate its therapeutic effect. Participants will: - Take a CPAP titration and telemonitoring program for 12 weeks (from the titration date) - Take an AKTIIA OBPM one week before CPAP and 12 weeks since CPAP titration date - Take a STE test twice, before starting CPAP and 12 weeks after CPAP titration date - Take an online survey about easy of use and patient experience with AKTIIA OBPM device
The goal of this observational study is to further evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of action of the Cryosa Procedure, a novel procedure intended to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The patient population includes participants with OSA who are enrolled in the ARCTIC-3 study and are undergoing the Cryosa Procedure. The main questions we aim to answer are: (1) evaluate predictors of successful treatment with the Cryosa Procedure, which is described in more detail in the ARCTIC-3 protocol (IRB #854182), and (2) evaluate a potential mechanism of action of this novel therapy. We hypothesize that higher baseline quantities of oropharyngeal fat and higher baseline upper airway neurotonic activity will be correlated with a successful reduction in OSA symptom severity as measured by a change in apnea-hypopnea index values. We also hypothesize that responders will have a decrease in oropharyngeal fat, which would indicate the mechanism of action of this novel therapy is a loss in oropharyngeal fat. Participants will be asked to: 1. have an MRI before undergoing the Cryosa Procedure 2. have an ultrasound before the Cryosa Procedure 3. permit the use of pressure-sensing catheters and ultrasound during their drug-induced sleep endoscopy, which is part of the ARCTIC-3 protocol 4. have an MRI after the Cryosa Procedure 5. have an ultrasound after the Cryosa Procedure.
The best perioperative strategy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in bariatric surgery remains unclear. A strategy is to monitor patients and administer preventive oxygen therapy during the first postoperative night. However it is unknown what if preventive oxygen therapy is necessary. The goal of this trial is to compare the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in participants with or without preventive oxygen therapy. Methods: Participants are patients who underwent bariatric surgery without treated OSA and will be will be randomized into arm A or arm B: Arm A: First postoperative night in the hospital with preventive oxygen therapy (standard care), Arm B: First postoperative night in hospital without preventive oxygen therapy (intervention).
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep-related respiratory dysfunction. The prevalence of OSA is increasing with the increasing rates of obesity and elderly population worldwide. Perioperative anesthesia management should be adjusted to improve patient safety in patients with OSA. In OSA patients, positive pressure ventilation support may be required in the preoperative period, various ventilation strategies may be required in the intraoperative period, different pharmacologic agents may need to be avoided, and intensive care unit follow-up or noninvasive ventilation support may be required in the postoperative period. However, it is reported that a significant percentage of OSA patients remain undiagnosed. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) has reported the criteria that should be questioned in order to determine the risk of patients in terms of OSA and to initiate the diagnostic process in risky patients and to make appropriate anesthesiologic arrangements in the perioperative period. In addition, the STOP-BANG assessment scale, which is widely used all over the world in OSA risk assessment, is also used in OSA risk assessment. It is thought that dental caries and extraction needs may be higher in OSA patients, especially since open-mouth sleeping accompanies the situation. In this respect, it is also important for patients to be diagnosed with OSA as it may prevent dental damage due to open-mouth sleeping in the future. Identifying patients at risk for OSA and directing them to the diagnostic process is very important for patient safety. Within the scope of the study, the criteria recommended by ASA and STOP-BANG score will be evaluated and recorded. Risk stratification in terms of STOP-BANG questionnaire and ASA criteria will be done separately for each patient and for each classification method. Patients at high risk will be consulted to the relevant medical department in the preoperative period for further investigation and treatment. In addition, it is aimed to correlate the risk levels determined in the study with postoperative respiratory complications and recovery time.
This study was conducted on 26 patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The patients were divided randomly and equally into two equal groups. In group I, the patients were treated with LLLT, while in group II, the patients were treated with dextrose injection. The patients were evaluated by: Medical history utilizing sleep unit medical sheet, physical examination including: anthropometric measures, epworth sleepiness scale, and Berlin questioner, and Polysomnography
The aim of this clinical trial is to apply a new objective titration procedure in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients treated with mandibular advancement device (MAD), and to compare this new objective titration procedure with the subjective titration procedure which is commonly used in clinical practice. The remotely intelligent sleep monitoring system (RISMS) will be used in the new objective titration procedure. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. The efficacy of MAD therapy after each titration procedure. 2. The titration time efficiency and the improvement of subjective symptoms after each titration procedure.