View clinical trials related to Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis.
Filter by:The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical equivalence of the test formulation of mometasone furoate anhydrous 50 mcg/actuation nasal spray (manufactured by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. and distributed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA) to the marketed formulation Nasonex® (mometasone furoate monohydrate) nasal spray, 50 mcg/actuation (Schering) in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. In addition, the efficacy of both the test and reference nasal sprays will be compared to a placebo nasal spray and safety will be compared.
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of ACT-129968 in adolescent, adult and elderly patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, due to mountain cedar pollen.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether specific subcutaneous immunotherapy affects fractions of regulatory T lymphocytes and histamine H2 receptor expression and ZAP70 in regulatory T lymphocytes.
This is a 2-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, efficacy and safety study of ciclesonide nasal aerosol administered once daily to male and premenarchal female subjects 6 to 11 years-old diagnosed with SAR.
This study will compare the nasal congestion symptom relief of phenylephrine extended release tablets and placebo in participants with allergic rhinitis.
The objective of the study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of 20 mg of Bilastine, compared to Desloratadine and placebo for the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis.
The Purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MP03-36 (0.15% azelastine hydrochloride)at dosages of 2 sprays per nostril once daily and 2 sprays per nostril twice daily in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Ectoin acts on membranes by forming an Ectoin-Hydro-Complex therewith providing a protection against external agents like aeroallergens. The effects of Ectoin containing nasal spray and eye drops have already been demonstrated in several studies with adult Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) patients and it was shown that they can effectively reduce symptoms of allergic rhinitis without resulting in any significant adverse events. The aim of this clinical investigation is to demonstrate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Ectoin Nasal Spray and Ectoin Eye Drops in pediatric and adolescent SAR patients. It is assumed that Ectoin containing products show an excellent safety profile and very good tolerability together with a potent efficacy in the treatment of SAR.
This study is a prospective observational cohort study with 3-month follow-up among a cohort of intranasal steroid (INS) -experienced patients newly starting fluticasone furorate nasal spray (FFNS). The primary aim is to examine the effect of FFNS on the use and associated cost of concomitant allergic rhinitis medications in INS-experienced patients starting treatment with FFNS who have a history of prior concomitant medication use. The secondary aim will be to determine the effect of FFNS on control of allergic rhinitis, as assessed by the Rhinitis Control Assessment Test (RCAT). Adult patients filling a new FFNS prescription will be recruited (within 4 days of starting their FFNS) across 50 branches of a retail pharmacy chain with co-located convenient care clinics. Approximately 350 patients who have active seasonal rhinitis and have used an INS other than FFNS and another prescription or over-the-counter allergy medication in the previous allergy season will be eligible for the study. A baseline questionnaire will be administered to collect information on patient demographics, a brief medical history of the patient's rhinitis, prior use of INS and other prescription and over-the-counter medications taken for allergic rhinitis, total out of pocket costs for the prior allergy season, number of office visits due to allergic rhinitis, and level of control of symptoms of allergic rhinitis. At 1, 2, and 3 months post-enrollment, a follow-up questionnaire will be administered to collect information on medications taken for allergic rhinitis, office visits due to rhinitis, and level of control of symptoms of allergic rhinitis. In addition, pharmacy claims data will be abstracted for patients 1 year prior to enrollment and 4 months after enrollment to verify and supplement patient reported data as needed. The primary outcomes will be rate of use of non-INS concomitant medications (frequency and duration) at baseline, and 1, 2, and 3 months follow-up and change in rate of use of non-INS concomitant medications (post vs. pre and from baseline to 3 months follow-up). Secondary outcomes will be change in total allergic rhinitis pharmacy expenditures (post vs. pre and from baseline to follow-up) and change in the level of control of allergic rhinitis, as measured by score on the Rhinitis Control Assessment Test (RCAT), from baseline to follow-up.
This study investigates the effects of Allergic Rhinitis (AR) on driving ability and memory functions. Our group has previously shown that patients suffering from AR symptoms perform less well on tasks requiring sustained attention compared to non symptomatic controls. Car driving is a typical behavior that is susceptible for changes in sustained attention and might therefore become worse under conditions when patients suffer from AR symptoms. We will compare the driving performance of untreated, symptomatic AR patients with the performance of symptomatic patients that have been treated with either a systemic AR medication (a pill) or a topical medication (nasal spray)