View clinical trials related to Sclerosis.
Filter by:This is a phase I, multicentre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the safety and tolerability of continuous i.c.v. administration of sNN0029 infusion solution at a dose of 4µg/day in patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).
The principal goal is to demonstrate that a specific pattern of microRNA (miRNA) expression can be correlated with the definite diagnostic of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). The investigators will use biological sample (from muscle biopsy, Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and blood sample) collected in three control populations: definite ALS patients according to El Escorial diagnostic criterion, control patients without any neurological disease having an orthopedic surgery for shoulder disease, and control patient explored for peripheral neuropathy and myopathy. A second goal will correlate the miRNA pattern to the severity and/or progression rate of the motor neurons define as the progression rate of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) score/year.
Biomarkers are essential for the identification of disease states. There are no early diagnostic or prognostic markers for ALS. The purpose of this study is to identify a panel of biomarkers from blood or spinal fluid of ALS patients and to collect data to better understand disease progression.
This is a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH, Acthar gel) administered as a pulsed regimen consisting of injections on three consecutive days per month in patients with progressive forms of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Patients will be randomly assigned to either an ACTH arm or a placebo arm. The main hypotheses are that 1) pulsed ACTH will be safe and well-tolerated, and 2) pulsed ACTH will slow progression of clinical and paraclinical measures of MS progression compared to placebo.
This is a Phase IV study to compare the current level of MS LifeLines ® (MSLL) services (face-to-face nursing visits and phone contacts) with customized MSLL services, to determine the optimal services to enhance medication adherence and treatment persistence with Rebif ® subcutaneous three times a week.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of AIN457 versus placebo in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.
Background: - Optic neuritis often is a symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). Many people who experience optic neuritis are later diagnosed with MS. MS disease activity seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans is often greater than that seen in tests given during regular doctor's visits. Even though MRI is a helpful tool for studying optic neuritis and MS, more information is needed on how MS symptoms show up on MRI scans. Researchers want to use MRI scans to track changes in the optic nerve after an optic neuritis episode. This approach will help them study the relationship between optic neuritis and MS. Objectives: - To collect more information about the relationship between optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Eligibility: - Individuals between 18 and 50 years of age who have new optic neuritis. - Individuals between 18 and 50 years of age who have new symptoms of MS other than optic neuritis. - Healthy volunteers between 18 and 50 years of age. Design: - Participants will be screened with a physical exam and medical history. They may provide blood or urine samples. - Participants with optic neuritis or other MS symptoms will have a baseline study visit. They will have a physical exam and full eye exam. To look for signs of MS, they will have evoked potential tests to see how the body responds to stimulation. They will also have an MRI scan to study any changes in the brain and optic nerves. - After the first visit, participants will have steroid treatment for 5 days for the optic neuritis. - Additional study visits will be given 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the baseline visit. The tests from the first visit, including the MRI scans, will be repeated at these visits. - Healthy volunteers will have a baseline study visit. They will have a physical exam and full eye exam. They will have evoked potential tests to see how the body responds to stimulation. They will also have an MRI scan to study any changes in the brain and optic nerves. - Healthy volunteers will have additional study visits 2 and 11 months after the baseline visit. The tests from the first visit, including the MRI scans, will be repeated at these visits.
- The investigators are conducting a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study comparing two MRI contrast agents in people with clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is a disease that affects the white matter and gray matter in the brain. MRI is used as a gold standard to visualize the degenerative changes in the brain and spine. The neurologist will usually order an MRI to confirm the diagnosis of MS using conventional imaging methods. These images reveal two main pieces of information regarding (a) the location of the lesions and (b) the status of the lesions. While the location of the lesions directly correlates with the clinical symptoms, the information about the status of the lesions informs the neurologist whether the lesion is new (active) or old (chronic). - This ability to differentiate new and old lesions requires the use of a contrast agent. Currently, used agents reveal some lesions but it is unclear if they reveal the full extent of the disease. In new lesions, there may be a leakiness in the blood vessels and if the contrast agent leaks out then the investigators can see this. In healthy controls, the blood brain barrier is usually intact and this leak does not happen. One open question is: "can the extravasation of the contrast agent to the brain precede the major tissue damage that we see in the structural MRI?" - Recently, a new FDA approved contrast agent (Gadavist) has been released and has enhanced characteristics in terms of affecting the MR signal resulting in a better contrast in the image and therefore, better diagnosis of the status of the disease. Given its high relaxivity, a small amount of Gadavist may show a better signal enhancement affected tissue for multiple sclerosis patients. The investigators hypothesize that Gadavist will reveal more tissue damage (lesions) than Magnevist and, therefore, may present a better tool for early diagnosis of brain damage. - The investigators' goal in this research project is to see if the newer contrast agent is able to detect changes and differentiate healthy from affected tissue in the white matter and gray matter earlier than current contrast agents so that detection can be possible before major damage occurs to the tissue. Each person will be scanned initially with one agent and then between 8 and 30 days later with the other agent. The MR data processing results will be compared to check the efficacy of each contrast agent.
This is a 3-part study where Parts A, B (single-blind - investigator and subject blind) will enrol healthy volunteers and Part C (open-label) will enrol RRMS patients. Parts A (single ascending dose) and B (repeat ascending dose) will assess safety, tolerability, PK and PD of GSK2618960. Part C (repeat doses) will assess safety, tolerability, PK, PD, immunogenicity, paraclinical (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] lesion counts) disease activity and markers of Th1 and Th17 mechanisms. Part A: Each of the 24 healthy volunteers (divided in 5 groups), will take part in only 2 of the planned 8 dosing sessions (A-active, P-placebo). Subjects in each group of Part A will be randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio to one of the following sequences: AA, AP or PA such that in each dosing session they will receive study treatment in a 3:1 ratio of active: placebo respectively. Part B: Dosing levels and regimen are dependent upon safety tolerability and PK/receptor occupancy (RO) data from Part A. In Cohort 1, 12 subjects will be randomized in a 3:1 ratio to A or P. Each subject will receive the same study treatment for repeated doses. If the duration of full RO from highest dose in Part A is less than 4 weeks, a second cohort of 12 subjects in Part B may be recruited, based on Dose Escalation Committee (DEC) decision Part C: The 20 RRMS patients will be assigned to active treatments for 2 to 4 repeated doses. Safety/tolerability and PK data monitoring and the decision to proceed to the next dose level of GSK2618960, and the decisions to proceed to Part B and Part C of the study will be made by a dose escalation committee.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of long-term treatment with BIIB019 (Daclizumab High Yield Process; DAC HYP) monotherapy in participants with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who completed Study 205MS301 (NCT01064401), Study 205MS203 (NCT01051349) or Study 205MS302 (NCT01462318). Secondary objectives of this study in this study population are as follows: To describe MS-related outcomes, including MS relapse, disability progression, MS lesion formation, and participant-reported impact of MS, following long-term treatment with DAC HYP To assess the long-term immunogenicity of DAC HYP administered by prefilled syringe (PFS) To assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of switching to DAC HYP in participants previously on long-term treatment with interferon β-1a (Avonex) in Study 205MS301(NCT01064401).