Sarcopenia — Evaluation of the SARC-F Score as a Screening Tool for Undernutrition in a Geriatric Population
Citation(s)
Beaudart C, Zaaria M, Pasleau F, Reginster JY, Bruyère O Health Outcomes of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0169548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169548. eCollection 2017. Review.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83.
Dellière S, Cynober L Is transthyretin a good marker of nutritional status? Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;36(2):364-370. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 20. Review.
Ethgen O, Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Bruyère O, Reginster JY The Future Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Europe: A Claim for Public Health Action. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017 Mar;100(3):229-234. doi: 10.1007/s00223-016-0220-9. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
Malmstrom TK, Miller DK, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Morley JE SARC-F: a symptom score to predict persons with sarcopenia at risk for poor functional outcomes. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016 Mar;7(1):28-36. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12048. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
Zamboni M, Mazzali G, Fantin F, Rossi A, Di Francesco V Sarcopenic obesity: a new category of obesity in the elderly. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Jun;18(5):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2007.10.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18. Review.
Evaluation of the SARC-F Score as a Screening Tool for Undernutrition in a Geriatric Population
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
