View clinical trials related to Rhinitis.
Filter by:The objectives of this study are to determine the safety and efficacy in seasonal allergic rhinitis of a four-week course of mometasone furoate compared to beclomethasone dipropionate or placebo.
This is an observational prospective multicenter clinical study, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment with Allergovac Poliplus subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with a mixture of 2 allergenic extracts (pollens or mites), in polymerized-depot formulation, administered in its different available allergenic extracts mixtures (2 pollens or 2 mites), and in one of the 2 recommended administration schedules (1 Day or Rapid).
Feasibility of treatment at multiple sites with the ClariFix cryoablation device for treatment of chronic rhinitis
It has been demonstrated that allergic rhinitis (AR) reduces sleep quality by some components such as nasal obstruction. Pollution and allergen exposure worsening AR, sleep quality is deteriorated. Sleep is associated to physical and mental health, alterations in sleep could explain the link between AR and work productivity diminution, impairment in daily activities or emotional problems. However, interactions between air pollution, sleep and allergic diseases are insufficiently understood. The main objective of this study is to determine the impact of pollution and pollens on sleep parameters.
The aim of this study is to assess if a physical barrier, created by the nasal gel Nascum®- Plus, is able to prevent or minimize the induction of nasal symptoms during allergen challenge in the Fraunhofer Allergen Challenge Chamber (ACC). Furthermore, the effect on soluble and cellular inflammatory markers induced by the allergic reaction will be assessed. Nascum®-Plus contains no active pharmaceutical ingredient, only monographed pharmaceutical excipients.
The aim of this first-in-human phase I study is to assess the safety and tolerability of HAL-MRE1 subcutaneous immunotherapy in subjects suffering from ragweed pollen-induced allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma. The study has 4 treatment groups: 1 placebo group and 3 groups treated with different doses of HAL-MRE1.
Intranasal corticosteroids are accepted as safe and effective first-line therapy for allergic rhinitis, especially in treatment of persistent symptoms. Budesonide, a non-halogenic glucocorticoid, is widely used in the management of inflammatory mucosal diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and allergic rhinitis. It is a highly fat-soluble substance with low water solubility and is presented as dispersion in marketed nasal sprays, like Rhinocort aqua 64. The maximum therapeutic efficacy of Rhinocort aqua is obtained after an application period of 7 to 14 days. In Budesolv, the solubility of budesonide is considerably increased suggesting that the same therapeutic efficacy can be reached with a lower dose. Better bioavailability of the dissolved drug promise an earlier onset of therapeutic efficacy. The current trial is undertaken to demonstrate these two effects. Subjects suffering from grass pollen allergic rhinitis will be challenged with grass pollen in a challenge chamber. Allergic subjects will be treated with two actuations (50 μl) of respective study treatment into each nostril once daily for 8 days. The total daily budesonide dose will be 40 μg per subject for Budesolv 10 and 256 μg per subject for Rhinocort® aqua 64. The primary objective of the study is to show non-inferiority of Budesolv 10 to Rhinocort® aqua 64. On day 8 grass pollen allergic patients will be challenged with grass pollen over a period of 6 hours and subjective nasal symptoms (congestion, sneezing, itching, rhinorrhea) as well as objective symptoms (nasal airflow, nasal secretion) will be assessed every 15 minutes. The second objective of the trial is to demonstrate an early on-set of therapeutic efficacy of Budesolv 10 compared to Rhinocort aqua. On day 1, grass pollen allergic patients will be challenged with grass pollen allergen in the challenge chamber over a period of 6 hours. After 1 hour 45 minutes, patients will receive their first dosage of the respective nasal spray treatment. During the 6 hour grass pollen challenge, subjective and objective endpoints will be measured every 15 minutes. To eliminate an individual bias based on expectations, the effect and onset of action is also compared to the effects of a suitable placebo. The same set of study participants will receive all three interventions in three consecutive treatment periods.
To investigate the short-term effects of red light rhinophototherapy on nasal patency in patients with a clinical diagnosis of allergic rhinitis using both active anterior rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry.
Non-interventional study to investigate the safety and tolerability of allergy immunotherapy ACARIZAX® 12 SQ-HDM in real-life clinical practice in adults patients (>18 years) with house dust mite allergy over a period of 12 months.
A multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, observational registry to asses the results of the ClariFix(TM) device when used to ablate unwanted tissue in the nose of subjects with chronic rhinitis.