View clinical trials related to Rhinitis, Allergic.
Filter by:This is a prospective, national, randomized, multicenter, parallel group, Phase III study that evaluates the effects of AI201901 in Allergic Rhinitis patients, where they will spray twice a day against azelastine into both nostrils during a 28-day follow-up period.
Objective biomarker of allergic rhinitis severity is necessary for monitoring disease severity and response to treatment in clinical setting and for research. We believe that psychological factors are the missing link between patient-perceived severity of allergic rhinitis and objective biomarkers. In our pilot study, several psychological factors were studied in relation to patient reported outcomes for severity of allergic rhinitis.
The primary objective is to assess the reduction of allergic symptoms as measured by combined symptom and medication score (CSMS) during birch pollen season after a single dose of REGN5713-5714-5715 versus placebo.
This study is a proof o concept aiming to determine the efficacy of Puressentiel nasal protective spray (PNPS) in patients with allergic rhinitis. Cross over study, with a nasal provocative test (NPT) in patients with allergic rhinitis sensitized to grass pollen. A day 0 (first NPT) the following outcomes are recorded: allergic Rhinitis control test (ARCT) and Inspiratory nasal peak flow (INPF) before and 30 min after the NPT. Nasal lavage is performed 30 min after the NPT and 3 cytokines (IL4, IL5 and IL13 are measured by ELISA. An other NPT is performed at day 30 and the same outcomes measured. 30 min before NPT 2 nasal sprays of PNPS are administered in each nostril in a randomized manner and cross over, the patient being is own control. The primary outcomes ins the IL4, IL5 and IL13 concentrations in the nasal lavage. ARCT and INPF are the secondary outcomes.
PQGrass309 is aimed at exploring the expected average treatment effect of PQ Grass 27600 SU cumulative dose on symptom and medication score in a field setting. The study will enrol adult subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR) induced by grass pollen exposure.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Magnólia nasal gel in the treatment of moderate-severe persistent or moderate-severe intermittent allergic rhinitis.
The purpose of this study is to analyze nasal samples for the presence of biomarkers of allergic inflammation as well as cold and flu infections, and compare these samples both in and out of an individual's active allergy season. 40 subjects who suffer from seasonal allergies will be recruited and seen both in and out of allergy season, and 10 healthy controls. Nasal epithelial lining fluid (NELF,) collected by placing small filter papers into the nostrils, blood for analysis and a cold/flu swab will be collected at each study visit.
Investigator examines the past prescription patterns and the reasons for the change of prescription to Monterizine capsules for Perennial Allergic Rhinitis patients with Asthma who will be taking Monterizine capsules to treat allergic rhinitis. After being given Monterizine capsules, Investigator evaluates the therapeutic effectiveness and safety for 3 months (or 6 months).
This study is to assess the onset of action of fixed drug combination of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate nasal spray (Dymista) in treating the nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by an allergen challenge in an Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU).
This was a multicenter, uncontrolled, open-label, special drug use study to investigate the safety and efficacy of Xolair by collecting data in its clinical setting in patients with severe to most severe seasonal allergic rhinitis aged ≥ 12 years and < 18 years whose symptoms were inadequately controlled despite to conventional therapies and used Xolair.