Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05201872 |
Other study ID # |
GIHSYSU-21 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 15, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
April 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2022 |
Source |
Sun Yat-sen University |
Contact |
Liang Huang |
Phone |
15989101216 |
Email |
huangl75[@]mail.sysu.edu.cn |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the differences of bacteriological in rectal
cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or transanal endoscopy radical resection. The
secondary purpose is to compare the effects of two different surgical methods on
postoperative complications.
Description:
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a new surgical procedure for total mesorectal
excision (TME) by dissociating the mesorectum from the bottom through transanal endoscopic.
The characteristics of TaTME are mainly summarized as transanal reverse operation, no
auxiliary abdominal incision, complete mesorectal excision and specimen removal through the
anus. So taTME is a natural orifice specimen extraction procedure (NOSES). Compared with
traditional laparoscopy, taTME has obvious oncological and technical advantages. However,
similar to NOSES, the specific surgical approach to taTME may induces bacteriological safety
concerns. Whether TaTME is safe and feasible still needs strong evidence-based medical
evidence. However, there have been prospective studies related to bacteriology in NOSES
surgery, but there is a lack of prospective clinical studies on the issue of bacteriological
diffusion during taTME surgery. Bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity is common in
laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Although the standard NOSES procedure avoids
bacteriological problems through the use of antibiotics, surgical peritoneal irrigation, and
the use of sterile specimen bags, its safety remains inconclusive. Therefore, compared with
conventional laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, taTME not only takes specimens from the
natural orifice, but also requires further prospective studies on whether the incision of the
intestinal wall from the mucosa during the operation will violate the aseptic principle, the
aseptic safety of taTME still needs further prospective studies to confirm. Therefore, the
investigators conducted a randomized controlled study to collect the abdominal and pelvic
irrigation fluids in the transanal and laparoscopic TME surgery for bacteriological
examination, to clarify the influence of the two different surgical methods on the
intraoperative bacterial diffusion. The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence of
two different surgical methods on the intraoperative bacterial spread, and to provide more
evidence-based medical evidence for the safety of taTME surgery.