View clinical trials related to Rectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:The preservation surgery of the anal sphincter has become a standard procedure for the treatment of rectal cancer and is now possible even when the tumor is close to the anus, thanks to the advancement of surgical techniques. This procedure allows patients to avoid a permanent artificial anus and enables them to evacuate through the anus, maintaining the continuity of the intestine, making it a highly preferred surgical option. Additionally, advancements in tumor treatments have led to improved long-term survival rates. However, this anal sphincter preservation surgery inevitably can cause functional abnormalities in the rectum, and around 90% of patients experience changes in bowel habits after surgery. The characteristic symptoms occurring after rectal cancer surgery, such as diarrhea, urgency of bowel movements, frequent bowel movements, and fecal incontinence, are referred to as Anterior Resection Syndrome (ARS). Particularly, symptoms following low anterior resection surgery for lower rectal cancer are termed Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS). These symptoms are most severe immediately after surgery, persisting up to 1-2 years, with some improvement over time. However, in many patients, LARS can remain a lifelong challenge, significantly impacting their quality of life. Currently, there is no definitive method to treat LARS, and symptom management is achieved through empirical treatment methods or medications. Many patients with LARS experience these symptoms predominantly at night, and it is presumed that their sleep quality is severely compromised, significantly affecting their overall quality of life. However, there is a lack of research on the prevalence of such patients and the appropriate treatments for them.
To evaluate the efficacy, safety and organ retention rate of short-course radiation combined with Adebrelimab and CAPEOX neoadjuvant therapy in patients with MSS/pMMR ultra low rectal adenocarcinoma.
This study aims to elucidate the effects of neoadjuvant Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced MSS rectal cancer.
One of the standard treatment options offered to patients of locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant (treatment given before surgery) radiotherapy & chemotherapy followed by surgery. In patients whose tumour has completely reduced after neoadjuvant treatment, the wait and watch strategy is also an option. This is another standard treatment option for patients of locally advanced rectal cancers. In this, the patient is monitored after treatment completion. In this study, investigators are only going to observe the patient's response to treatment, monitor their side-effects due to treatment and assess their quality of life using standardized quality of life questionnaires. No additional tests or hospital visits will be required as a part of this study. The patient will be followed up, as per standard follow-up protocol, for at least 2 years after the completion of their treatment.
Treatment of rectal cancer by standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy protocols leads to a complete response in about 15% of patients, or even a higher fraction if radiotherapy is followed by an Oxaliplatin based chemotherapy as published recently. If patient presents with a (near) complete response at the time of restaging after neoadjuvant treatment, an organ preservation strategy can be an alternative treatment to low anterior resection or abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. An organ preserving strategy is an ideal option for patients that are too frail for a major oncological resection. Furthermore, organ preservation is increasingly an option for a broader spectrum of patients as there is growing evidence that it allows to avoid surgical risks, including major dysfunction of the urinary, sexual and anorectal function at equivalent oncological outcomes. Studies investigating organ preserving rectal cancer treatment can broadly be divided into two categories. The first option is a planned local resection of the remaining scar at the site of the tumor after chemoradiotherapy. This can be achieved by direct transanal resection in very low tumors or by an endoscopic procedure as TEM (transanal endoscopic microsurgery) or TAMIS (trans-anal minimally invasive surgery). The advantage of this approach is the resulting pathological diagnosis which can confirm the complete response microscopically or indicate if there is remnant tumor tissue left and whether this is completely removed. However, local resection might have an additional negative functional impact and cumulate with function impairment from chemoradiotherapy. Alternatively, patients after complete clinical response can directly enter a surveillance programme without excision of the remaining scar after neoadjuvant treatment. This strategy provides less certainty about the complete regression of the primary tumor, but allows a treatment completely without surgical interventions and might lead to an even better functional outcome compared to patients undergoing local excision. There is good evidence that the influence of chemoradiotherapy on anorectal and genitourinary function is relevant. However there is lack of good quality data how much local excision adds to this impairment on the long run. In this study the investigator aims to compare functional outcomes and subjective treatment satisfaction in patients undergoing organ preserving treatment for rectal cancer with and without local resection after chemoradiotherapy. This data will help patients and healthcare personal to choose between these treatment options in the future, knowing the difference in functional outcome between the groups. As this is an observational study, there will not be any influence on treatment decisions for the included subjects. Clinical data will be collected by questionnaires and compared between the two cohorts, which is in line with a risk category A according to HRO (Human Research Ordinance).
Colorectal cancer has an annual incidence surpassing 700,000 cases globally, ranking as the fourth most prevalent cancer with the second-highest mortality rate. Rectal cancer accounts for approximately one-third of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer cases. Stages II (cT3-4/N0) and III (cT1-4/N1-3) rectal cancer are commonly classified as Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC), characterized by a high risk of local recurrence post-surgery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery (TME) has reduced the 5-year local recurrence rate in LARC from 25% to 5%-10%. Currently, neoadjuvant CRT+TME+postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy effectively controls local recurrence in LARC. However, it is associated with low Pathological Complete Regression (pCR) rates, suboptimal sphincter preservation, increased distant metastasis, heterogeneous adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy, and limited long-term survival benefits. Further optimization of neoadjuvant treatment strategies holds promise for promoting tumor regression and improving prognosis. In neoadjuvant therapy, the extent of rectal tumor regression is highly dependent on radiotherapy, with higher radiation doses correlating with increased rates of pathological regression. This study aims to investigate the role of MRI-guided radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost in enhancing tumor pCR in neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.
In this study, the bladder training include intermittent urethral catheter clamping combined with active urination training, which the investigators called ICCAUT strategy. This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial will recruit participants with rectal cancer. The participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the ICCAUT group or the free-drainage group. In the ICCAUT group, the participants will undergo intermittent clamping of the urinary catheter prior to its removal. Each time the catheter is released, the investigators will encourage the participants to actively initiate urination to facilitate complete bladder emptying. While participants in the free-drainage group will not receive any specific training. The urinary catheter will be removed on the second day after the surgery for both groups after the bladder is empty. The primary endpoint is the incidence of urinary dysfunction, which include secondary catheterization or incomplete bladder emptying. Secondary endpoints include urinary tract infection, time to first urination after catheter removal, catheter-related bladder discomfort syndrome, postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as urinary function within 30 days.
Preoperative radiotherapy combined with 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine is currently the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Although this strategy effectively reduces the risk of local recurrence, it fails to effectively improve the overall survival rate of patients . The root cause is that 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine based local radiotherapy is not effective in controlling potential micrometastases. Therefore, many studies try to combine preoperative radiotherapy with more intense chemotherapy and targeted drugs at the same time, as well as induction chemotherapy before preoperative radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy after, in order to obtain better efficacy. However, a number of studies have shown that increasing cytotoxic drugs fail to effectively improve pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and long-term survival rate, and significantly increase therapeutic toxicity . Therefore, the idea of trying to increase the efficacy of cytotoxic drugs by accumulating them does not work.Based on the use of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in colorectal cancer and other solid tumors, and referring to the scheme of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with radiotherapy in other solid tumors, we added envafolimab to local radiotherapy for advanced rectal cancer for exploration, with a view to further improving the pCR rate and long-term survival of patients.
The present study will investigate the safety of inferior mesenteric artery embolization prior to rectal surgery, according to IDEAL recommendations (Lancet 2009). It aims to assess the safety of endovascular embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery prior to surgery in patients with rectal tumors, and estimate the potential benefits in terms of time to surgery and the occurrence of post-operative fistulas.The study will also assess the impact of subacute ischemia induced by IMA embolization on colonic vasculature remodeling, colonic ischemic suffering, altered hemostasis and initiation of neo-angiogenesis through blood sampling kinetics.The hypothesis is that ischemic preconditioning by inferior mesenteric artery embolization prior to rectal cancer resection surgery is safe and will result in a decrease in acute relative colon ischemia and a reduction in the rate of fistulas and post-surgical complications. Indeed, we believe that the beneficial effects of the ischemic preconditioning of IMA will be due to better blood perfusion of the colon at 3 weeks, which is apparently linked to remodeling and/or the development of collateral vascularization.
This study aimed to assess efficacy of ArtiSential® in reducing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery duration. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent laparoscopic low or ultralow anterior resection for primary mid-to-low rectal cancer, performed by a single surgeon in 2012-2022. Patients were divided into groups, use group vs. non-use group, based on the use or non-use of the ArtiSential®. The total mesorectal excision quality and resection margin status did not differ between the groups. ArtiSential® reduced operative time without impairing surgical quality or oncologic outcomes.