Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Global domain of Cardiac Quality of Life Survey assessed 9 months after baseline as compared to baseline. |
The global domain of the Cardiac Quality of Life Survey assesses global health. Three questions related to 1) Perceived overall quality of life, 2) & 3) Satisfaction with overall health status and with heart health. The Perceived overall quality of life responses range from very poor =1 to very good =5. 2) & 3) Satisfaction responses range from very dissatisfied=1 to very satisfied=5. Total global domain score ranges from 3 to 15 points. The higher the score the less impact the cardiac disease has on quality of life. |
9 months after baseline visit |
|
Primary |
Physical domain of Cardiac Quality of Life Survey assessed 9 months after baseline as compared to baseline |
The physical domain of the Cardiac Quality of Life Survey assesses physical function. 13 questions. 1) Perception of overall physical health: responses ranging from 1=very poor to 5=very good. 2-6) Difficulty performing day-to-day physical tasks with responses ranging from 1=very easy to 5=very difficult. 7-13) Severity of heart disease symptoms affecting day-to-day physical activities: responses ranging from 1=never to 5=always. Total physical domain score ranges from 13 to 85. The higher the score the less impact the cardiac disease has on physical health. |
9 months after baseline visit |
|
Primary |
Emotional domain of Cardiac Quality of Life Survey assessed 3 months after baseline as compared to baseline. |
The emotional domain of the Cardiac Quality of Life Survey assesses emotional health. 23 questions. 1) Perception of overall emotional health: responses ranging from 1=very poor to 5=very good. 2) effect of heart disease-related physical limitations on emotional health: responses ranging from 1=always to 5=never. Eight questions asking about anxiety with responses ranging from 1=always to 5=never. Seven questions assessing depression are incorporated with responses ranging from 1=always to 5=never. 19-23) affects from a traumatic event related to their health: responses ranging from 1=always to 5=never. Total emotional domain score ranges from 23 to 115. The higher the score the less impact the cardiac disease has on emotional health. |
9 months after baseline visit |
|
Primary |
Social domain of Cardiac Quality of Life Survey assessed 9 months after baseline as compared to baseline. |
The social domain of the Cardiac Quality of life survey assesses social interaction and relationships. 10 questions. 1) Overall social interaction and relationships: responses ranging from 1=very poor to 5=very good. 2) Effect of heart disease-related physical limitations on social interaction: responses ranging from 1=always to 5=never. 3-10) Confidence in social interaction with friends and family: responses ranging from 1=always to 5=never. Total social domain score ranges from 10 to 50. The higher the score, the less impact the cardiac disease has on social health. |
9 months after baseline visit |
|
Primary |
Spiritual domain of quality of life assessed 9 months after baseline visit as compared to the baseline survey in the outpatient clinic. |
The spiritual domain of the Cardiac Quality of life survey assesses attitudes patients have surrounding their faith and health status. 4 questions. One question asks about if one's faith helps in coping with heart-related problems with responses ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Three questions ask about feelings of anger, injustice, and turmoil related to heart disease with responses ranging from 1=strongly agree to 5=strongly disagree. Total spiritual domain score ranges from 4 to 20. The higher the score, the less impact the cardiac disease has on spiritual health. |
9 months after baseline visit |
|
Primary |
Self-efficacy assessed 9 months after baseline visit as compared to the baseline survey in the outpatient clinic. |
The self-efficacy domain of the Cardiac Quality of Life survey measures self-efficacy as it relates to symptoms of heart disease. Six questions from the Cardiac Self-Efficacy Questionnaire asks about confidence in controlling symptoms, controlling illness, and maintaining daily functioning with responses ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Total self-efficacy score ranges from 6 to 30. The higher the score, the less impact the cardiac disease has on self-efficacy. |
9 months after baseline visit |
|
Primary |
Resilience assessed 9 months after baseline visit as compared to the baseline survey in the outpatient clinic. |
The resilience domain of the Cardiac Quality of Life survey measures the ability to recover quickly from difficulties. 9 questions asking about adapting to change, coping with stress, overcoming obstacles, and handling unpleasant feelings with responses ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Total resilience score ranges from 9 to 45. The higher the score, more resilient the participant is in facing problems related to cardiac disease. |
9 months after baseline visit |
|
Primary |
Impact of heritability of cardiac disease assessed 9 months after baseline visit as compared to the baseline survey in the outpatient clinic. |
Patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were asked questions about how the heritability of their cardiac disease affected their quality of life. 3 questions asking about how heritable cardiac disease affects the health and happiness of family members with responses ranging from 1=always to 5=never. Total score ranges from 3 to 15. The higher the score, the less impact the heritability of the cardiac disease as on the quality of life of the patient. |
9 months after baseline visit |
|
Primary |
Impact of radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD) assessed at baseline visit in the outpatient clinic. |
RIHD patients are asked about radiation therapy history, awareness of risk of RIHD, and impact on QOL. 7 questions. One question asks about time since last radiation therapy, ranging from 1= less than 5 years ago to 5=more than 30years ago. Another asks about time since RIHD diagnosis, ranging from 1=within the past week to 5=more than five years ago. One question asks about the duration of time between the symptoms of RIHD and diagnosis of RIHD with responses ranging from 1= less than 1 month to 5=more than 1 year. One question asks about the awareness of risk of RIHD before radiation therapy with responses ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. These four questions were not totaled. Three questions ask about the overall QOL before and after RIHD diagnosis and after treatment for RIHD. Responses ranged from 1=very poor to 5=very good. Total score for this section ranges from 3 to 15 with a higher score indicating RIHD had less of an impact on the overall QOL. |
Baseline visit |
|