Psychosis — Effectiveness of Cognitive Remediation in a Supported Education Setting
Citation(s)
Anthony WA Cognitive remediation and psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2008 Fall;32(2):87-8. doi: 10.2975/32.2.2008.87.88.
Bell M, Bryson G, Greig T, Corcoran C, Wexler BE Neurocognitive enhancement therapy with work therapy: effects on neuropsychological test performance. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;58(8):763-8.
BERG EA A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psychol. 1948 Jul;39:15-22.
Davidson, L (2003). Living Outside Mental Illness: Qualitative Studies of Recovery in Schizophrenia. New York City, NY: New York University Press.
Delis, D , Kramer, J., Kaplan. E., & Ober, B. (1987). California Verbal Learning and Memory Test (Manual). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Green MF, Kern RS, Heaton RK Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS. Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):41-51. Review.
Health Canada (2002). A Report on Mental Illnesses in Canada. Ottawa: Health Canada.
Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76.
Kelland DZ, Lewis RF The Digit Vigilance Test: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to diazepam. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;11(4):339-44.
Kurtz MM, Seltzer JC, Fujimoto M, Shagan DS, Wexler BE Predictors of change in life skills in schizophrenia after cognitive remediation. Schizophr Res. 2009 Feb;107(2-3):267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.10.014. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
McGrew JH, Johannesen JK, Griss ME, Born DL, Katuin CH Performance-based funding of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness: vocational rehabilitation and employment staff perspectives. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2007 Jan;34(1):1-16. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
McGurk SR, Mueser KT, DeRosa TJ, Wolfe R Work, recovery, and comorbidity in schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation. Schizophr Bull. 2009 Mar;35(2):319-35. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn182. Epub 2009 Mar 5. Review.
McGurk SR, Mueser KT Cognitive functioning, symptoms, and work in supported employment: a review and heuristic model. Schizophr Res. 2004 Oct 1;70(2-3):147-73. Review.
Reeder C, Smedley N, Butt K, Bogner D, Wykes T Cognitive predictors of social functioning improvements following cognitive remediation for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2006 Oct;32 Suppl 1:S123-31. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
Reichenberg A, Harvey PD Neuropsychological impairments in schizophrenia: Integration of performance-based and brain imaging findings. Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):833-58. Review. Erratum in: Psychol Bull. 2008 May;134(3):382.
Rose, D , & Wykes, T., Farrier, D., Doran, A., Sporle, T., & Bogner, D. (2008). What do clients think of cognitive remediation therapy?: A consumer led investigation of satisfaction and side effects. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 11, 181-204.
Rosenberg, M , (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
The Psychological Corporation (1997). WAIS-III administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Wilkinson ,G (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test 3 (Manual). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range Inc.
Wykes T, Huddy V Cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: it is even more complicated. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;22(2):161-7. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328322fbf4. Review.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
