View clinical trials related to Pancreatitis.
Filter by:A total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) can be performed for a number of benign indications, such as chronic pancreatitis. In the current standard of treatment, after non-invasive, endoscopic efforts and other surgical options to relieve the pain, a total pancreatectomy is a last resort option. The pancreas is surgically removed during this procedure. Afterwards, the patient will have diabetes mellitus that is usually difficult to control with dependency on exogenous insulin administration. In TPIAT, a total pancreatectomy is followed by islet isolation from the resected pancreas and autotransplantation of these islets into the liver by means of a transhepatic intraportal islet infusion. Depending on the number and quality of islets, TPIAT may lead to full islet function so that no anti-hyperglycemic therapy is necessary or to partial islet function necessitating anti-hyperglycemic therapy. This can be only oral agents with reasonable islet function or complex insulin regimes with poor islet function. However, even with partial Islet function, glycemic control is easier with a lower risk of hypoglycemic events and diabetes-related complications, and an overall improvement of quality of life. In this cohort, the endocrine function and glycemic variability will be monitored over time (up to 15 years). Additionally, pain scores, pain perception and central sensitization, quality of life, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and diabetes-related stress will be monitored.
Acute pancreatitis is a complex gastrointestinal disease with a variable course that is often difficult to predict early in its development. The majority of cases are mild, self-limited, and follow an uncomplicated course. However, 10-20% of cases can be associated with pancreatic or peripancreatic fluid collections, or both. Infected necrosis complicates 10% of all acute pancreatitis episodes and is associated with a mortality of 15-20%. Current guidelines for necrotizing pancreatitis recommend to postpone drainage until 4 or more weeks after initial presentation to allow collections to "walled-off". However, evidence of infection with clinical deterioration despite maximum support may mandate earlier intervention. It is unclear whether such delay is needed for drainage or whether earlier endoscopic intervention could actually be beneficial in the current approach. The aims of this randomized, controlled, multicenter study is to evaluate whether early endoscopic drainage in patients with peripancreatic fluid collection is superior to postponed intervention in the current practice.
Prospective, multi-national, multi-centre observational diagnostic study of novel microRNA and protein biomarkers in peripheral blood and/or urine to detect and predict the severity of drug-associated acute pancreatitis (AP), with comparison of the same biomarkers in patients with acute pancreatitis from other causes, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers.
This study aims to determine the optimal timing of endoscopic intervention after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) of chronic pancreatitis with pancreatic stones.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) comes with a risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), which accounts for considerable morbidity, high healthcare expenditure, and death. The pathophysiology of PEP and the underpinnings of the preventive effect of rectal NSAID (RN) is poorly understood. Guidelines advise to take preventive measures with a single dose of 100mg RN, peri-ERCP. While NSAID administration reduces the risk with 40%, PEP still occurs after ERCP. In addition, patients with a PEP history have a higher risk to develop recurrence after a subsequent ERCP. This might suggest that an underlying genetic risk may contribute to increasing the incidence of PEP in some patients.
This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. . Patients will be divided into conservative or endoscopic group and fecal pancreatic elastase-1 (FE-1) is tested to evaluate pancreatic exocrine function. The effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endoscopic treatment on the progression of chronic pancreatitis in painless patients will be determined.
This research is being done to see if using oral tacrolimus before endoscopy, can prevent pancreatitis that may occur after ERCP (a type of gastrointestinal endoscopy).
The purpose of this study is to prospectively determine the effects of administering proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) following pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative outcomes. The findings of this study will help in avoiding the widespread use of PPIs during the immediate postoperative period following pancreatic surgery.
Aggressive intravenous hydration has been shown in randomized trials to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), though studied regimens are often impractical. To date, no studies have prospectively assessed short-term (60-90 minute) aggressive hydration regimens that are feasible for outpatients undergoing ERCP and subsequent discharge. Furthermore, little is known with regard to fluid type, volume, and timing with respect to ERCP. In this study, we will aim to assess whether the amount of peri-procedural intravenous fluid administered around the time of ERCP is associated with the risk of PEP (the primary outcome).
The study aims to investigate pathophysiological changes in coagulation in relation to inflammation in patients with acute pancreatitis. Serum and plasma is sampled repeated days from admission. Analysis will be done after recruitment. Specific biomarkers accuracy for prediction of moderate and severer acute pancreatitis will be calculated.