Clinical Trials Logo

Pain clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Pain.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01466101 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Analgesic Effect of Pregabalin in Patients Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

Start date: January 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pregabalin will decrease the total amount of opioid required in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. In addition, pregabalin will decrease the incidence of opioid-related side effects in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.

NCT ID: NCT01461252 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Safety and Efficacy of Cryoablation Combined With Radiation Therapy for the Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases

Start date: April 2013
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation therapy combined with radiation therapy for the relief of pain associated with metastatic bone tumors.

NCT ID: NCT01431742 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Longterm Safety Study of BEMA Buprenorphine in Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain

Start date: July 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This is an open label study of up to approximately 52 weeks duration to assess the safety and effectiveness of BEMA Buprenorphine in the management of moderate to severe chronic low back pain. BEMA Buprenorphine is an oral transmucosal form of the opioid analgesic, buprenorphine hydrochloride, intended for application to the buccal mucosa. Buprenorphine is a synthetic opioid that is classified as a partial μ-receptor agonist and a Schedule III controlled substance in the United States.

NCT ID: NCT01426971 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Ibuprofen Versus Ibuprofen Plus Caffeine in the Treatment of Migraine.

Start date: December 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Primary Objective: - To compare the treatment groups in the reduction of pain score by at least 30 mm on a visual pain scale (VAS) at 60 minutes after study medication intake, compared to the baseline score (obtained before the study medication intake). Secondary Objectives: - To assess the proportion of patients with more than 50% pain relief, according to the VAS score at 45 minutes after study medication intake compared to baseline - Determine the following aspects in the timing of study medication intake: - Time to the first perception of pain relief - Time to onset of meaningful pain relief - Reduction of pain at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120 and 240 minutes after study medication intake, to be evaluated as the difference between the scores on VAS in each period and baseline - To assess the pain according to the five items of Headache Relief Rating - HRR (0: strong worsening 1: slight worsening 2: no change 3: slight improvement 4: strong improvement) at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after study medication intake, according to the diaries completed by the patients - To check the proportion of the patients requiring the third tablet of study medication within 24 hours of starting the study treatment and when it occurred - To check the timing and frequency of rescue medication intake, as well as the proportion of patients who used these medications within 24 hours of starting the treatment - Safety assessment.

NCT ID: NCT01412840 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Sterile Water Injections for Relieving Ureterolithiasis Pain

Start date: January 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Ureterolithiasis pain is a severe condition for which it takes some 30 minutes for standard treatment to yield maximal pain relief, a period during which the patient suffers severe to intolerable pain. It would thus be valuable to further evaluate sterile water injection as a method for achieving rapid relief for this type of pain.

NCT ID: NCT01350622 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Efficacy of PENNSAID® for Pain Management in the Emergency Department

Start date: December 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this study is to compare the pain relieving effect and speed of onset of PENNSAID to that of standard oral diclofenac under double blind conditions using a growth curve approach to pain measurement. The investigators will test the hypothesis that PENNSAID will provide more rapid pain relief than oral diclofenac during the ED visit. The secondary goal of the proposed work is to discover and model the onset and course of pain relief during the emergency department (ED) visit.

NCT ID: NCT01293994 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

A Study of Genetic Variation Influencing Pain and Response to Opioid Medications

Start date: February 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The investigators will be collecting saliva DNA samples from chronic back pain patients. The investigators hope to find candidate genes associated with response to opioid medication by correlating molecular genetics data with pain measurement and opioid responsiveness data including opioid hyperalgesia and opioid analgesic tolerance.

NCT ID: NCT01289340 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Wound Healing and Pain Management in Partial Thickness Burns

Start date: October 2015
Phase:
Study type: Observational

the aim of the study is to compare between two advanced wound dressing and conventional dressing for the primary ER treatment of superficial partial thickness burns

NCT ID: NCT01169025 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Fentanyl vs. Low-Dose Ketamine for the Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Aeromedical Patients

Start date: September 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Often, patients transported by aeromedical systems do not receive enough medication to control and relieve their pain. The purpose of this study is to determine if pain treatment with intravenous (IV) ketamine is a better way to treat aeromedical patients' pain than the current treatment practices.

NCT ID: NCT01166529 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in the Management of Pain in Abdominal Non-pancreatic Malignancies

Start date: August 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has been performed for nearly 100 years to alleviate the abdominal pain associated with pancreatic malignancy and other conditions, and is usually undertaken at a late stage in the disease process, when analgesic options have been largely exhausted or have led to significant and often unacceptable side effects. Until recently, CPN was most commonly performed under radiographic guidance; however, in the last 10 years, CPN has been routinely performed under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. Several case series have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this technique when used to treat the pain associated with pancreatic malignancy and/or chronic pancreatitis. However, the efficacy of EUS-guided CPN in the treatment of pain related to non-pancreatic malignancies has yet to be described. The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of EUS-guided CPN in the management of pain in patients with abdominal non-pancreatic malignancies. Our hypothesis is that EUS-guided CPN will provide adequate pain relief in these patients.