Outcome
| Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
| Other |
To study and characterize different cell populations to evaluate the potential effect of physical exercise on immunosurveillance. |
Difference in cell populations at the end the intervention compared to levels prior to the start of the physical exercise and nutrition program |
12 weeks |
|
| Other |
To study and characterize different proteins to evaluate the potential effect of physical exercise on immunosurveillance. |
Difference in proteins at the end the intervention compared to levels prior to the start of the physical exercise and nutrition program |
12 weeks |
|
| Primary |
To evaluate the feasibility (adherence) of a supervised physical exercise program in ovarian cancer patients on PARPi treatment. |
Adherence to the program will be evaluated considering the total program completed/total program. Adherence per patient will be considered adequate if 70% of the planned program is exceeded. The percentage of patients who have been adherent to the program will be evaluated. Feasibility will be evaluated according to the percentage of adherent patients. The intervention will be considered feasible if the percentage of adherent patients is greater than or equal to 2/3 (66.6%) of the patients who give their consent to participate in the program and attend at least the first session. |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To evaluate the safety of a supervised physical exercise program in ovarian cancer patients on PARPi treatment. |
Frequency of AEs occurring during the study, globally and program related will be described. Adverse events will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To assess fatigue levels at the end of intervention compared to levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire)). |
Difference in fatigue levels at the end of intervention compared to levels prior to the start of the physical exercise and nutrition program (FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire). Score range: 0-52. Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To assess quality of life at the end of intervention compared to levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). |
Difference in quality of life at the end of intervention compared to levels prior to the start of the physical exercise and nutrition program (EORTC QLQ-C30). Score range: 0-100. A high score for the global health status represents a high quality of life. |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To assess quality of life at the end of intervention compared to levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire ovarian 28 (EORTC QLQ-OV28). |
Difference in quality of life at the end of intervention compared to levels prior to the start of the physical exercise and nutrition program (EORTC QLQ-OV28). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To assess quality of life at the end of intervention compared to levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program (PRO-CTCAE questionnaires). |
Difference in quality of life at the end of intervention compared to levels prior to the start of the physical exercise and nutrition program (PRO-CTCAE questionnaires). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare biological data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: baseline physical exercise level |
Difference in biological data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: physical exercise level (6 minute-walk test) |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare fitness data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: baseline physical exercise level |
Difference in fitness data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: physical exercise level (6 minute-walk test) |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare biological data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: baseline physical exercise level |
Difference in biological data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: physical exercise level International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ questionnaire). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare fitness data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: baseline physical exercise level |
Difference in fitness data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: physical exercise level International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ questionnaire). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare biological data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: baseline body composition |
Difference in biological data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: physical exercise level (body composition). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare fitness data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: baseline body composition |
Difference in fitness data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: physical exercise level (body composition). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare biological data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: baseline anthropometric values |
Difference in biological data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: physical exercise level (anthropometric values). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare fitness data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: baseline anthropometric values |
Difference in fitness data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: physical exercise level (anthropometric values). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare biological data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: baseline upper body strength/lower body strengt |
Difference in biological data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: physical exercise level (upper body strength (handgrip)/lower body strength (30 second sit to stand). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare fitness data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: baseline upper body strength/lower body strengt |
Difference in fitness data at the end of intervention compared to baseline data: physical exercise level (upper body strength (handgrip)/lower body strength (30 second sit to stand). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare psychological parameters at the end of intervention compared to baseline parameters:insomnia (ISI). |
Difference in psychological parameters at the end of intervention compared to baseline parameters: Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare psychological parameters at the end of intervention compared to baseline parameters: depression and anxiety (HADS). |
Difference in psychological parameters at the end of intervention compared to baseline parameters: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). |
12 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
To compare fatigue levels at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program |
Difference in fatigue levels at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program. |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
To compare quality of life at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program |
Difference in quality of life at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program. |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
To compare biological data at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program |
Difference in biological data at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program. |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
To compare physical exercise level at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program |
Difference in physical exercise level at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program. |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
To compare body composition at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program |
Difference in body composition at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program. |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
To compare anthropometric values at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program |
Difference in anthropometric values at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program. |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
To compare upper body strength (handgrip)/lower body strength parameters at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program. |
Difference in upper body strength /lower body strength at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program. |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
To compare psychological parameters at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program |
Difference in psychological parameters at 3 months follow-up after the intervention vs levels prior to the start of the physical exercise program. |
6 months |
|