Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04818710
Other study ID # diathermy skin incision
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 1, 2019
Est. completion date January 31, 2021

Study information

Verified date March 2021
Source National Research Centre, Egypt
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study was performed to compare both methods of skin incisions to determine differences in postoperative pain, hemodynamic changes, incisional time, blood loss during incision, wound healing, and wound complication.


Description:

Our study aims to compare the use of diathermy versus scalpel in making skin incision during cesarean section to judge the variations in 1. incision time, 2. incision blood loss, 3. hemodynamic changes, 4. postoperative pain, 5. wound healing 6. wound complications.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 476
Est. completion date January 31, 2021
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - women with a history of only one previous cesarean section - age between 18 and 40 years - gestational age of 38 to 41 weeks - body mass index less than 30. Exclusion Criteria: - any medical disorder that can affect wound healing as diabetes, chronic anemia, chronic skin conditions, history of allergy, or history of an infected surgical wound. - Women who conducted primary or emergency cesarean deliveries - cardiac patients on pacemakers - patients on anticoagulants - women refusing to participate in the study

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
skin incision with a scalpel
A Pfannenstiel skin incision was done through the subcutaneous tissue, rectus sheath and dissected from rectus muscle until peritoneum was visualized. group 1 (skin incision with a scalpel)
skin incision with diathermy
A Pfannenstiel skin incision was done through the subcutaneous tissue, rectus sheath and dissected from rectus muscle until peritoneum was visualized. group 2 (skin incision with diathermy)

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt National Research Centre Cairo

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
National Research Centre, Egypt Kasr El Aini Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary incision time We compared incisional time by using a digital clock. The incisional time was established as follows: when skin incision was made, the surgeon called out "start the clock". Once the rectus sheath was visualized, the surgeon calls out "stop the clock". The incision time was the difference between "start" and "stop". during surgical operation. the difference between starting skin incision till the rectus sheath was visualized
Primary incision blood loss This was calculated by weighing the swabs pre and postoperatively (1mg = 1ml) after complete hemostasis was achieved. during surgery
Primary postoperative pain We compared those patients clinically for postoperative pain for 24 hours by visual analog scale (VAS) score, a psychometric response scale, and it is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. It is 11 points numeric scale ranges from "0" representing one pain extreme (e.g., no pain) to "10" representing the other pain extreme (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). This score was recorded for each participant at 2,4,6,8,10,12,24 hours postoperatively. during the first day after surgery
Secondary wound healing healing by primary versus secondary intention during the first week after surgery
Secondary wound complications like seroma, hematoma, ecchymosis, dehiscence (separation of the subcutaneous tissues with skin), and infection during the first week after surgery