Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

A rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a severe injury of the knee. The current gold Standard treatment for young and active patients with instability, is a surgical ACL reconstruction. However, there still is no consensus on which graft is best suited for this.The aim of the current multi-center randomized controlled trial was to investigate the hypothesis that an anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a (flat) quadriceps tendon autograft is at least as effective as reconstruction of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament with a patella tendon autograft or a hamstringtendon autograft, in terms of failure, measured 2 years postoperatively. Failure is defined gedefinieerd as pathologicai laxity, complaints of knee instability in the absence of any pathological laxity and/or discontinuïty ofthe graft on MRl or arthroscopy.


Clinical Trial Description

A rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a severe injury of the knee. The current gold Standard treatment for young and active patients with instability, is a surgical ACL reconstruction. However, there still is no consensus on which graft is best suited for this.

Paradigms on the different types of auto grafts and their weaknesses and benefits originate mostly from the eighties and nineties, when the patella tendon was being replaced by the hamstring graft as the 'new' gold standerd. Nowadays, the philosophy of isometrie tunnel placement has been abandoned, and has been replaced by the philosophy of anatomie reconstructions. The question then arises: Are the results of the comparative studies, and the current paradigms, still applicable, now that the philosophy has transitioned from isometric to anatomic tunnel placement? Irrespective of the disadvantages compared to the patellatendon autograft, such as a higher re-rupture and revision percentage when used in patients under 25 years old, the hamstring autograft is currently the most used graft for ACL reconstruction worldwide. The question then arises: is it justified that the hamstringgraft is the most used graft worldwide? Rehabilitation protocols are often not, or poorly, described, despite it's significant effect on the outcome and co morbidity of an ACL reconstruction. Especially anterior knee pain, which is often mentioned as a disadvantage of the patellagraft, is significantly influenced by rehabilitation protocols. The introduction and implementation of a nation-wide evidence-based rehabilitation protocol in The Netherlands created uniformity of rehabilitation treatment, and the possibility to generalize scientific conclusions. The question then arises: Due to new insights in rehabilitation and implementation of new protocols, is the anterior knee pain, the often mentioned disadvantage ofthe patelia tendon graft, stiil a relevant disadvantage? The quadriceps tendon autograft is a less often used graft. Nevertheless, research has shown that it seems like a good alternative for the patella tendon and hamstring autograft. Functional outcome is similar, while less donorsite morbidity is reported compared to the patellatendon and hamstring autograft. The question then arises: Is it fair that the quadriceps tendon is rarely used as an autograft for ACL reconstruction? Increasing knowledge of the anatomy of the ACL results in new insights in the methods to achieve true anatomie ACL reconstruction. New arguments support the use of the patella tendon - and even the quadriceps tendon - over the use of the hamstringgraft, because their anatomic similarities to the anterior cruciate ligament might be better suited to restore knee kinematics. The question then arises: are the flat-shaped patella tendon autograft and quadriceps tendon autograft better suited to restore the anatomy of the ruptured ACL than the round hamstring graft? Hypothesis Tlie hypothesis is that anatomic reconstruction ofthe ruptured anterior cruciate ligament with a (flat) quadriceps tendon autograft is at least as effective as reconstruction of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament with a patella tendon autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft, in terms of failure, measured 2 years postoperatively. Failure is defined as pathological laxity, complaints of knee instability in the absence of any pathological laxity and/or discontinuïty of the graft on MRl or arthroscopy.

Objective of the study:

Primary objective:

To investigate the hypothesis that an anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a (flat) quadriceps tendon autograft is at least as effective as reconstruction of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament with a patella tendon autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft, in terms of failure, measured 2 years postoperatively. Failure is defined gedefinieerd as pathologicai laxity, complaints of knee instability in the absence of any pathological laxity and/or discontinuïty of the graft on MRl or arthroscopy.

Secondary objectives:

patiënt reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinimetrics, radiological assessment, duration of rehabilitation necessary for return to sports and daily activities and the level of sport activities to which the patiënt returned, in patients treated with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patellatendon autograft, hamstringtendon autograft of quadricepstendon autograft, as measured in the short-term (6 weeks, 6,9,12 months postoperatively), mid-term (2 years postoperatively) and long-term (5 and 10 years postoperatively).

Study design:

Multicenter blocked stratified randomised controlled trial with varying block sizes (n=3, 6, 9, 12). Patients with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture, confirmed by an orthopaedie surgeon (as evident from anamnesis, physical examination and radiographic imaging) who meet the inclusion criteria and do not have any of the exclusion criteria, will be asked to partieipate in this study.

Baseline measurements will be performed, after informed consent is obtained. Allocation of treatment of the included patients will be performed in the operating room (OR), where patients will be randomised (blocked and stratified) per clinic, to have ACL reconstruction with a patella tendon autograft, hamstring tendon autograft or quadriceps tendon autograft. Stratification will be based on age (18-25 and >25), level of sport activities (Tegner Activity Level Scale 5-7 and 8-10) and surgeon.

Follow-up identical to the follow-up of standard care, with standard checkups after 6 weeks, 6, 9, months and 1 and 2 years. Two extra follow-up moments (after 5 and 10 years) will be planned. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

NCT number NCT03073083
Study type Interventional
Source Orthopedisch Centrum Oost Nederland
Contact R.A.G Hoogeslag, MD
Phone 0031887085375
Email wetenschap@ocon.nl
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date March 6, 2017
Completion date December 2029

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04062578 - Effects Provided by a Physiotherapy Treatment Preventing Lower Extremity Injuries in Female Football Players N/A
Recruiting NCT05461326 - Quadriceps Tendon Versus Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Autograft ACL Reconstruction RCT N/A
Completed NCT05109871 - Reliability and Validity of Inline Dynamometry Study for Measuring Knee Extensor Torque N/A
Recruiting NCT05504018 - Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of ACL Reconstruction Results N/A
Recruiting NCT06185231 - Investigation of the Effects of Vibration Therapy on Pain, Functionality, and Proprioception After ACL Injury N/A
Recruiting NCT03968913 - Biologic Therapy to Prevent Osteoarthritis After ACL Injury Early Phase 1
Completed NCT04408690 - Feasibility of a RCT That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair After ACL Injury Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06222814 - Evaluation of the Results of Two Different Methods in Management of Antero-lateral Instability of the Knee N/A
Recruiting NCT05614297 - Agreement Between Rolimeter and Lachmeter in Patients With ACL Injury
Active, not recruiting NCT05184023 - The Effect of PEMF for Patients With Quadriceps Muscle Weakness After ACLR N/A
Completed NCT04906538 - Objective Results of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Internal Suture Augmentation Technique Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05014009 - The Influence of Neuromuscular Training on Whole-body Movement Strategies and Knee Mechanics During Change-of-direction Tasks in Sports Science Students N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06083818 - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Protocol in Female Football Players With Dynamic Knee Valgus N/A
Recruiting NCT05584020 - Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury N/A
Completed NCT04580290 - Jewel ACL Post Market Clinical Follow Up Study
Recruiting NCT04888052 - Prolonged Preoperative Rehabilitation in ACL Rupture. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05580133 - All-Inside Single-Bundle for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Full Thickness of the Peroneus Longus Tendon Compared to the Six-strand-hamstring Autograft (ACL)
Recruiting NCT04162613 - Can Sensorimotor Function Predict Graft Rupture After ACL Reconstruction
Not yet recruiting NCT05619393 - Comparison of Kinematic Movements Between ACL Deficiency With ACL Reconstruction and Healthy People N/A
Recruiting NCT06201442 - Post-Traumatic Knee Osteoarthritis Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction