Premature Rupture of Fetal Membranes Clinical Trial
— NIPROMOfficial title:
Does Nipple Stimulation Shorten Time to Vaginal Birth in Women With Term PROM? (NIPROM Study)
Verified date | January 2017 |
Source | Hillel Yaffe Medical Center |
Contact | Ofer Limonad, M.D |
oferlimonad[@]gmail.com | |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM) is defined as the rupture of membranes before the
onset of regular uterine contractions.
PROM occurs in approximately 10% of all pregnancies (ranging from 2.7% to 17%), with 60% to
80% of cases occurring at term. Approximately 90% of patients' experience PROM enter
spontaneous labor within 24 hours, but disagreement exists among health care providers on
the optimal management of women with PROM, particularly the need for and timing of
inductions.
Nipple stimulation is a non-medical natural method for induction of labor. Previous studies
demonstrated its effectiveness for initiating labor within 72 hours in women with favorable
cervices. The actual mechanism by which such a technique results in cervical ripening is not
well understood.
In this study, we aim to assess the effectiveness of nipple stimulation in gravid women with
term PROM choosing expectant management.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 80 |
Est. completion date | January 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Primagravidas at term (>37) weeks having PROM - Singleton pregnancies - Cephalic presentation - Unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <7) - Desire an expectant management Exclusion Criteria: - Prior cesarean section/ uterine rupture / transmural uterine incision - Non reassuring fetal heart rate monitoring (Category III) - Signs of fetal or maternal infection - Time elapsed since PROM > 6 hours - Meconium or blood-stained amniotic fluid - Any contraindication for vaginal birth |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Israel | Hillel Yaffe Medical Center | Hadera |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center |
Israel,
Cahill AG, Tuuli MG. Labor in 2013: the new frontier. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;209(6):531-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.016. Review. — View Citation
Christensson K, Nilsson BA, Stock S, Matthiesen AS, Uvnäs-Moberg K. Effect of nipple stimulation on uterine activity and on plasma levels of oxytocin in full term, healthy, pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68(3):205-10. — View Citation
Elliott JP, Flaherty JF. The use of breast stimulation to prevent postdate pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jul 15;149(6):628-32. — View Citation
Elliott JP, Flaherty JF. The use of breast stimulation to ripen the cervix in term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Mar 1;145(5):553-6. — View Citation
Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Myhr TL, Wang EE, Weston JA, Willan AR. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996 Apr 18;334(16):100 — View Citation
Hill WC, Moenning RK, Katz M, Kitzmiller JL. Characteristics of uterine activity during the breast stimulation stress test. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Oct;64(4):489-92. — View Citation
Johnson JW, Daikoku NH, Niebyl JR, Johnson TR Jr, Khouzami VA, Witter FR. Premature rupture of the membranes and prolonged latency. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 May;57(5):547-56. — View Citation
Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003392. Review. — View Citation
Leake RD, Buster JE, Fisher DA. The oxytocin secretory response to breast stimulation in women during the menstrual cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Feb 15;148(4):457-60. — View Citation
Mishanina E, Rogozinska E, Thatthi T, Uddin-Khan R, Khan KS, Meads C. Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):665-73. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130925. Review. — View Citation
Salmon YM, Kee WH, Tan SL, Jen SW. Cervical ripening by breast stimulation. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jan;67(1):21-4. — View Citation
Viegas OA, Arulkumaran S, Gibb DM, Ratnam SS. Nipple stimulation in late pregnancy causing uterine hyperstimulation and profound fetal bradycardia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Apr;91(4):364-6. — View Citation
* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment | One year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02801227 -
Oxytocin vs. Prostaglandin for Induction of Labor in Primiparas With Prelabor Rupture of Membrane and Low Bishop
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00940043 -
Monitoring of the Inflammatory Response of Patients With Premature Rupture of Membranes With Bedside Tests
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01736852 -
Evaluation of CRB in PROM Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05568745 -
Balloon + Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol to Induce Labor in Case of PROM (RUBAPRO2)
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03108404 -
Predictive Score for Neonatal Mortality for Women With Premature Rupture of Membranes Between 22 and 28 Weeks of Gestation
|
N/A |