the Management of Weight Regain After Gastric Bypass by Endoscopic Suturing Clinical Trial
Official title:
Medico-economic Evaluation of the Management of Weight Regain After Gastric Bypass by Gastrointestinal Narrowing of Jejunal Anastomosis by Endoscopic Suturing: Apollo Endosurgery OverStitch Technical
NCT number | NCT02048033 |
Other study ID # | 5037 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Terminated |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | January 3, 2014 |
Est. completion date | April 11, 2017 |
Verified date | August 2021 |
Source | University Hospital, Montpellier |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Prospective multicenters randomized study to compare the efficiency and the socioeconomic impact of the endoscopic management (Overstitch technique) of weight regain after gastric bypass surgery to non invasive treatment
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 74 |
Est. completion date | April 11, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age > 18 years - Surgical criteria: patient with bariatric surgery by gastric bypass since, at least, 24 months - Clinics criteria of weight regain or treatment failure: - Patient with weight regain> 5kg / m² - Patient with EWL (excess weight loss) <25% after 2 years of treatment. - Loss of early satiety (interrogation) - Patient with a compatible psychological and cognitive status with the study, - Patient agreeing to follow the procedures of the study and can participate at the follow-up study during 2 years - Subject with no rights from the national health insurance programme - Consent form signed Exclusion criteria: - Pregnancy (plasma assay of beta-HCG positive) - Presence of cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, endocrine, renal, gastrointestinal or tumor comorbidities making irrelevant patient participation in the judgment of the investigator - Patient participating in another clinical study or participated in another study within the last 30 days or for which the annual compensation received exceeds € 4,500 - Patient with a contre-indication to the achievement of surgery (fistula, ulceration, ...) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Louis Mourier Hospital | Colombes | |
France | Lille Hospital | Lille | |
France | Montpellier Hospital | Montpellier | |
France | Nice Hospital | Nice | |
France | HEGP Hospital | Paris | |
France | Strasbourg Hospital | Strasbourg | |
France | Villeurbanne clinic | Villeurbanne |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Hospital, Montpellier |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Weight loss assessment of Apollo Endosurgery OverStitch technical | The main objective is to compare the efficacy of endoscopic surgery Apollo Endosurgery OverStitch technical than the conventional non-interventional strategy in patients with weight regain after gastric bypass.Moreover, all of these patients will also benefit from the medical-nutritional usual care. | At 12 and 24 months after surgery | |
Secondary | Comparison of both strategies on tolerance (adverse events and serious adverse events) | The secondary objectives of this study were to compare in real life these both strategies of the management of weight regain after gastric bypass on tolerance and safety related to obesity. | At 12 months after Baseline and at each visit | |
Secondary | Comparison of both strategies on comorbidities | The secondary objectives of this study were to compare in real life these both strategies of the management of weight regain after gastric bypass on comorbidities related to obesity (type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, sleep apnea syndrome, ...). | At 12 months after Baseline and at each visit | |
Secondary | Comparison of both strategies on quality of life | The secondary objectives of this study were to compare in real life these both strategies of the management of weight regain after gastric bypass on quality of life. | At 12 months after Baseline and at each visit | |
Secondary | Comparison of both strategies on medico-economic impact (drugs fees, medical consultation fees..) | The secondary objectives of this study were to compare in real life these both strategies of the management of weight regain after gastric bypass on medico-economic impact of innovation.
Moreover, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed at the end of this study. |
At 12 months after Baseline and at each visit |