Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Spinal anesthesia is commonly used in patients undergoing total hip replacements. The purpose of this study is to compare lidocaine to bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in patients having a total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective of this study is to compare the two spinal anesthesia treatments in regards to transient neurological symptoms (TNS).


Clinical Trial Description

Most surgeons would agree total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful surgical interventions. However, when it comes to the type of anesthesia to improve THA outcomes, surgeons do not agree. General anesthesia has been shown to be associated with increases in adverse events, increased operating room times and increased length of stay. Therefore, more surgeons are turning to spinal anesthesia for better pain control, decreased need for narcotics resulting in less nausea, sooner recovery of bowel function, and faster participation in physical therapy. All of these factors can lead to a sooner discharge from the hospital, which would lead to significant cost savings. Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) are a concern of using spinal anesthesia and have been shown to occur up to 16-40% of the time with lidocaine. Symptoms of TNS have been described as pain, dysesthesia, or both that occur in the legs or buttocks and urinary retention after recovery from spinal anesthesia. Intensity of pain varies but can be quite severe. Symptoms can appear in a few hours, for up to 24 hours after surgery. Lidocaine is the most widely used anesthetic due to its rapid onset, intense nerve blockade, and short duration of action. The risk of developing TNS after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine has been shown to be higher when compared to other anesthetics. However, it is unknown whether there are differences between patients who undergo spinal anesthesia with lidocaine versus bupivacaine in THA. This knowledge is important because it has been shown that bupivacaine spinal anesthesia is more effective than lidocaine with minimal adverse effects. A large randomized, prospective study is needed to prove the difference between the two types of anesthesia. The primary objective of this study is to compare TNS among people who receive one of two spinal anesthesia treatments, lidocaine or bupivacaine. The study will be conducted on individuals who are indicated for THA and have agreed to have spinal anesthesia during their surgery. All patients will be randomized by a computer program and will receive either lidocaine or bupivacaine spinal anesthesia prior to their THA. In addition to TNS, other outcomes include urinary retention, hypotension, ambulation and length of hospital stay. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT02818894
Study type Interventional
Source Emory University
Contact
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 4
Start date September 27, 2016
Completion date March 5, 2020

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02242201 - Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Lumbar Plexus Verses Periarticular Phase 4
Completed NCT02414542 - Minima Clinical Study
Completed NCT01817010 - Strength and Function Following Total Hip Arthroplasty N/A
Completed NCT01443975 - Clinical Evaluation on the Use of the X-pander Device N/A
Recruiting NCT05530174 - Effect of Single vs Multiple Prophylactic Antibiotic Doses on PJI Following Primary THA in Patients With a Fracture N/A
Recruiting NCT05530551 - Effect of Single vs Multiple Prophylactic Antibiotic Doses on PJI Following Primary THA in Patients With OA N/A
Recruiting NCT05054192 - Reliability and Validity of Modified Four Square Step Test
Recruiting NCT06141928 - Comparison of Three Different Surgical Approaches on the Functional Outcome After Total Hip Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT04492462 - The Impact of Two Different Physical Therapy Programs in the Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Anterior Approach Hip Replacement Surgery N/A
Withdrawn NCT02926651 - Single Versus Multi-Dose Oral Tranexamic Acid in Patients at High Risk for Blood Transfusion After Total Joint Arthroplasty Phase 4
Completed NCT02308813 - Predictability of the Ability to Perform an Emergency Stop With Disorders of the Hip N/A
Recruiting NCT02032017 - Percutaneous Assisted Approach for Total Hip Replacement and it's Effect on Functional Rehabilitation. N/A
Recruiting NCT01312077 - The Analgesic Efficacy of Periarticular Infiltration of Local Anaesthetic for Total Hip Replacement Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT01380665 - Prevena™ Incision Management System Over Primarily Closed Hip and Knee Incisions in Patients Immediately Post Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05893563 - Corail Stability at 5-Years Post-Total Hip Arthroplasty
Recruiting NCT06088069 - Effect of Virtual Reality on Perioperative Anxiety, Stress and Pain in Total Hip Arthroplasty N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03210844 - The Clinical Outcomes After Direct Anterior Approach and Microposterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT04801680 - Mpact 3D Metal Cup PMS
Terminated NCT02006251 - Real-Time Instrument for Acetabular Shell Positioning
Completed NCT01525667 - Safety and Efficacy of IM Injections of PLX-PAD for the Regeneration of Injured Gluteal Musculature After Total Hip Arthroplasty Phase 1/Phase 2