View clinical trials related to Orthopedic Disorder.
Filter by:Why? There is not much information in the UK on how well patients who sustain major trauma function afterwards. Major trauma is defined as significant injuries with a calculated 'injury severity score' (ISS) over 15. The ISS is calculated based on how many parts of the body are injured and how badly injured these are, up to a maximum score of 75 (fatal). We feel that learning more about how these people cope afterwards, and what influences this will allow us to improve the care we can deliver in the future, which will hopefully lead to better outcomes. What? We propose to implement the FIT (Functional outcomes In Trauma) study to assess how well patients function physically, psychologically and socially, and get back to activities of daily living, work and participation in recreational activities following major trauma. Who? Major trauma patients: 2 cohorts: prospectively going forwards in time (from baseline to 12 months after trauma) and retrospectively going backwards in time (patients between 2-10 years after trauma). Where? Leeds General Infirmary. How? We will do this by collecting data from questionnaires completed by patients (also known as PROMS, or Patient Reported Outcome Measures), using an online questionnaire service developed at the University of Leeds, called QTool. These will offer the participants the chance to tell us how they are doing across lots of areas, with both tick-box multiple choice questions and open-ended questions to explain how they are doing and what influences this. We will also interview a random selection of patients in further detail to discuss how their trauma has affected them, how they found the study, how we could improve it. Afterwards we will send participants a copy of what we have learnt from the study and aim to publish it in a scientific journal. Timeline/Phase overview: The FIT Study will consist of 2 phases. Phase 1 will last for 2 years in total (12 months for prospective study cohort recruitment and 12 months follow-up for these patients) during which time data will be collected from the retrospective cohort as well. Following this there will be a full analysis of the data, after which phase 2 of the FIT Study will begin. Patients enrolled into phase 1 of the study will be given the option of consenting to being contacted annually to complete the same set of online PROMs, which will comprise phase 2 of the study. We will also continue active recruitment into both prospective and retrospective arms of the study in phase 2. We plan to continue data collection on an annual basis up to 10 years post trauma in phase 2 of the study for patients in both cohorts. We hope to incorporate elements of the FIT Study into future routine care with what we learn from the FIT Study, and develop our own unique Patient Reported Outcome Measure tool, with the overall aim of improving patient care and outcomes.
This study responds to the need to validate the feasibility and effectiveness of a telerehabilitation home monitoring program for users receiving a preliminary assessment while waiting for rehabilitation services at the outpatient physiotherapy clinic. The specific objectives are as followed: 1) Evaluate the implementation of telerehabilitation monitoring (TELE-FOLLOW-UP); 2) Evaluate the effectiveness of TELE-FOLLOW-UP compared to the usual phone call; 3) Evaluate user satisfaction for these two modes of service delivery; 4) Identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of TELE-FOLLOW-UP. In order to meet the objectives of the study, mixed methods will be used. A randomized clinical trial will be used to achieve objectives 1, 2 and 3. The investigators plan to recruit 142 patients. Two groups will be formed: 1) TELE-FOLLOW-UP group: users who will receive follow-up by telerehabilitation; 2) PHONE-FOLLOW-UP group: those who will receive follow-up by a phone call.
Patient commonly present with orthopedic injuries in the emergency department. Musculoskeletal education has not historically been emphasized in American medical schools, and the effectiveness of an orthopedic surgery rotation has not been well studied in emergency medicine (EM) training. Competency in musculoskeletal education has been tested previously with a validated instrument, the basic competency exam (BCE), to assess baseline knowledge in primary care and emergency physicians. Residents from 2 different EM residency training programs will be given the BCE to determine baseline musculoskeletal knowledge prior to their orthopedic surgery rotations. A post-test BCE will be given to the residents from both EM training programs upon completion of their orthopedic surgery rotation and compared.
To determine the safety and efficacy of Amniotic and Umbilical Cord Tissue for the treatment of the following condition categories: Orthopedic, Neurologic, Urologic, Autoimmune, Renal, Cardiac and Pulmonary Conditions. The hypotheses are that the treatments are not only extremely safe, but also statistically beneficial for all conditions. Outcomes will be determined by numerous valid outcome instruments that compile general quality of life information along with condition-specific information as well.
This study will look into the incidence of Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) after the intrathecal use of lidocaine in comparison to intrathecal Bupivacaine.
This study evaluates whether ketamine, given as part of an anesthetic, improves depression symptoms in depressed patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Half of participants will receive a ketamine infusion during surgery, while the other half will receive a placebo (normal saline) during surgery.
The immediate goal of the proposed research is to test the value of a new low-cost, low-dose standing CT system for efficient early detection of both joint degeneration and elevated contact stress. The standing CT scanner holds promise for detecting arthritic changes earlier than other imaging modalities because of the combination of its 3D nature and ability to image joints in a weight-bearing pose. A secondary goal of the proposed research is to enable predictive models for osteoarthritis risk based on measures of post treatment contact stress, both to inform treatment and so that new interventions can be tested in a manner incorporating risk stratification.
The investigators aim to compare the use of a suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block vs lumbar plexus block as an adjunct to general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing orthopedic procedures involving the hip or upper femur. This study will help determine the efficacy of the two techniques and their advantages when compared to each other including time to perform the block, opioid consumption reduction, effects on postoperative pain, and the length of stay.
The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in older adults waiting for hip and knee replacements. The study will be a randomised controlled trial design, including 2:1 randomisation into an intervention and usual care group respectively. A target of n=45 patients ≥60 years will be recruited from Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, UK, approximately 8-10 weeks before surgery, assisted by research nurses. The variable-length intervention, informed by Self-Determination Theory (SDT), will be composed of multiple behaviour change techniques, namely motivational interviewing, individualised feedback on sedentariness, goal-setting, environmental modification, self-monitoring, and social support. Assessments will occur at baseline, 1 week pre-surgery, and 6 weeks post-surgery. The primary outcome will be the feasibility of the trial, assessed quantitatively using study statistics, and with mixed-methods assessment of acceptability, practicality, adaption, satisfaction, and safety via questionnaires given to participants. Exploratory outcomes will include physical function, cardiometabolic biomarkers, measurement of SDT constructs, and both objective and subjective measurement daily activity and sedentariness. The study will last up to 18 weeks per participant.
The purpose of this study is to determine if goal elicitation among orthopaedic patients improves their perceived involvement in care.