View clinical trials related to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Filter by:Nivolumab is superior to docetaxel monotherapy as second line treatment in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the long term survival advantage seems to be limited to a 20% proportion of treated patients. To date, no definitive biomarker, including tumor cells or infiltrative cells PD-L1 expression, has been demonstrated to predict nivolumab (or other PD1 or PD-L1 inhibitors) efficacy. Ipilimumab has also suggested efficacy in the same patient population. Finally, the addition of ipilimumab to nivolumab has a suggested better efficacy over nivolumab alone in advanced stage NSCLC patients with an acceptable safety profile. In parallel, hypo-fractionated radiotherapy alone has been suggested to elicit the immune system activity as demonstrated by the occurrence of an abscopal effect. Some case reports in melanoma but also lung cancer patients reinforced this hypothesis. Furthermore, preclinical and clinical data suggest that radiation may have a synergistic effect with antibodies targeting the immune checkpoints (PD1, PD-L1, CTLA4) and improve antitumor efficacy. Moreover, it has been shown that fractionated radiotherapy delivered in combination with aPD-1 or aPD-L1 mAbs is able to generate efficacious CD8þ T-cell responses that will in turn improve local tumor control, long-term survival, and protection against tumor rechallenge. Therefore, the combination of single fraction or hypo-fractionated radiotherapy with the anti PD1 nivolumab and/or the anti CTLA4 ipilimumab warrants further investigation. However, a large number of doses, sequences and schedules remain possible. In order to select the best combination, a mathematical modeling of immunotherapy in cancer and its synergy with radiotherapy has been set up. This work provides with mathematical formulas to link the drug serum concentrations of nivolumab and ipilimumab, and the dose of radiation therapy, to the immune response. In silico, the single and three fractions schedule have been found to have the same efficacy while activation of the immune response seems to be better using a hypo-fractionated (less than 6 fractions) radiotherapy in vivo.
This Phase II study consists of 2 parts: 1) pre-screening phase and 2) treatment phase. The pre-screening phase will investigate the presence of HRAS mutations in subjects with a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of squamous non-small cell lung cancer (SQ-NSCLC). Subjects may participate in the pre-screening phase at initial diagnosis or following prior lines of therapy for SQ-NSCLC. The treatment phase will investigate the antitumor activity in terms of ORR of tipifarnib in subjects with locally advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (SQ-NSCLC) with HRAS mutations and for whom there is no curative therapy available.
This is a Phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of avelumab in combination with axitinib in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least one prior platinum containing therapy, and in treatment naïve patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer, who are ineligible for cisplatin containing chemotherapy for their advanced disease.
The primary purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of canakinumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in adult subjects with stages II -IIIA according to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the subset of IIIB (T>5cm N2 disease) completely resected (R0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
A research study to evaluate the activity of alectinib for the Treatment of pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC that have confirmed RETrearrangement.
This is a single center, single arm phase 2 study to establish the safety and efficacy of itacitinib (also known as INCB039110) administered in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic PD-L1 positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
To compare the efficacy of pegilodecakin in combination with nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in participants with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer as measured by objective response rate.
To compare the efficacy of pegilodecakin in combination with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab alone in participants with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer as measured by objective response rate.
Primary Objectives: - To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in combination with REGN2810 in participants with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were naïve to anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-containing therapy, or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1-containing therapy, and to confirm the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). - To assess the response rate of isatuximab in combination with REGN2810 in participants with either mCRPC who were anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy naive, or NSCLC who progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, or of isatuximab as single agent in participants with mCRPC. Secondary Objectives: - To evaluate the safety of the combination of isatuximab with REGN2810 or isatuximab monotherapy. - To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab and REGN2810. - To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab single agent or in combination with REGN2810, and to characterize the PK of REGN2810 in combination with isatuximab. - To assess overall efficacy of isatuximab in combination with REGN2810 or as a single agent.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of the study drug LY3381916 administered alone or in combination with anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint antibody (LY3300054).