View clinical trials related to Neuromuscular Blockade.
Filter by:To assess the impact of an e-learning course in neuromuscular monitoring on the frequency of application of objective neuromuscular monitoring for assessment of depth of neuromuscular blockade in general anaesthesia and secondarily on the incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade after anesthesia. We will collect data prospectively from 6 Danish anaesthesia departments from the time of intervention, using data from the Anaesthesia Information Management System (AIMS). Baseline data is obtained from another study based on the same data extraction procedure (NCT02914119).
Aim: To explore - the frequency of use of objective neuromuscular monitoring for assessment of depth of neuromuscular blockade in general anaesthesia - the incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade, and - the timing of reversal of the neuromuscular blockade at the end of anaesthesia. We will collect data from 7 Danish anaesthesia departments, using data from the Anaesthesia Information Management System (AIMS).
There is an urgent need for an easy-to-use and accurate quantitative neuromuscular monitor in the clinical setting. The aim of this clinical investigation is to examine a prototype of a quantitative monitoring instrument that will meet most, if not all, of the clinical requirements.
A new NMT module from Mindray (Mindray Co. Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.) claims to measure 3 directional accelerography. The aim of the study is to compare the neuromuscular block of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg (twice the 95% effective dose, ED95) monitored by the NMT versus that monitored by the Relaxometer Mechanomyograph on the other hand in Group 1, and versus the TOF-Watch on the other hand in Group 2 to clinically evaluate the new system for its diagnostic accuracy.
Substantial respiratory morbidity has been associated with postoperative residual paralysis, which is fairly common after general anesthesia involving a neuromuscular blocking agent. Common practice in United States is to reverse neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine at the end of surgery. A new drug with evidence of more complete neuromuscular reversal has been developed, sugammadex. The objective of this study is to determine if a strategy of rocuronium neuromuscular reversal with sugammadex will reduce the proportion of subjects with any postoperative pulmonary complication, compared to neostigmine.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Sugammadex in rapidly reversing deep neuromuscular blockaded (induced by rocuronium)
The investigators aim to investigate operating conditions, postoperative recovery and overall satisfaction of surgeons between deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) group and restricted NMB group during spinal surgery under general anesthesia. The investigators hypothesize that this study can present good surgical conditions, postoperative recovery outcomes and overall satisfaction of surgeons in deep NMB group, thereby proving the advantages of deep NMB as well as flaws of restricted NMB in spine surgeries.
Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is a well-known procedure to maintain a safe and rapid airway in patients especially at risk of aspiration. Propofol and rocuronium are generally used agents for RSI. However, the difficult airway scenarios are always valid for these patients, even without predictive signs of difficult airway. Therefore, it is important to decrease the rocuronium dose used in RSI to achieve a rapid recovery of a neuromuscular conduction with the aid of a reversal agent in case of difficult airway. The short acting opioids such as remifentanil may be helpful to reduce the dose of rocuronium in RSI.
The investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized trial to assess the impact of neuromuscular blockade on early (<72 hours post-ICU admission) postoperative respiratory complications in cardiac surgical patients. The study will compare continual neuromuscular blockade with cisatracurium to a single dose of succinylcholine during general anesthesia for cardiac surgery.
This study is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, and parallel design study. A total 96 patients were randomized to receive a deep block or a moderate block scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Investigators estimated the proportion of intra-abdominal pressure(IAP) alarm and surgical rating score.