View clinical trials related to Nerve Block.
Filter by:Hypothesis: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant of lidocaine can decrease the median effective concentration(EC50) of lidocaine for obturator nerve block during transurethral resection of bladder tumor
The aim of this study is to compare the combined ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block and distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blocks, with supraclavicular block alone. Sixty two patients undergoing upper extremity surgery will be randomized to supraclavicular only (Group S, n=31) or supraclavicular + distal (Group SD, n=31) group. Patients in group S will receive 32 mL of lidocaine 1.5% + epinephrine 5µg/mL and in group SD receive 20 mL of lidocaine 1.5% + epinephrine 5µg/mL followed by a distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blocks using 50:50 mixture of lidocaine 2% + levobupivacaine 0.5% (4 mL/nerve). Sensory and motor block of the ulnar, median, radial and musculocutaneous nerves will be assessed every 5 minutes starting at the 10th minutes. The imaging, needling and performance times will be recorded. Also the onset and anesthesia related times, need for analgesic and first analgesic time will be noted.
This research project intends to look at the effect that a certain type of freezing injection, called a paravertebral block, has on the pain after an operation for breast cancer, the amount of pain relief that is needed and the side effects from this pain relief. The hypothesis is that the paravertebral block, in combination with a general anesthetic will reduce both pain scores and the amount of strong pain killers (opioids) that is needed. This will reduce the side effects of the pain killers such as nausea and vomiting. This will be assessed by comparing it a general anesthetic with pain killers given through the intravenous (IV) as is routine practice. Patients requiring breast cancer surgery, who agree to be involved in the trial, will be randomly allocated into two groups: both groups will receive a block, then a standardised and optimised general anesthetic. In one group however the block is simply a small injection under the skin (a sham block), whereas the other group will receive a proper paravertebral block prior to this. Both groups will receive opioids as necessary, depending on both their bodies reaction during the surgery and their pain scores when they wake up. The paravertebral block is a very safe procedure with a very low side effect profile, and many studies have shown a benefit in breast cancer surgery. The investigators would like to assess this in our own practice. The block is normally inserted under some light sedation, with freezing into the skin initially. It is normally very well tolerated. The sham block will also be performed under light sedation and freezing into the skin. The patients will not be able to tell whether they are having the sham block or the paravertebral block, because both are very well tolerated. There are no potential complications from the sham block.
The use of ultrasonography as an adjunct to regional anesthesia has significantly increased in recent years. Brachial plexus blockade by an axillary approach is amenable to the use of ultrasound guidance. Real time sonography of nerve structures ensures an optimal distribution of the block solution. When compared to other methods of nerve localization, sonography decreases: failure rate procedure time and the onset time for blockade. Furthermore, the use of ultrasound for peripheral nerve blockade demonstrates decreased procedure related complications such as nerve injury and unintentional vascular puncture. Traditional axillary block techniques relying on surface anatomical landmarks require large volumes of local anesthetic, generally 40mL and greater. Utilizing the increased accuracy offered by ultrasound, some studies have shown that low volumes of local anesthetic can yield successful axillary plexus blockade. Therefore, the tradition of using large volumes of local anesthetic for axillary blocks, even without ultrasound, may not be warranted. Although recent investigations support using a low volume of local anesthetic for brachial plexus blockade, there is a lack of outcome data from blinded randomised trials. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate 2 different volumes of local anesthetic for axillary blockade: 1) 20mL or 2) 30 mL. For the 2 different volumes used in this study, a 1.5% solution of mepivacaine was chosen due to its widespread clinical use in axillary blocks, which is secondary to: rapid onset of action, intermediate duration of effect, and relative low cost. The primary outcome was block success rate for outpatients undergoing distal upper limb surgery. Secondary objectives included comparing the 2 volumes with respect to: time required to perform the block, and onset of sensory and motor blockade.
The optimal infusion technique (continuous rate vs. intermittent bolus) for peripheral nerve blocks has not been established. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the efficacy of an automated intermittent bolus technique to a continuous rate of infusion of local anesthetic in femoral nerve catheters. We hypothesized that the intermittent bolus technique would provide enhanced analgesia compared to a continuous infusion rate as assessed by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) hydromorphone consumption and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores.
This is a research study to determine if the way local anesthetic- or numbing medication- is delivered through a tiny tube next to the nerves that go to the thigh affects the strength and sensation in the thigh.
The purpose of this study is to compare the success rate of two approaches for obturator nerve block in TURB (conventional pubic approach [Labat technique] and inguinal approach.
The real-time visualization of a needle and nerve during an ultrasound-guided nerve block can be challenging. These difficulties may partly explain the systemic complications of local anesthetics under ultrasound. Injection of small amounts of a solution around the anesthetized nerve (hydro-dissection) has been proposed to enhance contrast outlining its borders and also to improve the visualization of the needle tip. The glucose solution 5% solution is interesting because it allows, unlike saline, to maintain the motor response with neurostimulation. The hydro-dissection can be particularly useful when one suspect hypoechoic vessels near the nerve to be anesthetized. Thereby, the nerve well demarcated and separated from the vessels, injection of local anesthetic is performed in the circumferential diffusion space (like a small pocket) without redirecting needle. The influence of this hydro-dissection on the nerve block efficiency is unknown. The nerve block quality can be improved because the entire anesthetic is injected in contact with the nerve, but it can also be reduced due to the dilution of the local anesthetic by the glucose solution. In this randomized study, the investigators test the hypothesis that hydro-dissection does not alter the nerve block onset time.
Background and aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proved beneficial for presenting anatomy for regional anaesthesia and to demonstrate spread of local anaesthetic. A new axillary plexus block with a triple injection (1), combining a short axillary catheter method with a transarterial axillary block, is now being evaluated with a 3 Tesla MRI. In this study, the investigators are investigating MR visualisation of three different block techniques and compare the clinical efficacy of the techniques, with the MR findings. Patients & Methods: After obtaining approval of the protocol from the regional ethical committee, 3 x 15 adult patients, scheduled for hand surgery, were included in a randomised, blinded prospective study.
This study aims to detect differences in onset time of brachial plexus (i.e., arm) anesthesia using two different nerve block techniques. Using ultrasound guidance, axillary (i.e., at the armpit) and infraclavicular (i.e., below the collarbone) blocks will be performed to patients undergoing upper limb surgery. The investigators will analyze how long it takes for anesthesia to be adequate for pain-free surgery, thus determine the optimal technique for this kind of surgery.