View clinical trials related to Nausea.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine if aromatherapy (essential oil) is effective at reducing up-set stomach and vomiting after surgery and in reducing the need for up-set stomach medications
Poor control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting has a major clinical and psychological impact in patients treated with chemotherapy. Metabolic, nutritional and mechanical complications, as well as psychological repercussions, complicate the therapeutic management of the patient and can lead to poor compliance, a deterioration in the general condition or even prolongation of hospitalizations and a delay in the implementation of chemotherapy cures. The control of induced chemo- and radio-induced nausea and vomiting rests above all on their prevention. At present and in most centers, the prevention of nausea and vomiting in the pediatric onco-hematology department of the CHU de Nice is based exclusively on drug treatments, according to a protocol established according to the emetogenic risk of the chemotherapy received. We propose a study evaluating the effectiveness of the stimulation of acupuncture points by low frequency laser therapy associated with antiemetics in the management of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in patients of 2 to 20 years followed in the service of analgesics. pediatric onco-hematology.
The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of three different regimens of prophylactic ondansetron on the incidence and severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting.
Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most distressing toxicities of cancer treatment. It can occur up to 90% in case of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) use. It is important to effectively manage CINV for a number of reasons. Acute phase vomiting can lead to vomiting in the delayed phase. It causes poor compliance with further therapy. Quality of life is compromised. It is easier to prevent nausea/vomiting than to treat it. Though strategies for prevention of CINV have been improved, it is still a significant problem. Newer drugs were explored and studied. The complete response rates were further increased with usage of olanzapine, an FDA approved antipsychotic, which blocks multiple neurotransmitters in the central nervous system. Olanzapine has been studied in multiple randomized trials in adults for its safety and efficacy in prevention of CINV. Various RCTs have demonstrated the superiority of olanzapine for prevention of CINV in patients receiving highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Olanzapine has been approved for prevention of CINV in adults. Unfortunately there are no large randomized trials demonstrating the efficacy of olanzapine for CINV prevention in children receiving HEC. The positive experience with olanzapine reported in adult oncology patients has prompted some pediatric clinicians to prescribe olanzapine for individual children receiving chemotherapy. Olanzapine is frequently used for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in children and adolescents. Though various studies have demonstrated safety of olanzapine in children, data regarding the efficacy of olanzapine in children and adolescents for prevention of CINV is limited. There are many small studies describing the safety and efficacy of olanzapine for prevention of CINV. However, there are no large randomized trials. Olanzapine is available in generic form and is not an expensive drug. Therefore we would like to conduct a randomized trial to look for the efficacy of olanzapine in pediatric population for prevention of CINV
This study is Phase 2 pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) dose-finding study of oral netupitant administered concomitantly with oral palonosetron in pediatric cancer patients for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with emetogenic chemotherapy. Two different netupitant dosages will be tested in patients aged from 3 months to < 18 years: 1.33 mg/kg up to a maximum of 100 mg, and 4 mg/kg up to a maximum of 300 mg. All netupitant doses in all age classes will be concomitantly administered with palonosetron 20 μg/kg (up to a maximum dose of 1.5 mg) which is the IV palonosetron dose approved by USA FDA for the pediatric population. The primary objective is to investigate the PK/PD relationship between netupitant exposure (AUC, Cmax) and antiemetic efficacy (CR in delayed phase) after a single oral netupitant administration, concomitantly with oral palonosetron in pediatric cancer patients receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy (MEC) or Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy (HEC) cycles. Efficacy parameter to be used in the correlation is the proportion of patients with Complete Response (CR i.e., no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) during (> 24-120 h after the start of chemotherapy on Day 1). The secondary objectives are to assess the safety and tolerability after single oral administration of netupitant given concomitantly with a single oral administration of palonosetron; to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (AUC, Cmax, tmax and t1/2) of oral palonosetron at the fixed dose of 20 μg/kg in pediatric patients with the concomitant administration of netupitant. A total of 92 pediatric cancer patients receiving either HEC or MEC will be enrolled in the study.
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled trail, the objective of this study is observation the effect of sub hypnotic dose of propofol for prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by hemabate during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. The primary outcome is the presence of post-delivery intra-operative nausea and vomiting in parturients. The patients demographic characteristics, blood pressure, sensory block level, and the medications will be collected.
Investigators will observe the incidence of post-cesarean nausea or vomiting and try to associate it with some risk factors.
The purpose of the project is to estimate the effect size of a technology based intervention for older adults with cancer for nausea and vomiting. Participants will be randomized to either an intervention or a wait control group. Outcomes such as symptom severity, quality of life and resource use will be examined.
This study is designed to examine the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting during 24 hours after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving preoperative intravenous fluid loading (group F), ondansetron (group O) and receiving neither fluid nor ondansetron or control group (group C).
The investigators tested the hypothesis that administration of intravenous dextrose as a maintenance fluid in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery would reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared with normal saline solution in the same dose. A prospective randomized double blinded controlled study was conducted. Eighty six participants were randomized to dextrose solution (n= 42) or normal saline solution (n= 44). The Bellville postoperative nausea and vomiting scores were recorded until 24 hours after surgery.