View clinical trials related to Mental Health Disorders.
Filter by:This 3-year Hybrid Type 1 study will randomize 208 people with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders (COD) referred from the Worcester Hub. This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of MISSION, a multi-component team approach, versus linkage with a Peer Specialist on improving outcomes among individuals with CODs. We expect that individuals receiving MISSION versus linkage only will show greater improvement in treatment engagement, substance use, and mental health outcomes. This study will also concurrently conduct a process evaluation to inform sustainability and future implementation of such interventions.
People with mental health conditions (MHC) often face significant barriers in obtaining personal valued social roles and feeling a sense of belonging to their community. With the growing emphasis on community integration, and the fact that the vast majority of people with MHC live in the community, there is an effort to develop interventions and services which focus on recovery, wellbeing, and community integration, to reclaim "right to a safe, dignified, and personal and gratifying life in the community despite his or her psychiatric condition" (Davidson, Tondora, Lawless, O'Connell, & Rowe, 2009, p.11).Music therapy (MT) has been practiced for many decades with growing evidence for its effectiveness in different populations, including people with MHC. Music has pivotal influences on socialization and in building inter-personal skills and has the potential to be effective as a community-based therapeutic approach in bringing people together in a shared experience, an important step towards integration back to the community. MT encourages verbal and non-verbal interactions and offers opportunity to practice interpersonal skills, build relationships and peruse common goals. The proposed study has a potential to shed additional light on the processes of recovery in people living in the community with MHC who are participating in group CoMT. Although the study will pinpoint to the domains where MT was mostly studied before (social skills, group cohesion and emotional expression), it is unique in two main aspects: 1. Majority of previous MT studies on people with MHC were testing short-term MT interventions in in-patient brief settings. This has limited significance in understanding the generalization of MT into everyday life and promoting wellbeing. In the proposed study, on the other hand, I will try to evaluate the significance of recovery-oriented long-term group CoMT in the community, where most people live, focusing on behavioral domains where MT is expected to benefit most: The client's social skills development, group cohesion and emotional expression (affect improvement). 2. This study, to my knowledge, is the first that is based on longitudinal quantitative micro-analysis of filmed video sessions. This approach bypasses the participants subjective reaction to a qualitative interview (which by itself is important) allowing an additional un-biased angle of observation on the interaction process (assuming that the participants may ignore the presence of the video camera over time).
This study aims to describe the baseline rate of safe firearm storage device use in the homes of pediatric patients with mental health complaints treated in the Emergency Department (ED) and/or inpatient psychiatric unit of an urban tertiary pediatric hospital. Follow-up data will be collected to ascertain any change(s) in the rate of safe firearm storage device use after patients have been treated for a mental health complaint, which includes standardized recommendations for safe firearm storage practices. This study also involves an intervention to distribute safe firearm storage devices to families of pediatric mental health patients during their hospital visit, and assesses whether safe storage device distribution impacts reported future rate of firearm safety device use.
Specific Aim #1: Examining the impact of mental health disorders (PTSD and GAD) on peripheral vascular function and sympathetic nervous system activity in young individuals. Specific Aim #2: Examining the impact of mental health disorders (PTSD and GAD) on peripheral hemodynamics and metabolic byproducts during small muscle mass exercise in young individuals. Specific Aim #3: Examining the impact of mental health disorders (PTSD and GAD) on exercise tolerance, peripheral hemodynamics and metabolic byproducts during large muscle mass exercise in young individuals.
This randomized program evaluation is undertaken in conjunction with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Mental Health Operations (OMHO) and the Quality Enhancement Research Initiative. It is designed to answer two related questions: (1) Can an evidence-based implementation strategy using the Center for Disease Control (CDC)'s Replicating Effective Programs plus External Facilitation (REP-F) enhance the adoption of team-based care in VA General Mental Health (GMH) Clinics, and (2) Does the establishment of such teams via implementation enhance Veterans' health status, satisfaction, and perceptions of care? The model for team-based care is the evidence-based Collaborative Chronic Care Model (CCM). In conjunction with a nation-wide roll-out of the VA's Behavioral Health Interdisciplinary Program team (BHIP) initiative, the investigators have structured a randomized, controlled program evaluation to answer these questions. Specifically, using a stepped wedge design the investigators will randomize 9 VAMCs that have requested support in establishing a BHIP to 1 of 3 waves of REP-F support: immediate implementation support vs. 4-month vs. 8-month wait with dissemination of CCM materials (3 sites per wave). Fidelity and health outcome measures will be collected in a repeated measures design at 6-month intervals, and analyzed with general linear modeling.
The current protocol pertains to the evaluation of the interactive computer-assisted screening (iCAS) tool through a pilot randomized control trial. The purpose of this evaluation is to determine the efficacy of the iCAS tool in improving clinician's detection of common mental health conditions (i.e. major depression/generalized anxiety/post-traumatic stress disorder/alcohol dependence), and patients' discussion on mental health.
The investigators will test the effectiveness of a youth-led animal husbandry microfinance program, Rabbits for Resilience, combined with the adult microfinance, Pigs for Peace (PFP), program on youth, family and community resilience outcomes. The following aims will be completed over the five-year longitudinal, mixed-method, cluster randomized community trial: Specific Aim 1: Determine the relative effectiveness of a youth-led microfinance combined with the adult microfinance on youth and family resilience outcomes (reduced mental health distress, increased economic stability, improved family functioning) compared to a youth-led microfinance only and adult microfinance only approaches. - The investigators hypothesize that at six, twelve and 18-months post-baseline youth and adults in households in the youth-led and adult microfinance approach will report improved individual and family resilience outcomes compared to households in the youth-led microfinance only and adult microfinance only approaches. Specific Aim 2: Determine the relative effectiveness of a youth-led microfinance combined with PFP microfinance on community resilience (e.g. social capital and participation in community groups by youth and adults) compared to youth-led microfinance only and adult microfinance only approaches. - The investigators hypothesize that at 18-months post baseline in households in the youth-led and adult microfinance will report improved community resilience compared to households in the youth-led microfinance only and adult microfinance only approaches Specific Aim 3: Determine if changes in youth resilience (caregiving ability, empathy and outlook for the future) mediate the relationship between youth engagement in microfinance and outcomes, as measured by reduced mental health distress, improved family functioning and improved social capital. Specific Aim 4: Examine youth perspectives on resilience in the context of multiple adversities (war, poverty, loss of family, displacement, victimization). Youth participants (N=50, ages 10-15 years) will be invited (with parent/caregiver consent) to complete at baseline and 18 month post-baseline qualitative interview/group discussion to examine individual, family and community resilience and what that participants perceive as key to buffering the negative health and social consequences of prolonged conflict and other adversities.
Patient participation (PP) in Hospital is a goal defined by the Norwegian Health Authorities and it is a mandatory activity for District Psychiatric out-patient Centres (DPC) in Norway: patients are entitled to have influence on their treatment and should receive sufficient information directed at empowerment. Nevertheless, studies from Norway have found that patients who seek help are dissatisfied with the information they receive and doubt their possibility for real influence on their treatment. One way to improve individual PP might be to give patients sufficient information and education before they start their treatment in the form of an educational group intervention, an introduction seminar (IS); this group intervention is less time and resource consuming than individual interventions. Aims: The main purpose of this project is to develop and evaluate an IS for patients on a waiting list of DPC. The seminar will educate patients, so they can actively participate in their own treatment and, thereby, choosing treatment, reducing the risk of dropping out of treatment. Another aim is to enable patients to participate in their own treatment, to cope with their problems while they are waiting for treatment by providing them contact with primary health care and user organizations during their waiting time, and to increase adherence. Methods: The project involves three components: an exploratory study of educational content of the seminar; RCT of that 4-hours program (to examine its effect on treatment preferences and choices, activation, satisfaction, mental health and cost-benefit) and then a post-seminar qualitative evaluation, which will be used to create a broad yet deep understanding of the practical side of the participants`experience and the seminar's effect.