View clinical trials related to Lung Neoplasms.
Filter by:This comparative effectiveness and descriptive retrospective cohort study will evaluate safety and effectiveness outcomes among commercially insured adults who received a granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilar or originator product during the first cycle of clinical guideline-indicated intermediate or high febrile neutropenia risk chemotherapy.
This study investigates multi-level barriers to lung cancer screening uptake and adherence to lung cancer screening. Identifying cost- and convenience-related barriers to lung cancer screening may help researchers develop targeted strategies to facilitate screening adherence specifically among vulnerable populations.
This is a Phase I exploratory study. The study is divided into two parts (A/B).In part A, the primary endpoint is the determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoint for phase Ia includes evaluating the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). Following the establishment of the RP2D, the expansion cohort will be initiated. Transitioning to part B, 20 patients will be enrolled to further evaluate the ORR. All patients will receive the trametinib plus anlotinib regimen based on the RP2D determined in part A. The primary endpoint for part B is to assess the ORR, while secondary endpoint includes evaluating PFS, overall survival (OS), DCR, AEs, and duration of overall response (DoR). In part A, the study plans to enroll eligible patients to receive the MEK inhibitor trametinib (2 mg) in combination with anlotinib (6mg, 8 mg, 10 mg, 12 mg). The number of subjects is determined according to the actual situation of dose climbing. In part B, another 20 eligible patients will be enrolled and treated with trametinib (2mg) + anlotinib (RP2D), until the disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity occurs to further evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy. Patients participated in safety follow-up after the first course of treatment until 3 months after discontinuation due to PD or toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities from the first cycle were collected. Therapeutic efficacy evaluation was scheduled according to RECIST version 1.1 every 4-8 weeks. After the investigators' evaluation, the assessment cycle could extend to 12 weeks or longer due to the uncontrollable factors during the treatment period. Blood samples will be collected for pharmacokinetic analysis and biomarker discovery at baseline and at each periodic assessment.
VOICE project aims to guide health services in their reorganization towards the provision of the highest value care for the patient at the best cost. VOICE is targeted to patients with breast and lung cancer. The purpose is to offer a new innovative strategic framework based on value-based healthcare model to these patients in Europe. VOICE Community consists of 13 hospitals across Europe working collaboratively to implement this approach. The Community addresses what matters most to patients by measuring patient reported health outcomes in routine clinical practice on a systematic and long-term basis, by including patients´ perspective in clinical decision-making, improving patient empowerment and physician-patient communication, assessing the impact on costs of the processes implemented, identifying factors for a successful implementation of value-based healthcare and boosting knowledge generation and best practice exchange across Europe. The VOICE ambition is to collect the health-related Quality of Life evidence from more than 1000 patients (patients with breast cancer and patients with lung cancer), by means of health related and patient reported questionnaires (ICHOM, International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurements, standard sets). Hospitals will go further by assessing the satisfaction, acceptability, relationship with professionals or decision-making process with patients. The VOICE Community will benchmark health outcomes and related costs to improve care delivery of these patients.
This study aims to explore the clinical significance and feasibility of double site biopsy by analyzing the pathological characteristics and the incidence of main complications of CT guided puncture biopsy of lung and other parts coexisting lesions.
- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of ERAS-007 or ERAS-601 in combination with other cancer therapies in study participants with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). - To determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and/or Recommended Dose (RD) of ERAS-007 or ERAS-601 administered in combination with other cancer therapies. - To evaluate the antitumor activity of ERAS-007 or ERAS-601 in combination with other cancer therapies. - To evaluate the PK profiles of ERAS-007 or ERAS-601 and other cancer therapies when administered in combination.
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether ULDCT with ASiR-V can be used for the detection and diameter measurement of pulmonary nodules at an extremely low dose comparable to those associated with plain-film chest radiography. Furthermore, mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors for the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection to explore the application range of ULDCT in Chinese patients.
This phase 2 trial examining the combination of ociperlimab plus tislelizumab plus cCRT is expected to provide valuable data to advance treatment options in the serious unmet medical need population of LS-SCLC patients. Immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy may have a synergetic anti -cancer activities. The combination of anti-TIGIT antibody and anti-PD-1/L1 antibody may augment the immune effect with tolerable safety profile. The novel therapeutic strategy with dule immune therapy in combination with CRT is expected to provide valuable data to advance treatment options in the population of LS-SCLC patients.
This Phase 1 trial aimed to determine the maximum tolerated fraction dose (MTD) of hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) combined with concurrent chemotherapy and subsequent consolidation immune checkpoint inhibitors (cICI) for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).
Lung cancer screening rates are very low despite the fact that lung cancer screening could save many lives. People need to understand the risks and benefits to screening as well as their own beliefs about screening. This study builds an intervention in real world primary care that will help people make the right decision for them as well as help people to quit smoking. Interventions like this are needed to improve the screening rate and reduce death from lung cancer, which is the leading cancer killer.