View clinical trials related to Lung Neoplasms.
Filter by:EGFR mutation positive advanced NSCLC patients with CNS metastases were associated with poor prognosis. Furmonertinib showed promising CNS efficacy in doses of 80 mg orally once daily or higher in patients with EGFR T790M mutation positive NSCLC. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib in the treatment of EGFR-sensitive mutation positive NSCLC patients with brain metastasis.
The purpose of this study is to further understand the factors involved in increasing lung cancer screening.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of osimertinib (tablet) in combination with Datopotamab Deruxtecan (i.v. infusion) compared with osimertinib (tablet) monotherapy as a first-line therapy in participants with locally advanced or metastatic EGFRm (Ex19del and/or L858R) NSCLC. Study details include: 1. The study duration will be event-driven, with an estimated duration of approximately 9 years. 2. Participants may receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other specific discontinuation criteria are met. 3. The visit frequency will be every 3 weeks during the treatment period. Note: Participants on osimertinib treatment (osimertinib only arm or who have discontinued Datopotamab Deruxtecan while are still receiving osimertinib) are required to attend visits to perform assessments every 6 weeks from Cycle 7 until Cycle 17 and then visits every 12 weeks until disease progression, IP discontinuation or primary PFS DCO. Participants who are receiving osimertinib + Datopotamab Deruxtecan are still required to attend visit to perform assessment every 3 weeks (q3w) per SoA.
The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Committee recently unveiled the ninth edition of TNM staging system for lung cancer. This study aims to explore survival outcomes, stage grouping, and gene mutations in N descriptors of this new classification system.
This is a phase II, open-label, single-arm, single-center clinical study to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of sunvozertinib in combination with anlotinib in patients with EGFR-sensitive mutations and co-mutations in locally advanced or metastatic treatment-naive non-small cell lung cancer. Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Drug: sunvozertinib Drug: anlotinib Phase 2
A study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of α-PD-L1/4-1BB DLL3 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T (BHP01) in patients with Relapsed/Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) and determine the appropriate CAR-T cell dose. Next, In dose expansion phase, patients were assign two groups with/without bridge radiotherapy.
The goal of this clinical trial is to confirm that SB27 works in the same way as Keytruda in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The main question it aims to answer is: • How effective the study drug is Participants will receive either investigational product (SB27 or Keytruda) and chemotherapy every 3 weeks. Researchers will compare SB27 and Keytruda to see if SB27 works in the same way as Keytruda.
Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RTS) is safe and effective for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). During RTS, division, dissection, and sealing of lung tissue, bronchi, and blood vessels can be performed using handheld staplers with assistance from a bedside surgeon (Surgeon-Assisted), or totally robotically with robotic staplers and energy devices by the console surgeon (Totally Robotic). Totally Robotic lung resection enables the operating surgeon to perform the case independently, but its implication on costs and patient outcomes remains unknown. There also is, however, a lack of prospective research evaluating the costs of the two methods for dissection and vessel sealing in RTS. This RCT aims to evaluate the costs and perioperative patient outcomes of Totally Robotic lung resection using the Vessel Sealer Extend energy device (for vessels <7mm) and the SureForm robotic stapler (Intervention) versus Surgeon-Assisted robotic lung resection using the Signia stapler (Control) during RTS for NSCLC using the da Vinci system.
The goal of this clinical trial is to verify the effectiveness and safety of the low load blood flow restriction training program. The intervention effect, tolerance and compliance of low load blood flow restriction training and progressive resistance training on lung cancer patients complicated with sarcopenia during chemotherapy will be compared, in order to provide new ideas for improving or reversing sarcopenia. The main questions it aims to answer are: Can low load blood flow restriction training improve sarcopenia in chemotherapy induced lung cancer patients? Which training method is more effective and tolerable between low load blood flow restriction training and progressive resistance training? Participants will be randomly divided into 3 groups： 1. Routine care group (Control group, CON): The researchers will provide participants with regular exercise and dietary guidance. 2. Low load blood flow restriction group (LL-BFRT): The researchers will provide participants with a low load blood flow restriction training program constructed by our research group. 3. Progressive resistance training group (PRE): The researchers will provide participants with progressive resistance training.
This is a study evaluating the efficacy and safety of MK-1084 with pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in participants with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with identified Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog G12C (KRAS G12C) mutation and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. There are two primary study hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: Combination of MK-1084 and pembrolizumab is superior to placebo plus pembrolizumab with respect to progression free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Hypothesis 2: Combination of MK-1084 plus pembrolizumab is superior to placebo plus pembrolizumab with respect to overall survival (OS).