View clinical trials related to Intracranial Aneurysm.
Filter by:The protocol has many assets. A prospective nationwide recruitment allows for the inclusion of a large cohort of patients with UIA. It will combine accurate clinical phenotyping and comprehensive imaging with CAWE screening. Besides, it will enable to exploit metadata and to explore new pathophysiological pathways of interest by crossing clinical, genetic, biological, and imaging information.
In recent years, many developments have been made to the tools and techniques used to treat IAs via endovascular intervention. Specifically, to the detachable coils themselves. In March 2018, the US Food and Drug administration granted Balt USA 510(k) clearance for the Optima Coil System™. Earlier this year, the list of devices included within the system has expanded to include OptiMAX Complex Super Soft and Complex Soft coils. It consists of coils that come in Standard, Soft and Super Soft profiles and allows for instant detachment from the pusher. The APPLY study is a prospective, single-center investigator-initiated study meant to assess the use of the Balt Optima™ Coil System. The site is looking to enroll approximately 30 subjects over the course of two years. The Optima Coil System™ is commercially available in the United States as such this study is looking for real-world data.
"Study on the effectiveness and safety of the coil system for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms embolization" was sponsored by Zhuhai Tongqiao Medical Technology Co., Ltd. The trial design is: prospective, multi-center, randomized, open, parallel positive control, and non-inferiority test. Purpose: To compare the data obtained by using the coil system produced by Zhuhai Tongqiao Medical Technology Co., Ltd. and the Axium Detachable Coil produced by Medtronic for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of coil system for intracranial aneurysms embolization.
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™ in the treatment with acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
The purpose of this Post-Market Clinical Follow-up study is to assess the safety and performance of the Trenza in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
The purpose of this study is to assess safety and effectiveness of the p64 MW HPC or p48 MW HPC Flow Modulation Device under prasugrel.
The purpose of this study is to assess safety and effectiveness of the p64 MW HPC or p48 MW HPC Flow Modulation Device under Dual Antiplatelet Medication.
This trial is a is a prospective, randomized (1:1) placebo-controlled, clinical trial with blinded endpoint assessment of 440 participants with unruptured brain aneurysm planned for endovascular treatment using coiling-only approach (primary coiling or using balloon-assistance but not stenting) to test if oral acetylsalicylic acid (325 mg/ day for a total of 5 days) is superior placebo in preventing clinical and silent strokes. The primary outcome is a clinical or silent stroke at the time of discharge assessed by clinical examination and MRI brain. Participants will return to the clinic or be contacted by phone for the end of study procedures on Day 90 to collect functional outcome data.
The objective of this retrospective study is to describe in real-life settings the clinical practice, utilization and the treated population outcomes at 1-year (12-16 months) follow-up at selected, representative centers in France.
The uncertainty regarding the management of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (UIAs) has not progressed in the last 30 years. The fundamental ethical basis for this study is that physicians should only offer a risky preventive treatment when it has been shown to be beneficial. Before that, such treatment should be offered as an RCT. The CAM trial offers a comprehensive framework, so that all patients confronted with the clinical dilemma can be offered participation. The prinicpal questions to be addressed are : 1. do patients with UIAs, considered for curative treatments, have a better long-term clinical outcome with active treatment or conservative management? 2. when patients are considered ineligible for conservative management, and surgical and endovascular management are both judged reasonable, do patients with UIAs have a better long-term clinical outcome with surgical or endovascular management? The primary hypothesis for patients allocated to at least 2 options, one of which is conservative management is: the 10 year combined neurological morbidity and mortality (mRS>2) will be reduced from 24% to 16% (beta 80%; alpha 0.048; sample size 961 patients (836 plus 15% losses to FU and cross-overs) with active treatment. This study is designed as a pragmatic, comprehensive way to address the unruptured aneurysm clinical dilemma, combining large simple RCTs whenever patients are judged eligible for more than one management option, or otherwise a registry of each option. All patients with one or more UIAs will be eligible for participation in either a registry or one of the trials. Patients will be followed for 10 years according to a standard of car follow-up schedule. The primary outcome is survival without neurological dependency (mRS<3) at 10 years. The secondary outcomes are: 1. the incidence of SAH during follow-up and related morbidity and mortality; 2. the morbidity and mortality related to endovascular or surgical treatment of the UIA at one year; 3. overall mortality at 1, 5 and 10 years; 4. overall morbidity (mRS>2) at 1, 5 and 10 years; 5. length of hospitalization; 6. discharge to location other than home