Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05262374
Other study ID # MKUH-RD-021
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date February 9, 2023
Est. completion date March 31, 2024

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Contact Joanne Turner
Phone +44 1908995136
Email joanne.turner@mkuh.nhs.uk
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This trial will compare laparoscopic and robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairs, using the Versius® system. We will initially aim to recruit 60 patients (20 patients in the laparoscopic arm and 40 in the robotic arm) in order to assess the ergonomic impact of each modality on the operating surgeon. This aims to provide in vivo information on whether robotic surgery provides any advantages to the operating surgeon. This trial will also be used to assess the feasibility of recruitment to a future larger study, and any data collected will be used as pilot data.


Description:

This study has been designed to assess the ergonomics of Versius® assisted surgery in comparison with laparoscopic surgery in the management of inguinal hernias. The study will randomise 60 patients who require repair of an inguinal hernia and have been deemed suitable for a minimally invasive approach. Patients will be randomised to receive either laparoscopic or Versius® robotic assisted surgery but will be informed that it will be attempted via a minimally invasive approach that could include either of these two subtypes of minimally invasive surgery. The randomisation will occur on a 2:1 basis, with 2 patients allocated to the robotic arm for every 1 patient allocated to the laparoscopic arm. Laparoscopic surgery is already a well-established technique, and therefore the study team believe more valuable data about the outcomes of robotic surgery will be obtained with this randomisation ratio given that no prior studies have been undertaken using this robotic platform. All surgeons in the study will be required to have been involved in at least 20 cases performed using the relevant modality, whether for the robotic or laparoscopic cohorts. Data will be collected at four key timepoints; recruitment, intraoperatively, at discharge and again at 14 days following intervention. Feasibility outcomes will include willingness to be recruited to study (acceptability), willingness for patient to undergo desired randomised operative approach (acceptability/concordance), withdrawal of patients (non-concordance), study retention (retention rates), and the usefulness and limitations of outcome measures.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date March 31, 2024
Est. primary completion date March 31, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 100 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age =18 years - Need for inguinal hernia repair surgery - Deemed suitable for minimally invasive surgery Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who are unable to consent - Prisoners - Patients in need of emergency surgery - Patients with inguinoscrotal or recurrent inguinal hernias

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Procedure/Surgery: Laparoscopic
Surgeon
Robotic
Versius system.

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom Surgical Division Milton Keynes

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Joanne Turner

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary To compare the operating surgeon ergonomics (physical strain) of laparoscopic and Versius® robotic assisted surgery body position (physical strain) and cognitive workload (mental strain) assessed using the REBA score Length of the procedure expected to be between 1-4 hours
Secondary Measurement of the rate of participant recruitment Measure the number of participants recruited over the length of time. The units of measurement will be presented on a scale of number of participants over a predetermined length of time Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Secondary Measurement of drop-out (withdrawal) rate of participants Measure the number of participants who withdrawal (drop out) from the trial. The units of measurement will be presented on a scale of numbers of withdrawals versus time. Assessed from Day 1 (Randomisation) to date of withdrawal
Secondary Measurement of the unblinding rate of participants Measure the number of participants where the treatment is unblinded during the trial. This is measured by the number of participants over the length of time who's treatment is unblinded. Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Secondary Mental strain of surgeon To compare the operating surgeon mental strain of each approach using the NASA-Task Load Index score. 30 minutes maximum completion time per surgeon
Secondary Health Economics Explore health economic aspects of each approach via calculation of the entire hospital episode and individual operation (including fixed costs and instrument costs) comparing the cost for cohort using the Versus Surgical Robot versus the human surgeon. Procedure and recovery inpatient stay per participant expected to be between 1-3 days.
Secondary Communication To compare differences in in-theatre communication assessed from audiovisual footage, using the Oxford NOTECHS II score. 1-4 hours expected for the duration of the procedure
Secondary Satisfaction with life scale Quality of life units completion of EQ-5D-5L questionnaires post operatively at recruitment Day 1 and on day 14. Total scores used not sub scales to be reported. Assessed on Day 1 and Day 14
Secondary Satisfaction with life Quality of life units completion of MFSI-SF questionnaires post operatively at recruitment Day 1 and on day 14. Total scores used not sub scales to be reported. Assessed on Day 1 and Day 14
Secondary Length of in-patient stay Measure of the time in days of each participant's hospital stay as an in-patient. Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Pain Scores Using a uni-dimensional pain score measurement examining the change from baseline. Day 14
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03023462 - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT04272320 - The Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03904888 - Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03856710 - Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT02240550 - A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT01679353 - Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Magnesium Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT01943760 - Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty Phase 4
Recruiting NCT01450345 - Efficacy of Pre-operative Oral Pregabalin in Ambulatory Inguinal Hernia Repair for Post Operative Pain Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT00968773 - Rebound Hernia Repair Device Mesh Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT01000116 - Fibrin Glue Versus Tacked Fixation in Groin Hernia Repair (TAPP) N/A
Completed NCT01117337 - Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Phase 4
Terminated NCT00226161 - Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy N/A
Completed NCT05837013 - Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT05058378 - Correlation Between Spinal Anesthesia and Perfusion Index
Completed NCT01637818 - Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT05879770 - Is the Use of Prolene as Sufficient as the Use of Wire in Shouldice Surgery to Keep the Recurrence Rate Low After One Year?
Completed NCT05159232 - Length of Hospital Stay in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Vs. Open Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT05107986 - Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
Active, not recruiting NCT04328597 - Portuguese Inguinal Hernia Cohort (PINE) Study
Completed NCT04033055 - Antalgic Efficacy of CycloMesh™ Soaked in Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia. N/A