View clinical trials related to Influenza, Human.
Filter by:The aim of the study is to demonstrate safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent influenza intradermal (QIV-ID) vaccine compared to the trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) containing the B strain from the primary (Yamagata) lineage (TIV-ID1) and the trivalent influenza vaccine containing B strain from the alternate (Victoria) lineage (TIV-ID2) vaccines in producing protection against four strains of influenza virus. Primary Objective: - To demonstrate that QIV-ID induces an immune response (as assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) geometric mean titers (GMTs) and seroconversion rates) that is non-inferior to responses induced by TIV-ID1 and TIV-ID2 for the 4 virus strains at 28 days post-vaccination. Secondary Objectives: - To demonstrate that each B strain in QIV-ID induces an immune response (as assessed by HAI GMTs and seroconversion rates) that is superior to the response induced by the TIV-ID that does not contain the corresponding B strain. - To describe the rate of post-vaccination seroprotection induced by QIV-ID and TIV-ID. - To describe post-vaccination immunogenicity stratified by age (18-49 years and 50-64 years), race, ethnicity, gender, previous vaccination status, and baseline seropositivity status. - To describe the safety profile for subjects who receive QIV-ID and TIV-ID. Observational Objectives: - To demonstrate non-inferiority of QIV-ID compared to TIV-ID in terms of all Grade 2 or Grade 3 solicited systemic reactions combined - To demonstrate non-inferiority of QIV-ID compared to TIV-ID in terms of all Grade 3 solicited injection site reactions combined.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of the new influenza vaccine GSK2282512A (FLU-Q-QIV) and compare its activity to the marketed vaccine Fluarix® (TIV) in young children 6 to 35 months of age.
The ways in which influenza is transmitted between people are uncertain; for example, we do not know if large droplets or fine particles (aerosols) matter most; both are produced by coughing and sneezing. This means we cannot say what precautions work best in real life. Improving our understanding is vital to allow the development of guidelines and policies to help reduce the transmission of both pandemic and seasonal flu. The aim of this study is to explore how influenza is spread, specifically by looking at the importance of spread via small particles (aerosols/droplet nuclei) that are carried in respiratory sprays e.g. produced by coughing and sneezing. The primary objective of this study is: To estimate the contribution of aerosols/droplet nuclei to influenza transmission by determining the secondary attack rate (SAR) of influenza in Recipients randomised to a control arm (no intervention - allowing all modes of transmission) compared to Recipients randomised to an intervention arm (face shield and hand hygiene - allowing only transmission by aerosols/droplet nuclei) when both groups of Recipients are exposed to Donor volunteers infected with influenza via intranasal drops. The hypothesis is that: The SAR will be lower in Recipients exposed only to aerosols/droplet nuclei (intervention arm) compared to those exposed to all modes of transmission (the control arm): aerosols/droplet nuclei, droplet spray (larger respiratory droplets) and transmission through contact.
The project aims to evaluate the impact of skin routes of immunization (transcutaneous and intradermal vs intramuscular) on cellular and humoral responses to seasonal influenza vaccination in adults (18-45 years old).
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' investigational vaccine GSK2321138A in children who previously participated in study 115345 (FLU D-QIV-004 PRI) (NCT01439360).
This study will evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of FP-01.1 and FP-01.1 reformulated with an adjuvant (FP-01.1-Adjuvant) in relatively healthy subjects 65 to 74 years of age, subjects that are more representative of the target population. Both formulations will be administered alone or concomitantly with the Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus (TIV) vaccine.
Vaccinating schoolchildren against influenza would prevent the disease among non-vaccinated household members.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of Fluzone vaccine (18 years to <65 years of age and ≥ 65 years of age), Fluzone Intradermal vaccine (18 years to <65 years of age), and Fluzone High-Dose vaccine (≥ 65 years of age). Primary Objective: - To describe the safety of the 2012 - 2013 formulation of Fluzone and Fluzone Intradermal vaccines in adults 18 to < 65 years of age and the safety of the 2012 - 2013 formulation of Fluzone and Fluzone High-Dose vaccines in adults ≥ 65 years of age. Observational Objectives: - To describe the immunogenicity of the 2012 - 2013 formulation of Fluzone and Fluzone Intradermal vaccines in adults 18 to < 65 years of age and the immunogenicity of the 2012 - 2013 formulation of Fluzone and Fluzone High-Dose vaccines in adults ≥ 65 years of age. - To evaluate the compliance, in terms of immunogenicity, of each study vaccine (Fluzone, Fluzone Intradermal, and Fluzone High-Dose) in the applicable age group with the requirements of the Committee for Human Medicinal Products (CHMP) Note for Guidance (NfG) CPMP/BWP/214/96. - To submit remaining available sera from subjects given Fluzone vaccine to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) for further analysis by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to support selection and recommendation of strains for subsequent years' influenza vaccines.
The aim of this clinical study is to demonstrate safety and immunogenicity of Fluzone vaccine. Objective: - To describe the safety of the 2012-2013 formulation of Fluzone vaccine, administered in a 1- or 2-dose schedule, in accordance with Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations, in children 6 months to < 9 years of age. Observational Objectives: - To describe the immunogenicity of the 2012-2013 formulation of Fluzone vaccine, administered in a 1- or 2-dose schedule in accordance with ACIP recommendations, in children 6 months to < 9 years of age. - To submit remaining available sera from subjects to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) for further analysis by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to support selection and recommendation of strains for subsequent years' influenza vaccines.
The purpose of this study is to determine if the administration of a seasonal flu vaccine using a PharmaJet's needle-free injection device (STRATIS) is equivalent to needle and syringe administration, as measured by laboratory tests of immune response.