Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02262416
Other study ID # 01102014
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase Phase 3
First received October 7, 2014
Last updated October 10, 2014
Start date January 2015
Est. completion date January 2016

Study information

Verified date October 2014
Source Queensland Fertility Group
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Australia: Human Research Ethics Committee
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) is the term commonly applied to a form of treatment for infertility that involves controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, egg maturation, egg collection, fertilisation, embryo culture and finally embryo transfer. The period after egg collection is called luteal phase. In Australia, vaginal progesterone is routinely used to support the lining of the uterus so that it is susceptible to implantation of the embryos.

More recently, there has been some suggestion that additional supplementation of luteal phase with GnRH agonist increases clinical pregnancy and live birth rate. These studies are however heterogeneous and results were inconsistent.

This study is a prospective randomised controlled trial of additional GnRH agonist in luteal phase of antagonist cycle. The primary hypothesis is that GnRH agonist increases the number of live birth . The secondary hypothesis is that this increases the clinical pregnancy rate, on-going pregnancy rate, without affecting the miscarriage rate, ovarian hyperstimulation rate and multiple pregnancy rate.


Description:

In-vitro fertilization has been used since 1978 to treat women with infertility. It involves controlled ovarian stimulation, egg maturation, egg collection, fertilization and embryo culture and finally embryo culture. The luteal phase is the latter phase of the menstrual cycle which begins with the formation of the corpora lutea and ends in either pregnancy or luteolysis. The main hormone associated with this stage is progesterone, which is significantly higher during the luteal phase than other phases of the cycle. In the IVF setting, however, luteal phase deficiency is present and over the last 40 years various regimens have been used to support luteal phase of the cycle. Progesterone is currently widely used for this purpose and has shown to be effective in improving pregnancy and live birth rate (Van der Linden 2011).

There have been various other regimen used for luteal support in an attempt to further enhance luteal phase support such as oestrogen, HCG and GnRH agonist. The recent Cochrane study showed a significant benefit from addition of GnRH agonist to progesterone versus progesterone alone for the outcomes of live birth, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy. (Van Der Linden 2011) However, the conclusion derived from the metaanalysis were derived from limited number of studies that used various types additional luteal phase support, which also included a myriad of agonist and antagonist IVF cycles. Only ICSI cycles were included in the antagonist cycles.

A gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist is a synthetic peptide that interacts with the GnRH hormone receptor to elicit its biologic response, the release of the pituitary hormones, FHS and LH. The exact mechanism of how GnRH could potentially increase pregnancy rate is unknown. Tesarik et al performed a randomised study in which addition of GnRH agonist increases implantation rate in donor recipient discounted the theory that GnRH acted on corpora lutea. It is suggested that GnRH acts directly on embryo to secrete BHCG hence enhances implantation. A prospective randomised study that was performed by Isik et al showed a promising result of use of GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase of GnRH antagonist cycle (n=164). In this study, cases received 0.5mg leuprolide acetate in addition to 600mg micronised progesterone day 6 after ICSI compared to control group who received micronisd progesterone only. The study showed clinical pregnancy rate of 40% in cases vs 20% in control group. The increased number of multiple pregnancies in these studies could be partly explained by multiple embryos transferred. Answer is needed to determine if multiple pregnancy rate is higher if single embryo transfer is executed.

The studies performed by Tesarik et al and Isik et al showed promising increase in live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rates in antagonist cycles. Both studies were performed in clinical settings that were vastly different from Australia: multiple embryos were transferred, multiple luteal phase support were used in addition to progesterone and multiple pregnancy rates were high. Given the significant increase in pregnancy rate (>10%) were observed in these studies, if the increase is real, a RCT in Australia setting is needed prior to implementation of this intervention.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 200
Est. completion date January 2016
Est. primary completion date January 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 42 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Single embryo transfer

2. Antagonist cycle with HCG trigger

3. Use of progesterone as luteal phase support (crinone or progesterone pessary )

4. Women undergoing their first IVF cycle with TFC

5. Age 18-42 inclusive

Exclusion Criteria:

No or frozen embryo transfer planned b. Use of other luteal support c. Known contraindication to the use of GnRH analogue

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
leuprolide
normal saline

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Queensland Fertility Group Brisbane Queensland

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Queensland Fertility Group

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Australia, 

References & Publications (1)

Isik AZ, Caglar GS, Sozen E, Akarsu C, Tuncay G, Ozbicer T, Vicdan K. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Oct;19(4):472-7. Single-dose GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase of GnRH antagonist cycles: a prospective randomized study. Medsafe New Zealand. www.medsafe.govt.nz/profs/datasheet/l/Lucrininj.pdf Tarlatzis BC, Bili H.Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2004 Jan;3(1):39-46. Safety of GnRH agonists and antagonists Tesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza C.Hum Reprod. 2004 May;19(5):1176-80. Enhancement of embryo developmental potential by a single administration of GnRH agonist at the time of implantation Tesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza-Tesarik R, Mendoza N, Mendoza C. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2572-9. Beneficial effect of luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist- and antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles. Van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10). Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary live birth live birth 1 year No
Primary on-going pregnancy +ve fetal heart rate at nuchal scan 3 months No
Secondary pregnancy positive serum pregnancy test 2 weeks No
Secondary Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome hospitalisation due to the condition 3 months Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03607409 - Role of Inhibin A as Biomarker for Ovarian Response for IVF Treatment
Recruiting NCT02312076 - GnRHa for Luteal Phase Support in Long GnRHa Protocol Cycles Phase 4
Terminated NCT02161861 - Improvement of IVF Fertilization Rates, by the Cyclic Tripeptide FEE - Prospective Randomized Study N/A
Completed NCT03287479 - Comparison of a Semi-automated Closed Vitrification System (Gavi®) With a Manual Open Vitrification Sytem (Cryotop®) N/A
Terminated NCT03522350 - Randomized Trial Comparing EmbryoScope With EmbryoScope+. N/A
Completed NCT04496284 - Embryo Transfer Outcomes After Vitrification With Slush Nitrogen Compared to Liquid Nitrogen N/A
Completed NCT03623659 - pArtiaL zonA pelluciDa Removal by assisteD hatchINg of Blastocysts N/A
Completed NCT03895099 - New Ovarian Stimulation With Random Start, Use of Progestin Protocol for Oocyte Donors Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT04142112 - Randomized, Standard-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Ohana IVF Sperm Preparation Kit, SPeRtility IVF Next Generation N/A
Completed NCT03152643 - Cumulative Live Birth Rates After Cleavage-stage Versus Blastocyst-stage Embryo Transfer N/A
Recruiting NCT03683771 - Assessment of Endometrial Pattern and Sub-endometrial Vascularity in ICSI Outcome
Recruiting NCT03161119 - Comparing Two Different Embryo Transfer Catheters N/A
Completed NCT04108039 - Micronized Progesterone vs Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles. N/A
Completed NCT03678584 - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Chaetoglobosin A ( ICSI-CA) N/A
Completed NCT03678597 - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin B ( ICSI-LB) N/A
Completed NCT03678610 - Handling Medium for ICSI With Ionomycin and Latrunculin A N/A
Completed NCT03678818 - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin A (ICSI-LA) N/A
Completed NCT03678558 - Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Cytochalasin B N/A
Completed NCT03678571 - Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Latrunculin A N/A
Completed NCT03677492 - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Cytochalasin D ( ICSI-CD) N/A